|
Size: 1210
Comment:
|
Size: 1591
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 6: | Line 6: |
| ||2||brd||5||a3||Breed of evaluation|| | ||2||brd||5||a3||Breed of evaluation (BSW/GUE/HOL/JER/RDC/SIM)|| |
| Line 17: | Line 17: |
| ||13||ebv||76||f10.4||National predicted genetic merit|| | ||13||ebv||76||f10.4||National predicted genetic merit || |
| Line 21: | Line 21: |
| * population code is the same as country code with the following exceptions * DEA for joint DEU/AUS evaluations in BSW and SIM evaluations * DFS for joint DNK/FIN/SWE evaluations in all breeds * FRR for French Pied Rouge in HOL evaluations * FRM for French Montbeliard in HOL evaluations * CHR for Swiss Red Holsteins in HOL evaluations |
Format300 for Submission of National Evaluations to IDEA
Col |
Name |
Start |
Format |
Description |
1 |
rec |
1 |
a3 |
Record type (300) |
2 |
brd |
5 |
a3 |
Breed of evaluation (BSW/GUE/HOL/JER/RDC/SIM) |
3 |
pop |
9 |
a3 |
Population code |
4 |
trt |
13 |
a3 |
Trait code |
5 |
anim |
17 |
a19 |
Animal international ID |
6 |
type_prf |
37 |
i2 |
Type of proof |
7 |
off_pub |
40 |
a1 |
Official publication of proof (Y/P/N) |
8 |
status |
42 |
i2 |
Bull status |
9 |
ndau |
44 |
i8 |
Number of daughters |
10 |
nhrd |
52 |
i8 |
Number of herds |
11 |
edc |
60 |
i8 |
Effective daughter contributions |
12 |
rel |
68 |
f8.4 |
Repeatability/Reliability |
13 |
ebv |
76 |
f10.4 |
National predicted genetic merit |
Notes:
- population code is the same as country code with the following exceptions
- DEA for joint DEU/AUS evaluations in BSW and SIM evaluations
- DFS for joint DNK/FIN/SWE evaluations in all breeds
- FRR for French Pied Rouge in HOL evaluations
- FRM for French Montbeliard in HOL evaluations
- CHR for Swiss Red Holsteins in HOL evaluations
- the rel field should be multiplied by 100 (eg. 95.6789)
- the ebv field may contain different numbers of decimals for different traits (eg. -1234.0000 for milk yield, 111.1000 fat, protein or functional traits, or 2.3400 for type traits); the aim should be to have a minimum of two complete significant digits in the range of proofs, but more is even better)