Differences between revisions 1 and 29 (spanning 28 versions)

7. Interbull CoP - Data Exchange and time of evaluation

7.1 Data from participating organizations to the Interbull Centre:

7.1.1 Each participating organization is expected to provide:

A pedigree in a sire-dam format to be uploaded into the IDEA (Interbull Data Exchange Area) website,
Predicted genetic merit file for any trait the country participates with data in the international evaluations, and
File with parameters to be used in the international genetic evaluation.
All above files must be checked by the relevant checking program available inside IDEA
The .zip file produced for the pedigree and/or for the predicted genetic merit file plus parameter needs to be uploaded into IDEA

Countries are also expected to prepare files for genetic validation whenever (major) changes in national evaluations require that data is submitted for a test evaluation run, or when the previous genetic validation was done more than two years ago. Files should be prepared according to the applicable formats available in the Interbull webpage www.interbull.org

200 = pedigree file to be uploaded in IDEA;

300 = bull national predicted genetic merit file (all traits);

301 = parameter to be used in the international genetic evaluation (all traits)

Validation files:

302 = data file for trendtest method 2

303 = data file for trendtest method 3

validation files should be used to run the conventional TrendTest software. The zip file produced by the software should be sent back to Interbull Centre before the end of each test run evaluation.

7.1.2 Only pedigree information as present in the IDEA website is used for the international evaluation. After the deadline for submission of data has passed the uploading functionality in IDEA is blocked by Interbull Centre staff and the whole IDEA pedigree content is extracted. Breed-specific pedigree files, in a sire-dam format, are then reconstructed starting from all animals having a predicted genetic merit for any submitted traits.

7.1.5 Data for the international evaluations will normally be individual trait national predicted genetic merits (estimated breeding value, transmitting ability, or relative breeding value (RBV)) of bulls in the country’s most recent national evaluation. The predicted genetic merits should be provided in the same way as it is officially, and publicly, defined and expressed (reference base and official unit of measurement). All traits submitted to Interbull Centre for international evaluations must be described in detail using Form GE (described in Appendix II and downloadable from Interbull website www.interbull.org).

Exceptions from these requirements may be accepted as part of Interbull standard procedures for a trait-group and specified in the appropriate section of Chapter 6 “Traits and breeds”.

7.1.6 Countries submitting their data in RBV are particularly requested to include 2 decimal points in the variables, as explained in the file formats. De-regression and international evaluation will consider data in the original unit of measurement, i.e. not as RBV’s, but, as part of the service, international predicted genetic merits will be converted to RBV prior to release.

Countries submitting their data in RBV should provide separately the formulae and coefficients for back-transformation to estimated breeding values or transmitting abilities. Coefficients should be provided each time they are updated by submitting a new version of the relevant appendix in the Form GE (described in Appendix II and downloadable from Interbull website www.interbull.org).

7.1.7 Bull records from the following breed groups can be sent to the Interbull Centre: Brown Swiss-type, Guernsey-type, Holstein-Friesian-type, Jersey-type, Milking Shorthorn-type, Pinzgauer-type, Red Dairy Cattle-type (including several Red-and-White breeds), Simmental (including Montbeliarde)-type, and non-Red Dairy Cattle Red or Red-and-White-type breeds (e.g. MRY). Other breed groups will be added in the future if needed. Bulls should be classified under one of the above breed groups according to the definition given in each country, e.g. Red Holsteins could be categorized as Holstein-Friesian (if evaluated together with Black & White in a country) or non-Red Dairy Cattle Red depending on the direction the population has taken in this country. Individual countries should identify the breed groups their populations belong to. In case of cross-breeding, the breed with the highest percentage should be considered. International evaluations will be computed within the Brown Swiss, Guernsey, Holstein-Friesian, Jersey, Red Dairy Cattle, and Simmental breed groups, while other breed groups may be added in the future if needed and if investigations have shown the feasibility of corresponding international evaluations.

7.1.8 Data on all bulls (domestic and imported) evaluated in the participating country with daughters in at least 10 herds should be sent to the Interbull Centre. Individual countries are responsible for identifying the records properly with respect to type of predicted genetic merit, status of predicted genetic merit, status of bull, etc, as identified in the file format descriptions.

7.1.9 Data from each country are expected to be “clean” from foreign daughter information. Participants are required to address that situation in their submitted files.

7.1.10 Organizations are required to upload data (predicted genetic merit and parameter) into IDEA website (username and password are provided separately to organizations participating in the international evaluation).

7.1.11 Additional information like percentage of red and GE Forms should be uploaded into Interbull Centre ftp server (username and password are provided separately to organizations participating in the international evaluation).

7.1.12 A detailed definition of the reference (genetic) base considered in the national genetic evaluation, as well as description of the base for age adjustment (if applicable), needs to be entered in the form GE (described in Appendix II and downloadable from Interbull website www.interbull.org) and accompany the data.

7.2 Data from the Interbull Centre to participating organizations:

7.2.1 One international predicted genetic merit file for each trait-group including bulls from all participating countries will be made available in each organization's own site on the Interbull Center FTP server together with information on the file format. The files will include bulls that are:

identified as officially publishable in at least one country;
bulls identified as part of a simultaneous progeny-testing program in at least 2 countries. International predicted genetic merits would be as defined in each country (estimated breeding value, transmitting ability, or relative breeding value) expressed in the relevant base and unit.

File formats are:

For Conventional MACE and GMACE:

030 = Interbull production predicted genetic merit file;

035 = Interbull conformation predicted genetic merit file;

135 = Interbull Brown Swiss conformation predicted genetic merit file;

036 =Interbull milk somatic cell and clinical mastitis predicted genetic merit file;

037 = Interbull longevity predicted genetic merit file;

038 = Interbull calving ease and stillbirth predicted genetic merit file;

039 = Interbull female fertility predicted genetic merit file.

040 = Interbull workability predicted genetic merit file.

For InterGenomics

InterGenomics files have no file code.

7.2.2 One file with international parent average reliability (ipr-files) and predicted parent averages for each trait-group including bulls from all participating organizations will be made available in each organization's own site on the Interbull FTP server together with information on the file format.

File formats are:

060 = Interbull production parent average reliability file;

065 = Interbull conformation parent average reliability file;

165 = Interbull Brown Swiss conformation parent average reliability file;

066 = Interbull milk somatic cell and clinical mastitis parent average reliability file;

067 = Interbull longevity parent average reliability file;

068 = Interbull calving ease and stillbirth parent average reliability file;

069 = Interbull female fertility parent average reliability file.

070 = Interbull workability parent average reliability file.

7.2.4 Each country providing data will receive evaluations for all breeds expressed on their base and scale.

7.2.5 Each country providing data will also receive evaluations for all bulls expressed on the base and scale of all other countries providing data. This information is not to be published by the country receiving it and may only be used for research and internal purposes.

7.2.6 A two-way table with conversion coefficients among all participating countries for all trait-groups evaluated, but subject to limitations identified in item 5.8, will be distributed.

7.2.7 Countries that do not participate with data, but wish to receive results from the international evaluation, will receive the same information as countries providing data. This information is not to be published by the country receiving it. It can only be used for research and internal purposes.

7.2.8 All participating organizations will have access to international pedigree files including all individual bulls. This information will be made available at the Interbull FTP server after each routine evaluation as one file per breed. The information in the pedigree file is strictly confidential and should be handled accordingly, and should only be used to prevent and to resolve identity problems.

7.2.9 Individual countries will be responsible for publishing results of the international evaluations according to own national requirements; publications should distinguish between national predicted genetic merits, international predicted genetic merits and national predicted genetic merits converted using the Interbull conversion factors.

All countries are expected to honor the Interbull “Guidelines for minimum requirements for advertising genetic merit of dairy animals” (Appendix V), and to enforce conformance with the Guidelines by all appropriate agencies at the national and international level.

7.3 Time of evaluations and deadlines:

7.3.1 Routine conventional and genomic international evaluations will be computed three times per year, in April, August and December. Test evaluation runs will be computed two times per year, in January and September.

7.3.2 Participating organizations should send their data for MACE routine evaluations to the IDEA database no later than by the Tuesday 21 days prior to a scheduled release of results. Submission of data for GMACE routine evaluations to IDEA database should be no later than by the Tuesday 14 days prior to a scheduled release of results. The definitive deadline for sending data is at 17:00 CET, but countries are encouraged to send data at earliest possible opportunity, since it would allow more time for checking and verification of the data, and communicating about possible inconsistencies. The most recent, correct, national evaluation file received by the deadline will be used in the international evaluations.

7.3.3 The target time for release of results for official publication is on the first Tuesday in April, the first Tuesday in August and the first Tuesday in December. The earliest possible official publication of results is at 07:00 local time, on the scheduled Tuesday. Target time for a confidential pre‑release of MACE evaluation results to countries having signed the “Interbull evaluation pre‑release agreement” (Appendix VI) is on the Thursday, 12:00 Central European Time (CET), 12 days prior to the scheduled release. Target time for a confidential pre‑release of GMACE evaluation results to countries having signed the “Interbull evaluation pre‑release agreement” (Appendix VI) is on the Wednesday, 12:00 Central European Time (CET), 6 days prior to the scheduled release. The pre‑release of evaluation results is strictly confidential and the sole intent is for checking of results, but it also provides the opportunity for countries to pre‑process the data prior to official release. The Interbull Centre may decide to release new evaluation results if a re-run is necessary, due to errors in procedures at the Centre or in national data discovered by the Centre or by a member after the pre-release. The Interbull Centre should send a report to all members on the likelihood that the Tuesday morning release will be possible to keep, no later than Friday, 17:00 CET.

7.3.4 Data submitted for test evaluation runs (items 4.1.2 and 4.2.4) should be sent by each new country, and by each country introducing changes in national evaluations, not later than 17:00 CET four weeks after the release of August and seven weeks after the release of December routine evaluations.

7.4 Test-run evaluation policy

7.4.1 Test-run evaluations intend to investigate the impact of new or modified national genetic evaluation results on the international evaluation; also to investigate potential improvements of the international genetic evaluation procedure. Results of such test-runs are reviewed by technical representatives of all countries involved. Pending on this review, changes are incorporated in the following routine evaluation.

7.4.2 Test-runs will be conducted in January and September at the Interbull Centre. The January test-run intends to investigate changes with the view to introduce them in the April routine evaluation of the same year. The September test-run intends to investigate changes with the view to introduce them in the December routine evaluation of the same year. More in general, partecipation in a test evaluation run with modified data implies that an official implementation of the modification is targeted for a near future, usually within 6 months.

7.4.3 Participating countries are requested to consider potential changes/modifications of their national genetic evaluation procedure in line with the above-mentioned time schedule.

7.4.4 Guidelines for assessing the necessity of a test-run:

MACE Test run	1- Do any of the following applies? (if not Go To 2) National EBV from a new country / breed / trait -> Go To 3 Two years since the last validation -> Verify program (check for consistency) -> Go To 2 National EBV from a new model -> Verify program (check for consistency) -> Go To 2 2- Check the consistency of the data by the “verify” program Large discrepancy -> Require explanation -> Accept data -> Go To 3 Medium discrepancy -> Require explanation -> Accept the data -> Go To 3 Small discrepancy -> Accept the data -> Go To 3 3- Estimate the genetic variance using the REML method National data -> Estimate r_G -> MACE EBV -> Go To 4 4- Are the validation tests required? National EBV from a new country / breed / trait¹ -> Validation tests I-III (IV) -> Must pass Two years since the last validation -> Validation tests I-III (IV) -> Must pass National EBV from a new model ⁽²⁾ (if Δ_G> 5%) -> Validation tests I-III (IV) -> Must pass
MACE Routine run	5- Check the consistency of the data by the “verify” program National EBV from a validated model -> Verify program (check for consistency) -> Go To 6 6- Are the results of the “verify” program consistent with the results of the previous run? Large discrepancy -> Reject the data -> to be submitted to a test run -> Go To 1 Medium discrepancy -> Require explanation -> Reject/Accept the data -> Go To 1 or 7 Small discrepancy -> Accept data -> REML (check for consistency) -> Go To 7 7- Estimate the genetic variance using the REML method, and check for consistency (how large is Δ_G?) Large discrepancy -> Reject the data -> Revert to the last accepted data -> MACE EBV Medium discrepancy -> Require explanation -> Reject data -> Revert to the last accepted data ->MACE EBV Medium discrepancy -> Require explanation -> Accept data -> MACE EBV Small discrepancy -> Accept data -> MACE EBV
GMACE Test run	8- Do any of the following rules applicable? (if not -> Go To 9) National GEBV from a new country / breed / trait ⁽¹⁾ -> GEBV-test -> Must pass -> Go To 9 Two years since the last GEBV-test -> GEBV-test -> Must pass -> Go To 9 New GEBV model -> GEBV-test -> Must pass -> Go To 9 9- Including data in GMACE Accept data -> GMACE
GMACE Routine run	10- Check the consistency of the data by the “Gverify” program National GEBV (validated in a previous GEBV-test, and based on the same national EBV as in MACE) -> Gverify (check for consistency) -> Go To 11 11- Including data in GMACE Large discrepancy -> Reject the data -> Revert to the last accepted data -> Go To 10 Medium discrepancy -> Require explanation -> Reject/Accept the data Small discrepancy -> Accept data -> GMACE

7.4.4.1 Changes in models for genetic parameter and breeding value estimation and modification of pre-adjustment factors, such as age, require new validation according to the established procedure and a test-run before acceptance to a routine international evaluation.

7.4.4.2 Frequently countries introduce changes in their system with only minor effect on the national bull ranking. Such changes, however, may have considerable impact on international evaluations.One way to assess this would be to estimate the within-country sire variance with the procedure currently used by Interbull. Large changes of this parameter are invariably associated with substantial re-ranking in the international list.

7.4.4.3 Experience shows that changes in sire variance estimates (based on data included in the international evaluation) larger than 5% from one evaluation to the next can not be explained by added information from young bulls. In such case, validations and a test-run will be required.

-  ⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2012-02-23 11:24:35 → 
  Size: 13978
  Editor: Valentina
  Comment:
+   ← Revision 29 as of 2016-06-03 11:03:40 → ⇥
  Size: 21048
  Editor: Valentina
  Comment:
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 1:
-== 7. Data Exchange and time of evaluation ==
7.1 Data '''from participating organisations to the Interbull Centre:'''
+## page was renamed from CoP_chapter7
= 7. Interbull CoP - Data Exchange and time of evaluation =
==== 7.1 Data from participating organizations to the Interbull Centre: ====
7.1.1 Each participating organization is expected to provide:
-Line 4:
+Line 6:
-.1.1 Each participating organisation is expected to provide a) a pedigree and national dairy-production predicted genetic merit file, b) trait specific predicted genetic merit files for each additional trait-group the country participates with data in the international evaluations, and c) file(s) with parameters to be used in the international genetic evalaution. Countries are also expected to provide files for genetic trend validation by the Interbull Centre whenever (major) changes in national evaluations require that data is submitted for a test evaluation run, or when the previous genetic trend validation was more than two years ago. Files should be provided according to the applicable formats (Appendix VI):
+ a. A pedigree in a sire-dam format to be uploaded into the IDEA (Interbull Data Exchange Area) website,
 a. Predicted genetic merit file for any trait the country participates with data in the international evaluations, and
 a. File with parameters to be used in the international genetic evaluation.
 a. All above files must be checked by the relevant checking program available inside IDEA
 a. The .zip file produced for the pedigree and/or for the predicted genetic merit file plus parameter needs to be uploaded into IDEA
-Line 6:
+Line 12:
-= bull pedigree and national dairy‑production predicted genetic merit file;
+Countries are also expected to prepare files for genetic validation whenever (major) changes in national evaluations require that data is submitted for a test evaluation run, or when the previous genetic validation was done more than two years ago.  Files should be prepared according to the applicable formats available in the Interbull webpage [[http://www.interbull.org/index|www.interbull.org]]
-Line 8:
+Line 14:
-= bull national conformation predicted genetic merit file;
+= pedigree file to be uploaded in IDEA;
-Line 10:
+Line 16:
-= bull national Brown Swiss conformation predicted genetic merit file;
+= bull national predicted genetic merit file (all traits);
-Line 12:
+Line 18:
-= bull national milk somatic cell and clinical mastitis predicted genetic merit file;
+= parameter to be used in the international genetic evaluation (all traits)
-Line 14:
+Line 20:
-= bull national longevity predicted genetic merit file;
+Validation files:
-Line 16:
+Line 22:
-= bull national calving ease and stillbirth predicted genetic merit file;
+= data file for trendtest method 2
-Line 18:
+Line 24:
-= bull national female fertility predicted genetic merit file;
+= data file for trendtest method 3
-Line 20:
+Line 26:
-= file for genetic trend validation (dairy‑production);
+validation files should be used to run the conventional [[https://wiki.interbull.org/public/TrendTest_Software?action=print&rev=42|TrendTest]] software. The zip file  produced by the software should be sent back to Interbull Centre before  the end of each test run evaluation.
-Line 22:
+Line 28:
-= file for genetic trend validation (conformation);
+.1.2 Only pedigree information as present in the IDEA website is used for the international evaluation. After the deadline for submission of data has passed the uploading functionality in IDEA is blocked by Interbull Centre staff and the whole IDEA pedigree content is extracted. Breed-specific pedigree files, in a sire-dam format, are then reconstructed starting from all animals having a predicted genetic merit for any submitted traits.
-Line 24:
+Line 30:
-= file for genetic trend validation (milk somatic cell and clinical mastitis)
+.1.5 Data for the international evaluations will normally be individual trait national predicted genetic merits (estimated breeding value, transmitting ability, or relative breeding value (RBV)) of bulls in the country’s most recent national evaluation. The predicted genetic merits should be provided in the same way as it is officially, and publicly, defined and expressed (reference base and official unit of measurement). All traits submitted to Interbull Centre for international evaluations must be described in detail using ''Form GE'' (described in ''Appendix II'' and downloadable from Interbull website [[http://www.interbull.org/index|www.interbull.org]]).
-Line 26:
+Line 32:
-= file for genetic trend validation (longevity);

048 = file for genetic trend validation (calving ease and stillbirth);

049 = file for genetic trend validation (female fertility);

File with parameters to be used in the international genetic evaluation (all traits).

7.1.2 The pedigree and national dairy-production file (file format 010) should include all bulls that have a national genetic evaluation for any trait-group, since this information is used to provide pedigree information in the international genetic evaluation for all trait-groups. Domestic bulls that appear in the pedigree of bulls as sires or maternal grand-sires should also be provided in the pedigree and national dairy-production file, even if they have no evaluation of their own, since it improves the completeness of the pedigree information. Bulls that do not have a national genetic evaluation for dairy-production traits should have number of daughters, EDC, and herds set to zero and national genetic evaluation fields identified as missing (as defined in the file format descriptions).

The national identification, as provided in the pedigree and national dairy-production file must never change, since it is used to provide the link between the international identification(s) in the cross-reference files maintained by the Interbull Centre. Any change in the national identification must be communicated to the Interbull Centre before implementation (item 4.1.11).

7.1.3 Countries are encouraged to provide young bulls that do not yet have any national genetic evaluation in the pedigree and national dairy-production file, as soon as the identity information is stable and reliable. Number of daughters, EDC, and herds should be set to zero and national genetic evaluation fields identified as missing for such bulls. Information on such bulls is useful to resolve problems with international identifications of bulls even before a bull is included in a first international genetic evaluation.

7.1.4 Countries are also encouraged to provide records of domestic bulls that may appear in an importing country, in the pedigree and national dairy-production file even if the bull does not have a national genetic evaluation for any trait-group. Number of daughters, EDC, and herds should be set to zero and national genetic evaluation fields identified as missing for such bulls.

7.1.5 Data for the international evaluations will normally be individual trait national predicted genetic merits (estimated breeding value, transmitting ability, or relative breeding value (RBV)) of bulls in the country’s most recent national evaluation. The predicted genetic merits should be provided in the same way as it is officially, and publicly, defined and expressed (reference base and official unit of measurement). All traits submitted to Interbull for international evaluations must be described in detail using Form GE (Appendix II).

Exceptions from these requirements may be accepted if part of Interbull standard procedures for a trait-group and specified in the appropriate section of Chapter 6 “Traits and breeds”.
+Exceptions from these requirements may be accepted as part of Interbull standard procedures for a trait-group and specified in the appropriate section of Chapter 6 “Traits and breeds”.
-Line 48:
+Line 36:
- . Countries submitting their data in RBV should provide separately the formulae and coefficients for back-transformation to estimated breeding values or transmitting abilities. Coefficients should be provided each time they are updated by submitting a new version of the relevant appendix to Form GE. 7.1.7 Bull records from the following breed groups can be sent to the Interbull Centre: Brown Swiss type, Guernsey type, Holstein-Friesian type, Jersey type, Milking Shorthorn type, Pinzgauer type, Red Dairy Cattle type (including several Red-and-White breeds), Simmental (including Montbeliarde) type, and non-Red Dairy Cattle Red or Red-and-White type breeds (e.g. MRY). Other breed groups will be added in the future if needed. Bulls should be classified under one of the above breed groups according to the definition given in each country, e.g. Red Holsteins could be categorized as Holstein-Friesian (if evaluated together with Black & White in a country) or non-Red Dairy Cattle Red depending on the direction the population has taken in this country. Individual countries should identify the breed groups their populations belong to. In cases of cross-breeding, the breed with the highest percentage should be considered. International evaluations will be computed within the Brown Swiss, Guernsey, Holstein-Friesian, Jersey, Red Dairy Cattle, and Simmental breed groups, while other breed groups may be added in the future if needed and if investigations have shown the feasibility of corresponding international evaluations
+Countries submitting their data in RBV should provide separately the formulae and coefficients for back-transformation to estimated breeding values or transmitting abilities. Coefficients should be provided each time they are updated by submitting a new version of the relevant appendix in the ''Form GE'' (described in ''Appendix II'' and downloadable from Interbull website [[http://www.interbull.org/index|www.interbull.org]]).
-Line 50:
+Line 38:
-.1.8 Data on all bulls (domestic and imported) evaluated in the participating country with daughters in at least 10 herds (see also 7.1.2, 7.1.3 and 7.1.4) should be sent to the Interbull Centre. Individual countries are responsible for identifying the records properly with respect to type of predicted genetic merit, status of predicted genetic merit, status of bull, etc, as identified in the file format descriptions.
+.1.7 Bull records from the following breed groups can be sent to the Interbull Centre: Brown Swiss-type, Guernsey-type, Holstein-Friesian-type, Jersey-type, Milking Shorthorn-type, Pinzgauer-type, Red Dairy Cattle-type (including several Red-and-White breeds), Simmental (including Montbeliarde)-type, and non-Red Dairy Cattle Red or Red-and-White-type breeds (e.g. MRY). Other breed groups will be added in the future if needed. Bulls should be classified under one of the above breed groups according to the definition given in each country, e.g. Red Holsteins could be categorized as Holstein-Friesian (if evaluated together with Black & White in a country) or non-Red Dairy Cattle Red depending on the direction the population has taken in this country. Individual countries should identify the breed groups their populations belong to. In case of cross-breeding, the breed with the highest percentage should be considered. International evaluations will be computed within the Brown Swiss, Guernsey, Holstein-Friesian, Jersey, Red Dairy Cattle, and Simmental breed groups, while other breed groups may be added in the future if needed and if investigations have shown the feasibility of corresponding international evaluations.

7.1.8 Data on all bulls (domestic and imported) evaluated in the participating country with daughters in at least 10 herds should be sent to the Interbull Centre. Individual countries are responsible for identifying the records properly with respect to type of predicted genetic merit, status of predicted genetic merit, status of bull, etc, as identified in the file format descriptions.
-Line 54:
+Line 44:
-.1.10 Organisations with access to computer networks are encouraged to transfer data electronically to the FTP server of Interbull Centre at ftp-interbull.hgen.slu.se (username and password are provided separately to organisations participating in the international evaluation). Files with data should be identified with file-type, date of creation, and country sending the data, and breed of evaluation when applicable, e.g. file010.20030630.nld or file115bsw. 20030630.ita.
+.1.10 Organizations are required to upload data (predicted genetic merit and parameter) into IDEA website (username and password are provided separately to organizations participating in the international evaluation).
-Line 56:
+Line 46:
-The parameter file should be named parameter{brd}.{date of creation}.{cou}. These parameter files shall be submitted at the same time as the files with national evaluation results (01x-format files) An e‑mail message (or fax) with file name, file size, number of lines, and results of data quality checks (see 4.1.1) should be sent to the Interbull Centre when files are transferred.
+.1.11 Additional information like percentage of red and GE Forms should be uploaded into Interbull Centre ftp server (username and password are provided separately to organizations participating in the international evaluation).
-Line 58:
+Line 48:
-.1.11 A detailed definition of the reference (genetic) base considered in the national genetic evaluation, as well as description of the base for age adjustment (if applicable), needs to be entered in form GE (Appendix II) and accompany the data, when identified in the file format descriptions.
+.1.12 A detailed definition of the reference (genetic) base considered in the national genetic evaluation, as well as description of the base for age adjustment (if applicable), needs to be entered in the ''form GE'' (described in ''Appendix II'' and downloadable from Interbull website [[http://www.interbull.org/index|www.interbull.org]]) and accompany the data.
-Line 60:
+Line 50:
-.2 '''Data from the Interbull Centre to participating organisations:'''
+==== 7.2 Data from the Interbull Centre to participating organizations: ====
7.2.1 One international predicted genetic merit file for each trait-group including bulls from all participating countries will be made available in each organization's own site on the Interbull Center FTP server together with information on the file format. The files will include bulls that are:
-Line 62:
+Line 53:
-.2.1 One international predicted genetic merit file for each trait-group including bulls from all participating countries will be distributed back to each organisation together with information on the file format. The files will include bulls that are a) identified as officially publishable in at least one country; b) bulls identified as part of a simultaneous progeny-testing programme in at least 2 countries. International predicted genetic merits would be as defined in each country (estimated breeding value, transmitting ability, or relative breeding value) expressed in the relevant base and unit. File formats are:
+ a. identified as officially publishable in at least one country;
 a. bulls identified as part of a simultaneous progeny-testing program in at least 2 countries. International predicted genetic merits would be as defined in each country (estimated breeding value, transmitting ability, or relative breeding value) expressed in the relevant base and unit.
-Line 64:
+Line 56:
-= Interbull pedigree and dairy‑production predicted genetic merit file;
+<<BR>> File formats are:

 * For Conventional MACE and GMACE:

030 = Interbull production predicted genetic merit file;
-Line 78:
+Line 74:
-.2.3 Each country providing data will receive evaluations for all breeds expressed on their base and scale.
+= Interbull workability predicted genetic merit file.
-Line 80:
+Line 76:
-.2.4 Each country providing data will also receive evaluations for all bulls expressed on the base and scale of all other countries providing data. This information is not to be published by the country receiving it and may only be used for research and internal purposes.
+ * For !InterGenomics
-Line 82:
+Line 78:
-.2.5 A two-way table with conversion coefficients among all participating countries for all trait-groups evaluated, but subject to limitations identified in item 5.8, will be distributed.
+!InterGenomics files have no file code.
-Line 84:
+Line 80:
-.2.6 Countries that do not participate with data, but wish to receive results from the international evaluation, will receive the same information as countries providing data. This information is not to be published by the country receiving it. It can only be used for research and internal purposes.
+.2.2 One file with international parent average reliability (ipr-files) and predicted parent averages for each trait-group including bulls from all participating organizations will be made available in each organization's own site on the Interbull FTP server together with information on the file format.
-Line 86:
+Line 82:
-.2.7 All participating organisations will have access to international pedigree files including all individual bulls provided in the pedigree and national dairy-production predicted genetic merit files. This information will be made available at the Interbull FTP server after each routine evaluation as one file per breed. The files will be password protected, with passwords known only to participants in the international evaluation. The information in the pedigree file is strictly confidential and should be handled accordingly, and should only be used to prevent and to resolve identity problems.''' '''
+File formats are:
-Line 88:
+Line 84:
-.2.8 Individual countries will be responsible for publishing results of the international evaluations according to own national requirements; publications should distinguish between national predicted genetic merits, international predicted genetic merits and national predicted genetic merits converted using the Interbull conversion factors.
+= Interbull production parent average reliability file;
-Line 90:
+Line 86:
-All countries are expected to honour the Interbull “Guidelines for minimum requirements for advertising genetic merit of dairy animals” (Appendix VII), and to enforce conformance with the Guidelines by all appropriate agencies at the national and international level.
+= Interbull conformation parent average reliability file;
-Line 92:
+Line 88:
-.3 Time of evaluations and deadlines:
+= Interbull Brown Swiss conformation parent average reliability file;
-Line 94:
+Line 90:
-.3.1 Routine international evaluations will be computed three times per year, in April, August and December. Test evaluation runs will be computed two times per year, in January and September.
+= Interbull milk somatic cell and clinical mastitis parent average reliability file;
-Line 96:
+Line 92:
-.3.2 Participating organisations should send their data for routine evaluations to the Interbull Centre no later than by the Tuesday 14 days prior to a scheduled release of results. The definitive deadline for receiving data is at 17:00 CET, but countries are encouraged to send data at earliest possible opportunity, since it would allow more time for checking and verification of the data, and communicating about possible inconsistencies. The most recent, correct, national evaluation file received by the deadline will be used in the international evaluations.
+= Interbull longevity parent average reliability file;
-Line 98:
+Line 94:
-.3.3 The target time for release of results for official publication is on the first Tuesday after January 11, the first Tuesday in April and the third Tuesday in August. The earliest possible official publication of results is at 07:00 local time, on the scheduled Tuesday. Target time for a confidential pre‑release of evaluation results to countries having signed the “Interbull evaluation pre‑release agreement” (Appendix VIII) is on the Thursday, 12:00 Central European Time (CET), 5 days prior to the scheduled release. The pre‑release of evaluation results is strictly confidential and the sole intent is for checking of results, but it also provides the opportunity for countries to pre‑process the data prior to official release. The Interbull Centre may decide to release new evaluation results if a re-run is necessary, due to errors in procedures at the Centre or in national data discovered by the Centre or by a member after the pre-release. The Interbull Centre should send a report to all members on the likelihood that the Tuesday morning release will be possible to keep, no later than Friday, 17:00 CET.
+= Interbull calving ease and stillbirth parent average reliability file;
-Line 100:
+Line 96:
-.3.4 Data submitted for test evaluation runs (items 4.1.2 and 4.2.4) should be sent by each new country, and by each country that introduces changes in national evaluations, not later than 17:00 CET three weeks after the release of April and August routine evaluations.
+= Interbull female fertility parent average reliability file.

070 = Interbull workability parent average reliability file.

7.2.4 Each country providing data will receive evaluations for all breeds expressed on their base and scale.

7.2.5 Each country providing data will also receive evaluations for all bulls expressed on the base and scale of all other countries providing data. This information is not to be published by the country receiving it and may only be used for research and internal purposes.

7.2.6 A two-way table with conversion coefficients among all participating countries for all trait-groups evaluated, but subject to limitations identified in item 5.8, will be distributed.

7.2.7 Countries that do not participate with data, but wish to receive results from the international evaluation, will receive the same information as countries providing data. This information is not to be published by the country receiving it. It can only be used for research and internal purposes.

7.2.8 All participating organizations will have access to international pedigree files including all individual bulls. This information will be made available at the Interbull FTP server after each routine evaluation as one file per breed. The information in the pedigree file is strictly confidential and should be handled accordingly, and should only be used to prevent and to resolve identity problems.

7.2.9 Individual countries will be responsible for publishing results of the international evaluations according to own national requirements; publications should distinguish between national predicted genetic merits, international predicted genetic merits and national predicted genetic merits converted using the Interbull conversion factors.

All countries are expected to honor the Interbull “Guidelines for minimum requirements for advertising genetic merit of dairy animals” (Appendix V), and to enforce conformance with the Guidelines by all appropriate agencies at the national and international level.

==== 7.3 Time of evaluations and deadlines: ====
7.3.1 Routine conventional and genomic international evaluations will be computed three times per year, in April, August and December. Test evaluation runs will be computed two times per year, in January and September.

7.3.2 Participating organizations should send their data for '''MACE''' routine evaluations to the IDEA database no later than by the Tuesday 21 days prior to a scheduled release of results. Submission of data for '''GMACE''' routine evaluations to IDEA database should be no later than by the Tuesday 14 days prior to a scheduled release of results. The definitive deadline for sending data is at 17:00 CET, but countries are encouraged to send data at earliest possible opportunity, since it would allow more time for checking and verification of the data, and communicating about possible inconsistencies. The most recent, correct, national evaluation file received by the deadline will be used in the international evaluations.

7.3.3 The target time for release of results for official publication is on the first Tuesday in April, the first Tuesday in August and  the first Tuesday in December. The earliest possible official publication of results is at 07:00 local time, on the scheduled Tuesday. Target time for a confidential pre‑release of '''MACE''' evaluation results to countries having signed the “Interbull evaluation pre‑release agreement” (Appendix VI) is on the Thursday, 12:00 Central European Time (CET), 12 days prior to the scheduled release. Target time for a confidential pre‑release of '''GMACE''' evaluation results to countries having signed the “Interbull evaluation pre‑release agreement” (Appendix VI) is on the Wednesday, 12:00 Central European Time (CET), 6 days prior to the scheduled release. The pre‑release of evaluation results is strictly confidential and the sole intent is for checking of results, but it also provides the opportunity for countries to pre‑process the data prior to official release. The Interbull Centre may decide to release new evaluation results if a re-run is necessary, due to errors in procedures at the Centre or in national data discovered by the Centre or by a member after the pre-release. The Interbull Centre should send a report to all members on the likelihood that the Tuesday morning release will be possible to keep, no later than Friday, 17:00 CET.

7.3.4 Data submitted for test evaluation runs (items 4.1.2 and 4.2.4) should be sent by each new country, and by each country introducing changes in national evaluations, not later than 17:00 CET four weeks after the release of August and seven weeks after the release of December routine evaluations.

==== 7.4 Test-run evaluation policy ====
7.4.1 Test-run evaluations intend to investigate the impact of new or modified national genetic evaluation results on the international evaluation; also to investigate potential improvements of the international genetic evaluation procedure. Results of such test-runs are reviewed by technical representatives of all countries involved. Pending on this review, changes are incorporated in the following routine evaluation.

7.4.2 Test-runs will be conducted in January and September at the Interbull Centre. The January test-run intends to investigate changes with the view to introduce them in the April routine evaluation of the same year. The September test-run intends to investigate changes with the view to introduce them in the December routine evaluation of the same year. More in general, partecipation in a test evaluation run with modified data implies that  an official implementation of the modification is targeted for a near  future, usually within 6 months.

7.4.3 Participating countries are requested to consider potential changes/modifications of their national genetic evaluation procedure in line with the above-mentioned time schedule.

==== 7.4.4 Guidelines for assessing the necessity of a test-run: ====
||<tablewidth="775px" tableheight="754px" tablestyle="border-collapse:collapse;border:medium none;  " tableclass="MsoNormalTable"rowstyle="mso-yfti-irow:0;mso-yfti-firstrow:yes;page-break-inside:avoid"14%  style="border:solid windowtext 1.0pt;mso-border-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;vertical-align:top">'''MACE ''' '''Test   run''' ||<85%  style="border:solid windowtext 1.0pt;border-left:none;mso-border-left-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;vertical-align:top">'''1- Do any of the following applies?   (if not ''''''Go To 2) ''' <<BR>>National EBV from a new country /   breed / trait -> Go To 3 <<BR>>Two years since the last validation ->  Verify program (check for consistency) -> Go To 2 <<BR>>National EBV from a new model -> Verify program (check for consistency) -> Go To 2 '''<<BR>>''''''<<BR>>2- Check the consistency of the data   by the “verify” program''' <<BR>>Large discrepancy -> Require explanation -> Accept data -> Go To 3 <<BR>>Medium discrepancy -> Require explanation -> Accept the data -> Go To 3 <<BR>>Small discrepancy -> Accept the data -> Go To 3<<BR>><<BR>> '''3- Estimate the genetic variance   using the REML method''' <<BR>>National data -> Estimate r,,G,, -> MACE EBV -> Go   To 4 '''<<BR>>''''''<<BR>>4- Are the validation tests required?''' <<BR>>National EBV from a new country /   breed / trait^1^ ->   Validation tests I-III (IV) -> Must   pass <<BR>>Two years since the last   validation ->  Validation tests I-III (IV) -> Must pass <<BR>>National EBV from a new model ^(2)^   (if Δ,,G,,> 5%) ->  Validation tests I-III (IV) -> Must pass ||
||<rowstyle="mso-yfti-irow:1;page-break-inside:avoid"14%  style="border:solid windowtext 1.0pt;border-top:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;vertical-align:top">'''MACE''' '''Routine   run''' ||<85%  style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;border-right:solid windowtext 1.0pt;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;mso-border-left-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;vertical-align:top">'''5- Check the consistency of the data   by the “verify” program''' <<BR>>National EBV from a validated model -> Verify program (check for consistency) -> Go To 6 <<BR>><<BR>>'''6- Are the results of the “verify”   program consistent with the results of the previous run?''' <<BR>>Large discrepancy -> Reject the data -> to be submitted to a test run -> Go To 1 <<BR>>Medium discrepancy -> Require explanation -> Reject/Accept the data -> Go To 1 or 7 <<BR>>Small discrepancy -> Accept data -> REML (check for consistency) -> Go To 7 '''<<BR>>''''''<<BR>>7- Estimate the genetic variance   using the REML method, and check for consistency (how large is Δ,,G,,?)''' <<BR>>Large discrepancy -> Reject the data -> Revert to the last accepted data -> MACE EBV <<BR>>Medium discrepancy -> Require explanation -> Reject data -> Revert to the last accepted data ->MACE EBV <<BR>>Medium discrepancy -> Require explanation -> Accept data -> MACE EBV <<BR>>Small discrepancy -> Accept data -> MACE EBV ||
||<rowstyle="mso-yfti-irow:2;page-break-inside:avoid"14%  style="border:solid windowtext 1.0pt;border-top:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;vertical-align:top">'''GMACE''' '''Test   run''' ||<85%  style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;border-right:solid windowtext 1.0pt;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;mso-border-left-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;vertical-align:top">'''8- Do any of the following rules   applicable? (if not ''''''->'''''' Go To 9)''' ''' ''' <<BR>>National GEBV from a new country /   breed / trait ^(1)^ ->   GEBV-test -> Must pass -> Go   To 9 <<BR>>Two years since the last   GEBV-test -> GEBV-test -> Must   pass -> Go To 9 <<BR>>New GEBV model -> GEBV-test -> Must   pass -> Go To 9 '''<<BR>>''''''<<BR>>9- Including data in GMACE''' <<BR>>Accept data -> GMACE ||
||<rowstyle="mso-yfti-irow:3;mso-yfti-lastrow:yes;page-break-inside:avoid"14%  style="border:solid windowtext 1.0pt;border-top:none;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;vertical-align:top">'''GMACE''' '''Routine   run''' ||<85%  style="border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;border-right:solid windowtext 1.0pt;mso-border-top-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;mso-border-left-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;mso-border-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;vertical-align:top">'''10- Check the consistency of the data   by the “Gverify” program''' <<BR>>National GEBV (validated in a   previous GEBV-test, and based on the same national EBV as in MACE) -> Gverify (check for consistency) -> Go To 11 '''<<BR>>''''''<<BR>>11- Including data in GMACE''' <<BR>>Large discrepancy -> Reject the data -> Revert to the last accepted data -> Go To 10 <<BR>>Medium discrepancy -> Require explanation -> Reject/Accept the data <<BR>>Small discrepancy -> Accept data -> GMACE ||


7.4.4.1 Changes in models for genetic parameter and breeding value estimation and modification of pre-adjustment factors, such as age, require new validation according to the established procedure and a test-run before acceptance to a routine international evaluation.

7.4.4.2 Frequently countries introduce changes in their system with only minor effect on the national bull ranking. Such changes, however, may have considerable impact on international evaluations.One way to assess this would be to estimate the within-country sire variance with the procedure currently used by Interbull. Large changes of this parameter are invariably associated with substantial re-ranking in the international list.

7.4.4.3 Experience shows that changes in sire variance estimates (based on data included in the international evaluation) larger than 5% from one evaluation to the next can not be explained by added information from young bulls. In such case, validations and a test-run will be required.