Differences between revisions 14 and 15
Revision 14 as of 2015-12-02 13:57:27
Size: 34886
Editor: Valentina
Comment:
Revision 15 as of 2021-06-09 13:48:30
Size: 34903
Editor: Valentina
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 34: Line 34:
 . ^3^Valid population codes: ARG AUS BEL CAN CHE ^a^CHR CZE ^b^DEA DEU ^c^DFS ^d^DNR ESP EST FIN FRA ^e^FRM ^f^FRR GBR HUN IRL ISR ITA JPN LTU LVA NLD NZL POL PRT SVN SVK SWE USA URY ZAF
  . where: ^a^Swiss Red Holstein; ^b^ Austria+Germany; ^c^Denmark + Finland + Sweden; ^d^Denmark Red Holstein ^e^ France Montbeliarde; ^f^French Pie Rouge
 . ^3^Valid population codes: ARG AUS BEL CAN CHE CZE ^a^DEA DEU ^b^DFS ESP EST FIN FRA ^c^FRM GBR HUN IRL ISR ITA JPN LTU LVA NLD NZL POL PRT SVN SVK SWE USA URY ZAF
  . where:  ^a^ Austria+Germany; ^b^Denmark + Finland + Sweden; ^c^ France Montbeliarde;
Line 45: Line 45:
  . <<span(style="color: #FF00FF;")>> SNP Training <<span>> ==> cma = clinical mastitis
Line 69: Line 70:
 . ^10^ <<span(style="color: #FF00FF;")>>''Production, conformation, udder health, fertility and workability traits:''<<span>> Weighting factor used for these traits is “the effective daughter contribution (EDC)”, which is described In the Interbull document Code of practice, Appendix IV, “Weighting factor for international genetic evaluation”, updated April 27, 2004. EDC values should be rounded to the nearest integer value.<<BR>>  . ^10^ <<span(style="color: #FF00FF;")>>''Production, conformation, udder health, fertility, workability, and SNP training traits:''<<span>> Weighting factor used for these traits is “the effective daughter contribution (EDC)”, which is described In the Interbull document Code of practice, Appendix IV, “Weighting factor for international genetic evaluation”, updated April 27, 2004. EDC values should be rounded to the nearest integer value.<<BR>>

APPENDIX I - Format File300-EBV and File700-GEBV

Col

Name

Start

Format

Description

Example

1

rec type

1

a3

Record type 1

300

2

brd_eval

5

a3

Breed of evaluation 2

HOL

3

pop

9

a3

Population code 3

USA

4

trt

13

a3

Trait of evaluation 4

mil

5

brd_anim

17

a3

Breed of animal

HOL

6

cou_orig

20

a3

Country of first registration

USA

7

sex

23

a1

Sex of animal

M

8

id_no

24

a12

Animal identification number

003000336289

9

typ_prf

37

i2

Type of proof 5

11

10

off_pub

40

a1

Official publicationof proof 6

Y

11

status

42

i2

Animal status 7

10

12

ndau

44

i8

Number of daughters 8

115

13

nhrd

52

i8

Number of herds 9

75

14

edc

60

i8

Number of effective daughter contributions 10

133

15

rel

69

f7.4

Repeatability/Reliability 11

82

16

ebv

76

f10.

National predicted genetic merit 12

2.780

  IMPORTANT NOTE !!!!!

  In the old fileformat 01x-020 and 115, the national proofs were multiplied by a factor: (prod=100; conf=100;udder=1000;long=1000;calv=1000;fert=1000; fert=1000;work=1000).  This multiplication will no longer be needed.
  • 1Valid record types:

    • 300 for EBV
    • 700 for GEBV
  • 2Breed codes accepted:

    • BSW=Brown Swiss type; GUE=Guernsey type; HOL=Holstein-Friesian (Black & White) type; JER=Jersey type; RDC=Red Dairy Cattle type ; SIM=Simmental type.

  • 3Valid population codes: ARG AUS BEL CAN CHE CZE aDEA DEU bDFS ESP EST FIN FRA cFRM GBR HUN IRL ISR ITA JPN LTU LVA NLD NZL POL PRT SVN SVK SWE USA URY ZAF

    • where: a Austria+Germany; bDenmark + Finland + Sweden; c France Montbeliarde;

  • 4Accepted traits abbreviations:

    • Production ==> mil = milk;fat =fat; pro = protein;

    • Conformation ==> sta = stature;cwi = chest width;bde = body depth;ang = angularity;ran = rump angle;rwi = rump width; rls = rear-leg set;rlr = rear-leg rear view;fan = foot angle;hde = heel depth/hoof height; fua = fore udder attachment; ruh = rear udder height; ruw = rear udder width; usu = udder support;ude = udder depth;ftp = front teat placement;ftl = (front) teat length;rtp = rear teat placement;ous = overall udder score; ofl = overall feet&legs score; ocs = overall conformation score; bcs = body condition score; loc = locomotion;

    • Udder ==>scs = somatic cell; mas = mastitis

    • Longevity ==> dlo = direct longevity;

    • Calving ==> dce = direct calving ease;mce = maternal calving ease;dsb= direct stillbirth;msb = maternal stillbirth

    • Female fertility ==>hco = heifer conception;crc = cow recycling;cc1 = lactating cow's ability to conceive (1);cc2 = lactating cow's ability to conceive (2);int= internval traits

    • Workability ==> msp = milking speed;tem = temperament

    • SNP Training ==> cma = clinical mastitis

  • 5Accepted codes:

    • 00 (unknown);

    • 11 (based on first crop sampling daughters);

    • 12 (based on first and second crop daughters);

    • 13 (based on parent average and genomic information only);

    • 21(based on imported semen of proven bull, second crop daughters only);

    • 22 (based on mostly, more than 50%, imported daughters or daughters born from imported embryos.)

  • 6Accepted abbreviations:

    • Y (if bull proof meets national standards for official publication in the country sending information.);

    • P (if bull is part of a simultaneous progeny-testing program, but the proof does not yet meet national standards for official publication);

    • N (otherwise).

  • 7Valid codes for status of bulls:

    • 00(unknown);

    • 10(bull randomly sampled through an official AI scheme);

    • 15 (young bull, genomically tested, not yet selected for AI);

    • 20(other bull. Records with “20” in this file will be excluded from the international evaluation, unless type of proof is “21”).

  • 8Field for number of daughters should be positive. For missing value put 0.

  • 9Field for number of herds should be positive. For missing value put 0.

  • 10 Production, conformation, udder health, fertility, workability, and SNP training traits: Weighting factor used for these traits is “the effective daughter contribution (EDC)”, which is described In the Interbull document Code of practice, Appendix IV, “Weighting factor for international genetic evaluation”, updated April 27, 2004. EDC values should be rounded to the nearest integer value.

    • Calving: The weighting factors used for calving traits it the total number of calvings for the direct effects and number of daughters with calving for maternal effect

    • Longevity: The weighting factor used for longevity traits depends on the national genetic evaluation model. For linear models the weighting factor is the same as described above for conformation, fertility, production, udder health and workability traits. For survival models number of culled daughters is used as the weighting factor.

  • 11Reliability values are nationally calculated reliability values expressed in percents with 4 decimials. For missing value put 0.

  • 12National predicted genetic merit values published domestically. For threshold models the submitted values are from the underlying scale. For missing values put 9999999999. Please note! In the old fileformat 01x-020 and 115, the national proofs were multiplied by a factor: (prod=100; conf=100;udder=1000;long=1000;calv=1000;fert=1000; fert=1000;work=1000). This multiplication will no longer be needed.

public/File300 (last edited 2023-08-08 12:18:08 by Valentina)