Differences between revisions 10 and 11
Revision 10 as of 2015-06-25 08:15:42
Size: 22159
Editor: Valentina
Comment:
Revision 11 as of 2015-06-25 08:18:14
Size: 21301
Editor: Valentina
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 28: Line 28:
----
Line 29: Line 30:
||
||<
class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;"> ||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;">'''Session''' ||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;">'''Time''' ||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;">'''Author''' ||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;">'''Scientific report title''' ||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;">'''Other authors''' ||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;">'''Country''' ||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;">'''Organization''' ||
||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px; ;text-align:center" |20>'''Friday, July 10, 2015''' ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style=" ;text-align:center" |4>'''Developments in genomic evaluation methods (1) ''' Chair: ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="">08:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="">J.R. O’Connell ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Strategies to choose from millions of imputed sequence variants ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="">P.M. VanRaden ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="">USA ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="">University of Maryland School of Medicine ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="">08:50 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="">Birgit Gredler ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Intergenomics: Brown Swiss genotype data from 50K to sequence imputation ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="">C. Baes, B. Bapst, F. Seefried, H. Signer-Hasler, C. Flury, D. Garrick, C. Stricker, and the Intergenomics Consortium ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="">Switzerland ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="">Qualitas AG ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="">09:10 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="">Raphael Mrode ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Impact of the structure of the genomic matrix on accuracy of evaluations for imputed genotypes ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="">M. Coffey ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="">Great Britain ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="">EGENES, SRUC ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="">09:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="">Ignacy Misztal ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Efficient inversion of genomic relationship matrix by APY algorithm ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="">B.O. Fragomeni, D.A.L. Lourenco, S. Tsuruta, Y. Masuda, I. Aguilar, A. Legarra, and T. J. Lawlor ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="">USA ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="">University of Georgia ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style=" ;text-align:center" |4>'''Developments in genomic evaluation methods (2)''' Chair: ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="">10:30 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="">Y. Masuda ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Single-step evaluation in the US Holstein population with 570k genotyped animals ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="">I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, D. A. L. Lourenco, B. Fragomeni, A. Legarra, I. Aguilar, T. J. Lawlor ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="">USA ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="">University of Georgia ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="">10:50 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="">P. Croiseau ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">A new Marker-Assisted BLUP genomic evaluation for French dairy breeds ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="">A. Baur, D. Jonas, C. Hoze, J. Promp, D. Boichard, S. Fritz, V. Ducrocq ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="">France ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="">INRA ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="">11:10 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="">Daniela Lourenco ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Direct and indirect genomic evaluations in beef cattle ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="">I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, B. Fragomeni, I. Aguilar, Y. Masuda, D. Moser ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="">USA ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="">University of Georgia ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="">11:30 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="">Zengting Liu ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Joint Estimation of Additive and Dominance Effects of Markers Using a Genomic Model with a Residual Polygenic Effect ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="">H. Alkhoder, F. Reinhardt and R. Reents ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="">Germany ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="">VIT ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style=" ;text-align:center" |6>'''Developments in national genetic / genomic evaluation methods (1)''' Chair: ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">13:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">Paul VanRaden ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Genomic evaluations and breed composition for crossbred U.S. dairy cattle ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="">T. Cooper ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="">USA ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="">USDA-AGIL ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">13:50 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">Francesco Tiezzi ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Accounting for genotype by environment interaction in genomic predictions for US Holstein dairy cattle. ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="">KL Parker-Gaddis, JS Clay, C Maltecca ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="">USA ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="">North Carolina State University ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">14:10 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">Vincent Ducrocq ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Two approaches to account for G x E interactions for production traits in South African Holstein cattle ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="">Cadet A. , Patry C. , van Wyk J.B., Pienaar L. Neser F.W.C. ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="">France ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="">INRA ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">14:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">K. Muuttoranta ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Genetic parameters for female fertility in Nordic dairy cattle ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="">M. Lidauer, A-M. Tyrisevä, E.A. Mäntysaari, J. Pösö, J-Å. Eriksson, U.S. Nielsen, G.P. Aamand ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="">Finland ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="">Natural Resources Institute Finland ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">14:50 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">J. Vandenplas ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Innovative combination of all sources of information for production traits in Slovenian Brown Swiss ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="">M. Špehar, K. Potočnik, N. Gengler, G. Gorjanc ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="">Slovenia ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="">University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">15:10 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">K. V. Konstantinov ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Implementation of Multiple traits Multi Lactation Random Regression Test Day Model for Production Traits in Australia ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="">G. J. Nieuwhof and T. P. Hancock ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="">Australia ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="">ADHIS ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style=" ;text-align:center" |6>'''Developments in national genetic / genomic evaluation methods (2)''' Chair: ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">16:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">P.G. Sullivan ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">De-regressed MACE versus domestic EBV in Canadian national genomic evaluations ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="">J. Jamrozik, G.J. Kistemaker ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="">Canada ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="">CDN ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">16:20 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">G.R. Wiggans ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Revisiting the a posteriori granddaughter design ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="">J.I. Weller ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="">USA ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style=""> ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style=" ;
vertical-align:top">16:40 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">Daniel Abernethy ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">The development of new national breeding indices in Australia utilising direct farmer input ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="">Dr Jennie Pryce, Ms Michelle Axford, Dr Gert Nieuwhof ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="">Australia ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="">ADHIS ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">17:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">C. Jaton ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Genetic and genomic analysis of superovulatory response in Canadian Holsteins ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="">A.Koeck, M. Sargolzaei, C. A. Price, F. S. Schenkel, F. Miglior ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="">Canada ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="">CGIL, University of Guelph ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">17:20 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">W.M. Stoop ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Validation and implementation of new genomic traits in The Netherlands: lactose, urea, calf survival, ketosis, heifer fertility, and AMS traits. ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="">C. Schrooten, I. Vermeer, G. de Jong ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="">The Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="">CRV ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">17:40 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">Sandra Kipp ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ;vertical-align:top">A new Holstein Haploytpe affecting calf survival ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="">D. Segelke, S. Schierenbeck, F. Reinhardt, R Reents, C. Wurmser, H. Pausch, R. Fries, G. Thaller, J. Tetens, J. Pott, M. Piechotta, W. Grünberg ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="">Germany ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="">VIT ||
||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px; ;text-align:center" |9>'''Saturday, July 11, 2015''' ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style=" ;text-align:center" |4>'''Developments in national / international breeding objectives and structure''' Chair: ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">08:30 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">M.E. Tooker ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Comparison of Domestic and Foreign Genotypes by Country and Continent ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="">P.M. VanRaden, T. Cooper, and J. Dürr ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="">USA ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="">Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA ||
||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">08:50 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">Kakha Nadiradze ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">International Cooperation with GenesFlow (France) and Mapelhurst International (USA) ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="">N. Phirosmanashvili ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="">Georgia ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="">Association for Farmers Rights Defense, AFRD ||
||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">09:10 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">H. D. Norman ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Recent Changes in Service Sire Conception Rate in United States ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="">J.R. Wright, J. Dürr ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="">USA ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="">Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding ||
||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">09:30 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">B.J. Van Doormaal ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Pro$: A New Profit-Based Genetic Selection Index in Canada ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="">L. Beavers, G.J. Kistemaker, & P.G. Sullivan ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="">Canada ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="">CDN ||
||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style=" ;text-align:center" |5>'''New traits / models in national genetic evaluations''' Chair: ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">10:30 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">F. Malchiodi ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Genetic analyses of hoof lesions in Canadian Holsteins using an alternative contemporary group ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="">A. Koeck, N. Chapinal, M. Sargolzaei, A. Fleming, D. F. Kelton, F. S. Schenkel and F. Miglior ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="">Canada ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="">University of Guelph ||
||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">10:50 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">J.B.C.H.M. van Kaam ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Breeding value estimation for milk coagulation properties in the Italian Holstein Friesian bull population ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="">M. Battagin, R. Finocchiaro, D. Pretto, M. Penasa, M. De Marchi, M. Cassandro ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="">Italy ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="">ANAFI ||
||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">11:10 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">Hafedh Ben Zaabza ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Genetic parameters for reproduction traits in Tunisian Holstein cows ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="">A.Ben Gara, B.Rekik, H.Hammami, B. Jemmali, M.Ferchichi ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="">Tunisia ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="">School of Higher Education in Agriclture ||
||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">11:30 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">Astrid Koeck ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Development of genetic evaluations for metabolic disease traits for Canadian dairy cattle ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="">J. Jamrozik, G. J. Kistemaker, F. S. Schenkel, R. K. Moore, D. M. Lefebvre, D. F. Kelton, and F. Miglior ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="">Canada ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="">CGIL, University of Guelph ||
||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">11:50 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style=" ;vertical-align:top">B. Jemmali ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;">Monitoring of genes enhancer of mastitis resistance in Tunisian dairy cows ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="">A. Ben Gara, B. Rekik ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="">Tunisia ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="">School of Higher Education in Agriclture ||

||<tablewidth="1550px" tableheight="2177px"class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;"> ||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;">'''Session''' ||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;">'''Time''' ||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;">'''Author''' ||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;">'''Scientific report title''' ||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;">'''Other authors''' ||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;">'''Country''' ||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;">'''Organization''' ||
||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;     ;text-align:center" |20>'''Friday, July 10, 2015''' ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |4>'''Developments in genomic evaluation methods (1) ''' Chair: ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">08:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">J.R. O’Connell ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Strategies to choose from millions of imputed sequence variants ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">P.M. !VanRaden ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">USA ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">University of Maryland School of Medicine ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">08:50 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Birgit Gredler ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Intergenomics: Brown Swiss genotype data from 50K to sequence imputation ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">C. Baes, B. Bapst, F. Seefried, H. Signer-Hasler, C. Flury, D. Garrick, C. Stricker, and the Intergenomics Consortium ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Switzerland ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Qualitas AG ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:10 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Raphael Mrode ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Impact of the structure of the genomic matrix on accuracy of evaluations for imputed genotypes ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">M. Coffey ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Great Britain ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">EGENES, SRUC ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Ignacy Misztal ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Efficient inversion of genomic relationship matrix by APY algorithm ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">B.O. Fragomeni, D.A.L. Lourenco, S. Tsuruta, Y. Masuda, I. Aguilar, A. Legarra, and T. J. Lawlor ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">USA ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">University of Georgia ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |4>'''Developments in genomic evaluation methods (2)''' Chair: ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:30 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Y. Masuda ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Single-step evaluation in the US Holstein population with 570k genotyped animals ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, D. A. L. Lourenco, B. Fragomeni, A. Legarra, I. Aguilar, T. J. Lawlor ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">USA ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">University of Georgia ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:50 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">P. Croiseau ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">A new Marker-Assisted BLUP genomic evaluation for French dairy breeds ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">A. Baur, D. Jonas, C. Hoze, J. Promp, D. Boichard, S. Fritz, V. Ducrocq ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">France ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">INRA ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">11:10 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Daniela Lourenco ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Direct and indirect genomic evaluations in beef cattle ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, B. Fragomeni, I. Aguilar, Y. Masuda, D. Moser ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">USA ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">University of Georgia ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">11:30 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Zengting Liu ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Joint Estimation of Additive and Dominance Effects of Markers Using a Genomic Model with a Residual Polygenic Effect ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">H. Alkhoder, F. Reinhardt and R. Reents ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">VIT ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |6>'''Developments in national genetic / genomic evaluation methods (1)''' Chair: ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">13:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Paul VanRaden ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Genomic evaluations and breed composition for crossbred U.S. dairy cattle ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">T. Cooper ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USA ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USDA-AGIL ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">13:50 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Francesco Tiezzi ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Accounting for genotype by environment interaction in genomic predictions for US Holstein dairy cattle. ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">KL Parker-Gaddis, JS Clay, C Maltecca ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USA ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">North Carolina State University ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">14:10 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Vincent Ducrocq ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Two approaches to account for G x E interactions for production traits in South African Holstein cattle ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Cadet A. , Patry C. , van Wyk J.B., Pienaar L. Neser F.W.C. ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">France ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">INRA ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">14:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">K. Muuttoranta ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Genetic parameters for female fertility in Nordic dairy cattle ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">M. Lidauer, A-M. Tyrisevä, E.A. Mäntysaari, J. Pösö, J-Å. Eriksson, U.S. Nielsen, G.P. Aamand ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Finland ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Natural Resources Institute Finland ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">14:50 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">J. Vandenplas ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Innovative combination of all sources of information for production traits in Slovenian Brown Swiss ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">M. Špehar, K. Potočnik, N. Gengler, G. Gorjanc ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Slovenia ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">15:10 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">K. V. Konstantinov ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Implementation of Multiple traits Multi Lactation Random Regression Test Day Model for Production Traits in Australia ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">G. J. Nieuwhof and T. P. Hancock ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Australia ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">ADHIS ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |6>'''Developments in national genetic / genomic evaluation methods (2)''' Chair: ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">P.G. Sullivan ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">De-regressed MACE versus domestic EBV in Canadian national genomic evaluations ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">J. Jamrozik, G.J. Kistemaker ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CDN ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:20 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">G.R. Wiggans ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Revisiting the a posteriori granddaughter design ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">J.I. Weller ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">USA ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected"> ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:40 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Daniel Abernethy ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">The development of new national breeding indices in Australia utilising direct farmer input ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Dr Jennie Pryce, Ms Michelle Axford, Dr Gert Nieuwhof ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Australia ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">ADHIS ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">C. Jaton ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Genetic and genomic analysis of superovulatory response in Canadian Holsteins ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">A.Koeck, M. Sargolzaei, C. A. Price, F. S. Schenkel, F. Miglior ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CGIL, University of Guelph ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:20 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">W.M. Stoop ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Validation and implementation of new genomic traits in The Netherlands: lactose, urea, calf survival, ketosis, heifer fertility, and AMS traits. ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">C. Schrooten, I. Vermeer, G. de Jong ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">The Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CRV ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:40 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Sandra Kipp ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ;vertical-align:top">A new Holstein Haploytpe affecting calf survival ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">D. Segelke, S. Schierenbeck, F. Reinhardt, R Reents, C. Wurmser, H. Pausch, R. Fries, G. Thaller, J. Tetens, J. Pott, M. Piechotta, W. Grünberg ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">VIT ||
||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;     ;text-align:center" |9>'''Saturday, July 11, 2015''' ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |4>'''Developments in national / international breeding objectives and structure''' Chair: ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:30 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">M.E. Tooker ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Comparison of Domestic and Foreign Genotypes by Country and Continent ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">P.M. !VanRaden, T. Cooper, and J. Dürr ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">USA ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA ||
||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:50 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Kakha Nadiradze ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">International Cooperation with !GenesFlow (France) and Mapelhurst International (USA) ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">N. Phirosmanashvili ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Georgia ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Association for Farmers Rights Defense, AFRD ||
||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:10 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">H. D. Norman ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Recent Changes in Service Sire Conception Rate in United States ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">J.R. Wright, J. Dürr ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">USA ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding ||
||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:30 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">B.J. Van Doormaal ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Pro$: A New Profit-Based Genetic Selection Index in Canada ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">L. Beavers, G.J. Kistemaker, & P.G. Sullivan ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">CDN ||
||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |5>'''New traits / models in national genetic evaluations''' Chair: ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">10:30 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">F. Malchiodi ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Genetic analyses of hoof lesions in Canadian Holsteins using an alternative contemporary group ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">A. Koeck, N. Chapinal, M. Sargolzaei, A. Fleming, D. F. Kelton, F. S. Schenkel and F. Miglior ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">University of Guelph ||
||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">10:50 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">J.B.C.H.M. van Kaam ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Breeding value estimation for milk coagulation properties in the Italian Holstein Friesian bull population ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">M. Battagin, R. Finocchiaro, D. Pretto, M. Penasa, M. De Marchi, M. Cassandro ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Italy ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">ANAFI ||
||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">11:10 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Hafedh Ben Zaabza ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Genetic parameters for reproduction traits in Tunisian Holstein cows ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">A.Ben Gara, B.Rekik, H.Hammami, B. Jemmali, M.Ferchichi ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Tunisia ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">School of Higher Education in Agriclture ||
||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">11:30 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Astrid Koeck ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Development of genetic evaluations for metabolic disease traits for Canadian dairy cattle ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">J. Jamrozik, G. J. Kistemaker, F. S. Schenkel, R. K. Moore, D. M. Lefebvre, D. F. Kelton, and F. Miglior ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">CGIL, University of Guelph ||
||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">11:50 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">B. Jemmali ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;    ">Monitoring of genes enhancer of mastitis resistance in Tunisian dairy cows ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">A. Ben Gara, B. Rekik ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Tunisia ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">School of Higher Education in Agriclture ||

ITB_logo adsa_logo

2015 Interbull Meeting

Date: July 09-12, 2015 Venue: Rosen Shingle Creek Resort, Orlando, Florida

General Program - Interbull Activities

Day

Time

Interbull Annual Meeting

Thursday, July 09

8:00 am to 12:00 pm

Interbull Technical Committee

1:00 pm to 4:30 pm

Steering Committee

4:30 pm to 6:30 pm

Interbull Business Meeting

Friday, July 10

8:30 am to 10:00 am

Interbull Open Meeting — Session 1

10:30 am to 12:00 pm

Interbull Open Meeting — Session 2

1:30 pm to 3:30 pm

Interbull Open Meeting — Session 3

4:00 pm to 6:00 pm

Interbull Open Meeting — Session 4

8:00 pm to 11:00 pm

Interbull Dinner

Saturday, July 11

8:30 am to 10:00 am

Interbull Open Meeting — Session 5

10:30 am to 12:00 pm

Interbull Open Meeting — Session 6

1:00 pm to 3:00 pm

Interbull Business Meeting

3:00 pm to 4:30 pm

Interbull Technical Committee

4:30 pm to 7:00 pm

Steering Committee

Joint Interbull/JAM session

Sunday, July 12

8:30 am to 12:00 pm

Milk spectral data—Cost-effective information to improve expensive and limited traits in dairy cattle breeding

2:00 pm to 5:00 pm

Use of genomics to improve limited and novel phenotypes in animal breeding

Technical and Steering Committees are administrative meetings restricted to the respective members; business meetings are public and are dedicated to discuss operational and political decisions of the Steering Committee with participating organizations; open meetings are dedicated to scientific reports.


Scientific Program - Interbull Open Sessions

Session

Time

Author

Scientific report title

Other authors

Country

Organization

Friday, July 10, 2015

Developments in genomic evaluation methods (1) Chair:

08:30

J.R. O’Connell

Strategies to choose from millions of imputed sequence variants

P.M. VanRaden

USA

University of Maryland School of Medicine

08:50

Birgit Gredler

Intergenomics: Brown Swiss genotype data from 50K to sequence imputation

C. Baes, B. Bapst, F. Seefried, H. Signer-Hasler, C. Flury, D. Garrick, C. Stricker, and the Intergenomics Consortium

Switzerland

Qualitas AG

09:10

Raphael Mrode

Impact of the structure of the genomic matrix on accuracy of evaluations for imputed genotypes

M. Coffey

Great Britain

EGENES, SRUC

09:30

Ignacy Misztal

Efficient inversion of genomic relationship matrix by APY algorithm

B.O. Fragomeni, D.A.L. Lourenco, S. Tsuruta, Y. Masuda, I. Aguilar, A. Legarra, and T. J. Lawlor

USA

University of Georgia

Developments in genomic evaluation methods (2) Chair:

10:30

Y. Masuda

Single-step evaluation in the US Holstein population with 570k genotyped animals

I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, D. A. L. Lourenco, B. Fragomeni, A. Legarra, I. Aguilar, T. J. Lawlor

USA

University of Georgia

10:50

P. Croiseau

A new Marker-Assisted BLUP genomic evaluation for French dairy breeds

A. Baur, D. Jonas, C. Hoze, J. Promp, D. Boichard, S. Fritz, V. Ducrocq

France

INRA

11:10

Daniela Lourenco

Direct and indirect genomic evaluations in beef cattle

I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, B. Fragomeni, I. Aguilar, Y. Masuda, D. Moser

USA

University of Georgia

11:30

Zengting Liu

Joint Estimation of Additive and Dominance Effects of Markers Using a Genomic Model with a Residual Polygenic Effect

H. Alkhoder, F. Reinhardt and R. Reents

Germany

VIT

Developments in national genetic / genomic evaluation methods (1) Chair:

13:30

Paul VanRaden

Genomic evaluations and breed composition for crossbred U.S. dairy cattle

T. Cooper

USA

USDA-AGIL

13:50

Francesco Tiezzi

Accounting for genotype by environment interaction in genomic predictions for US Holstein dairy cattle.

KL Parker-Gaddis, JS Clay, C Maltecca

USA

North Carolina State University

14:10

Vincent Ducrocq

Two approaches to account for G x E interactions for production traits in South African Holstein cattle

Cadet A. , Patry C. , van Wyk J.B., Pienaar L. Neser F.W.C.

France

INRA

14:30

K. Muuttoranta

Genetic parameters for female fertility in Nordic dairy cattle

M. Lidauer, A-M. Tyrisevä, E.A. Mäntysaari, J. Pösö, J-Å. Eriksson, U.S. Nielsen, G.P. Aamand

Finland

Natural Resources Institute Finland

14:50

J. Vandenplas

Innovative combination of all sources of information for production traits in Slovenian Brown Swiss

M. Špehar, K. Potočnik, N. Gengler, G. Gorjanc

Slovenia

University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty

15:10

K. V. Konstantinov

Implementation of Multiple traits Multi Lactation Random Regression Test Day Model for Production Traits in Australia

G. J. Nieuwhof and T. P. Hancock

Australia

ADHIS

Developments in national genetic / genomic evaluation methods (2) Chair:

16:00

P.G. Sullivan

De-regressed MACE versus domestic EBV in Canadian national genomic evaluations

J. Jamrozik, G.J. Kistemaker

Canada

CDN

16:20

G.R. Wiggans

Revisiting the a posteriori granddaughter design

J.I. Weller

USA

16:40

Daniel Abernethy

The development of new national breeding indices in Australia utilising direct farmer input

Dr Jennie Pryce, Ms Michelle Axford, Dr Gert Nieuwhof

Australia

ADHIS

17:00

C. Jaton

Genetic and genomic analysis of superovulatory response in Canadian Holsteins

A.Koeck, M. Sargolzaei, C. A. Price, F. S. Schenkel, F. Miglior

Canada

CGIL, University of Guelph

17:20

W.M. Stoop

Validation and implementation of new genomic traits in The Netherlands: lactose, urea, calf survival, ketosis, heifer fertility, and AMS traits.

C. Schrooten, I. Vermeer, G. de Jong

The Netherlands

CRV

17:40

Sandra Kipp

A new Holstein Haploytpe affecting calf survival

D. Segelke, S. Schierenbeck, F. Reinhardt, R Reents, C. Wurmser, H. Pausch, R. Fries, G. Thaller, J. Tetens, J. Pott, M. Piechotta, W. Grünberg

Germany

VIT

Saturday, July 11, 2015

Developments in national / international breeding objectives and structure Chair:

08:30

M.E. Tooker

Comparison of Domestic and Foreign Genotypes by Country and Continent

P.M. VanRaden, T. Cooper, and J. Dürr

USA

Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA

08:50

Kakha Nadiradze

International Cooperation with GenesFlow (France) and Mapelhurst International (USA)

N. Phirosmanashvili

Georgia

Association for Farmers Rights Defense, AFRD

09:10

H. D. Norman

Recent Changes in Service Sire Conception Rate in United States

J.R. Wright, J. Dürr

USA

Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding

09:30

B.J. Van Doormaal

Pro$: A New Profit-Based Genetic Selection Index in Canada

L. Beavers, G.J. Kistemaker, & P.G. Sullivan

Canada

CDN

New traits / models in national genetic evaluations Chair:

10:30

F. Malchiodi

Genetic analyses of hoof lesions in Canadian Holsteins using an alternative contemporary group

A. Koeck, N. Chapinal, M. Sargolzaei, A. Fleming, D. F. Kelton, F. S. Schenkel and F. Miglior

Canada

University of Guelph

10:50

J.B.C.H.M. van Kaam

Breeding value estimation for milk coagulation properties in the Italian Holstein Friesian bull population

M. Battagin, R. Finocchiaro, D. Pretto, M. Penasa, M. De Marchi, M. Cassandro

Italy

ANAFI

11:10

Hafedh Ben Zaabza

Genetic parameters for reproduction traits in Tunisian Holstein cows

A.Ben Gara, B.Rekik, H.Hammami, B. Jemmali, M.Ferchichi

Tunisia

School of Higher Education in Agriclture

11:30

Astrid Koeck

Development of genetic evaluations for metabolic disease traits for Canadian dairy cattle

J. Jamrozik, G. J. Kistemaker, F. S. Schenkel, R. K. Moore, D. M. Lefebvre, D. F. Kelton, and F. Miglior

Canada

CGIL, University of Guelph

11:50

B. Jemmali

Monitoring of genes enhancer of mastitis resistance in Tunisian dairy cows

A. Ben Gara, B. Rekik

Tunisia

School of Higher Education in Agriclture

public/Orlando2015 (last edited 2015-07-24 11:37:09 by Valentina)