|
Size: 2022
Comment:
|
Size: 1752
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 7: | Line 7: |
| ||3||pop||9||a3||Population code|| | ||3||pop||9||a3||Population code (see [[https://wiki.interbull.org/public/Idea_population_codes?action=print|here]])|| |
| Line 21: | Line 21: |
| * population code is the same as country code with the following exceptions * DEA for joint DEU/AUS evaluations in BSW and SIM evaluations * DFS for joint DNK/FIN/SWE evaluations in all breeds * FRR for French Pied Rouge in HOL evaluations * FRM for French Montbeliard in HOL evaluations * CHR for Swiss Red Holsteins in HOL evaluations |
Format300 for Submission of National Evaluations to IDEA
Col |
Name |
Start |
Format |
Description |
1 |
rec |
1 |
a3 |
Record type (300) |
2 |
brd |
5 |
a3 |
Breed of evaluation (BSW/GUE/HOL/JER/RDC/SIM) |
3 |
pop |
9 |
a3 |
Population code (see here) |
4 |
trt |
13 |
a3 |
Trait code (see here) |
5 |
anim |
17 |
a19 |
Animal international ID |
6 |
type_prf |
37 |
i2 |
Type of proof |
7 |
off_pub |
40 |
a1 |
Official publication of proof (Y/P/N) |
8 |
status |
42 |
i2 |
Bull status |
9 |
ndau |
44 |
i8 |
Number of daughters |
10 |
nhrd |
52 |
i8 |
Number of herds |
11 |
edc |
60 |
i8 |
Effective daughter contributions |
12 |
rel |
68 |
f8.4 |
Repeatability/Reliability |
13 |
ebv |
76 |
f10.3 |
National predicted genetic merit |
Notes:
type of proof: 00 unknown; 11 based on first crop sampling daughters; 12 based on first and second crop daughters; 21 based on imported semen of proven bull (second crop daughters only).
status of bull: 00 unknown; 10 bull randomly sampled through an official AI scheme; 20 other bull. Records with "20" in this field will be excluded from the international evaluation, unless type of proof is "21".
- the rel field should be multiplied by 100 (eg. 95.6789)
- the ebv field may contain different numbers of decimals for different traits (eg. -1234.000 for milk yield, 111.100 fat, protein or functional traits, or 2.340 for type traits); the aim should be to have a minimum of two complete significant digits in the range of proofs, but more is even better)