| 
  
   Size: 20914 
  
  Comment:  
 | 
  
   Size: 20448 
  
  Comment:  
 | 
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. | 
| Line 31: | Line 31: | 
| ||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;            ;text-align:center" |20>'''Friday, July 10, 2015''' ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |4>'''Developments in genomic evaluation methods (1) ''' <<BR>>Chair:Marija Klopcic ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">08:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">J.R. O’Connell ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;           ">Strategies to choose from millions of imputed sequence variants ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">P.M. !VanRaden ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">USA ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">University of Maryland School of Medicine || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">--(08:50 )-- ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Raphael Mrode ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Impact of the structure of the genomic matrix on accuracy of evaluations for imputed genotypes ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">M. Coffey ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Great Britain ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">EGENES, SRUC || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:10 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Ignacy Misztal ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Efficient inversion of genomic relationship matrix by APY algorithm ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">B.O. Fragomeni, D.A.L. Lourenco, S. Tsuruta, Y. Masuda, I. Aguilar, A. Legarra, and T. J. Lawlor ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">USA ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">University of Georgia || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Zengting Liu ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Joint Estimation of Additive and Dominance Effects of Markers Using a Genomic Model with a Residual Polygenic Effect ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Alkhoder, F. Reinhardt and R. Reents ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">VIT || ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |4>'''Developments in genomic evaluation methods (2)''' <<BR>>Chair:Gert Pedersen Aamand ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:30 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Y. Masuda ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Single-step evaluation in the US Holstein population with 570k genotyped animals ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, D. A. L. Lourenco, B. Fragomeni, A. Legarra, I. Aguilar, T. J. Lawlor ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">USA ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">University of Georgia || ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:50 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">P. Croiseau ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">A new Marker-Assisted BLUP genomic evaluation for French dairy breeds ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">A. Baur, D. Jonas, C. Hoze, J. Promp, D. Boichard, S. Fritz, V. Ducrocq ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">France ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">INRA || ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">11:10 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Daniela Lourenco ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Direct and indirect genomic evaluations in beef cattle ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, B. Fragomeni, I. Aguilar, Y. Masuda, D. Moser ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">USA ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">University of Georgia ||  | 
||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px;             ;text-align:center" |20>'''Friday, July 10, 2015''' ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |4>'''Developments in genomic evaluation methods (1) ''' <<BR>>Chair:Marija Klopcic ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">08:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">J.R. O’Connell ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;            ">Strategies to choose from millions of imputed sequence variants ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">P.M. !VanRaden ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">USA ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">University of Maryland School of Medicine || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">--(08:50 )-- ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Raphael Mrode ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Impact of the structure of the genomic matrix on accuracy of evaluations for imputed genotypes ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">M. Coffey ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Great Britain ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">EGENES, SRUC || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:10 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Ignacy Misztal ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Efficient inversion of genomic relationship matrix by APY algorithm ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">B.O. Fragomeni, D.A.L. Lourenco, S. Tsuruta, Y. Masuda, I. Aguilar, A. Legarra, and T. J. Lawlor ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">USA ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">University of Georgia || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Zengting Liu ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Joint Estimation of Additive and Dominance Effects of Markers Using a Genomic Model with a Residual Polygenic Effect ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Alkhoder, F. Reinhardt and R. Reents ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">VIT || ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |4>'''Developments in genomic evaluation methods (2)''' <<BR>>Chair:Gert Pedersen Aamand ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:30 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Y. Masuda ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Single-step evaluation in the US Holstein population with 570k genotyped animals ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, D. A. L. Lourenco, B. Fragomeni, A. Legarra, I. Aguilar, T. J. Lawlor ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">USA ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">University of Georgia || ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:50 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">P. Croiseau ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">A new Marker-Assisted BLUP genomic evaluation for French dairy breeds ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">A. Baur, D. Jonas, C. Hoze, J. Promp, D. Boichard, S. Fritz, V. Ducrocq ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">France ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">INRA || ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">11:10 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Daniela Lourenco ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Direct and indirect genomic evaluations in beef cattle ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, B. Fragomeni, I. Aguilar, Y. Masuda, D. Moser ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">USA ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">University of Georgia ||  | 
| Line 39: | Line 39: | 
| ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |6>'''Developments in national genetic / genomic evaluation methods (1)''' Chair:Enrico Santus ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">13:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Paul !VanRaden ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;           ">Genomic evaluations and breed composition for crossbred U.S. dairy cattle ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">T. Cooper ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USA ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USDA-AGIL || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">13:50 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Francesco Tiezzi ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Accounting for genotype by environment interaction in genomic predictions for US Holstein dairy cattle. ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">KL Parker-Gaddis, JS Clay, C Maltecca ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USA ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">North Carolina State University || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">14:10 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Vincent Ducrocq ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Two approaches to account for G x E interactions for production traits in South African Holstein cattle ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Cadet A. , Patry C. , van Wyk J.B., Pienaar L. Neser F.W.C. ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">France ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">INRA || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">14:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">J. Vandenplas ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Innovative combination of all sources of information for production traits in Slovenian Brown Swiss ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">M. Špehar, K. Potočnik, N. Gengler, G. Gorjanc ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Slovenia ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">14:50 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">K. V. Konstantinov ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Implementation of Multiple traits Multi Lactation Random Regression Test Day Model for Production Traits in Australia ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">G. J. Nieuwhof and T. P. Hancock ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Australia ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">ADHIS || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">15:10 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">K. Muuttoranta ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Genetic parameters for female fertility in Nordic dairy cattle ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">M. Lidauer, A-M. Tyrisevä, E.A. Mäntysaari, J. Pösö, J-Å. Eriksson, U.S. Nielsen, G.P. Aamand ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Finland ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Natural Resources Institute Finland || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |6>'''Developments in national genetic / genomic evaluation methods (2)''' Chair:Marjorie Faust ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">P.G. Sullivan ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">De-regressed MACE versus domestic EBV in Canadian national genomic evaluations ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">J. Jamrozik, G.J. Kistemaker ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CDN || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:20 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">G.R. Wiggans ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Revisiting the a posteriori granddaughter design ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">J.I. Weller ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">USA ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected"> || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:40 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">C. Jaton ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Genetic and genomic analysis of superovulatory response in Canadian Holsteins ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">A.Koeck, M. Sargolzaei, C. A. Price, F. S. Schenkel, F. Miglior ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CGIL, University of Guelph || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">W.M. Stoop ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Validation and implementation of new genomic traits in The Netherlands: lactose, urea, calf survival, ketosis, heifer fertility, and AMS traits. ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">C. Schrooten, I. Vermeer, G. de Jong ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">The Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CRV || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:40 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Sandra Kipp ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ;vertical-align:top">A new Holstein Haploytpe affecting calf survival ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">D. Segelke, S. Schierenbeck, F. Reinhardt, R Reents, C. Wurmser, H. Pausch, R. Fries, G. Thaller, J. Tetens, J. Pott, M. Piechotta, W. Grünberg ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">VIT || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:20||||||||||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">General discussion on "Developments in national genetic / genomic rvaluation methods"|| ||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px; ;text-align:center" |9>'''Saturday, July 11, 2015''' ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |4>'''Developments in national / international breeding objectives and structure''' Chair:Sophie Mattalia ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:30 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">M.E. Tooker ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Comparison of Domestic and Foreign Genotypes by Country and Continent ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">P.M. !VanRaden, T. Cooper, and J. Dürr ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">USA ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA || ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:50 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">H. D. Norman ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Recent Changes in Service Sire Conception Rate in United States ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">J.R. Wright, J. Dürr ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">USA ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding || ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:10 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">B.J. Van Doormaal ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Pro$: A New Profit-Based Genetic Selection Index in Canada ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">L. Beavers, G.J. Kistemaker, & P.G. Sullivan ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">CDN || ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:30||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Daniel Abernethy||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">The development of new national breeding indices in Australia utilising direct farmer input||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Dr Jennie Pryce, Ms Michelle Axford, Dr Gert Nieuwhof||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Australia||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">ADHIS|| ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |5>'''New traits / models in national genetic evaluations''' <<BR>>Chair:Andrew Cromie ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">10:30 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">F. Malchiodi ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Genetic analyses of hoof lesions in Canadian Holsteins using an alternative contemporary group ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">A. Koeck, N. Chapinal, M. Sargolzaei, A. Fleming, D. F. Kelton, F. S. Schenkel and F. Miglior ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">University of Guelph || ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">10:50 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">J.B.C.H.M. van Kaam ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Breeding value estimation for milk coagulation properties in the Italian Holstein Friesian bull population ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">M. Battagin, R. Finocchiaro, D. Pretto, M. Penasa, M. De Marchi, M. Cassandro ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Italy ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">ANAFI || ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">11:30 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Astrid Koeck ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Development of genetic evaluations for metabolic disease traits for Canadian dairy cattle ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">J. Jamrozik, G. J. Kistemaker, F. S. Schenkel, R. K. Moore, D. M. Lefebvre, D. F. Kelton, and F. Miglior ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">CGIL, University of Guelph || ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">11:30'' '' ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Sandra Kipp ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">A new Holstein Haploytpe affecting calf survival||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">D. Segelke, S. Schierenbeck, F. Reinhardt, R Reents, C. Wurmser, H. Pausch, R. Fries, G. Thaller, J. Tetens, J. Pott, M. Piechotta, W. Grünberg||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Germany||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">VIT|| ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">11:50||||||||||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">General discussuin on "national / international breeding objectives and structure, and new traits"||  | 
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |6>'''Developments in national genetic / genomic evaluation methods (1)''' Chair:Enrico Santus ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">13:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Paul !VanRaden ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;            ">Genomic evaluations and breed composition for crossbred U.S. dairy cattle ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">T. Cooper ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USA ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USDA-AGIL || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">13:50 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Francesco Tiezzi ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Accounting for genotype by environment interaction in genomic predictions for US Holstein dairy cattle. ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">KL Parker-Gaddis, JS Clay, C Maltecca ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USA ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">North Carolina State University || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">14:10 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Vincent Ducrocq ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Two approaches to account for G x E interactions for production traits in South African Holstein cattle ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Cadet A. , Patry C. , van Wyk J.B., Pienaar L. Neser F.W.C. ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">France ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">INRA || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">14:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">J. Vandenplas ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Innovative combination of all sources of information for production traits in Slovenian Brown Swiss ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">M. Špehar, K. Potočnik, N. Gengler, G. Gorjanc ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Slovenia ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">14:50 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">K. V. Konstantinov ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Implementation of Multiple traits Multi Lactation Random Regression Test Day Model for Production Traits in Australia ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">G. J. Nieuwhof and T. P. Hancock ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Australia ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">ADHIS || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">15:10 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">K. Muuttoranta ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Genetic parameters for female fertility in Nordic dairy cattle ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">M. Lidauer, A-M. Tyrisevä, E.A. Mäntysaari, J. Pösö, J-Å. Eriksson, U.S. Nielsen, G.P. Aamand ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Finland ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Natural Resources Institute Finland || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |6>'''Developments in national genetic / genomic evaluation methods (2)''' Chair:Marjorie Faust ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">P.G. Sullivan ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">De-regressed MACE versus domestic EBV in Canadian national genomic evaluations ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">J. Jamrozik, G.J. Kistemaker ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CDN || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:20 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">G.R. Wiggans ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Revisiting the a posteriori granddaughter design ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">J.I. Weller ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">USA ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected"> || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:40 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">C. Jaton ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Genetic and genomic analysis of superovulatory response in Canadian Holsteins ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">A.Koeck, M. Sargolzaei, C. A. Price, F. S. Schenkel, F. Miglior ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CGIL, University of Guelph || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">W.M. Stoop ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Validation and implementation of new genomic traits in The Netherlands: lactose, urea, calf survival, ketosis, heifer fertility, and AMS traits. ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">C. Schrooten, I. Vermeer, G. de Jong ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">The Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CRV || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top" |2>17:20||||||||||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top" |2>General Discussion "Developments in Nationa Genetic/Genomic Evaluation Methods"|| || ||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px; ;text-align:center" |9>'''Saturday, July 11, 2015''' ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |4>'''Developments in national / international breeding objectives and structure''' Chair:Sophie Mattalia ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:30 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">M.E. Tooker ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Comparison of Domestic and Foreign Genotypes by Country and Continent ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">P.M. !VanRaden, T. Cooper, and J. Dürr ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">USA ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA || ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:50 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">H. D. Norman ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Recent Changes in Service Sire Conception Rate in United States ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">J.R. Wright, J. Dürr ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">USA ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding || ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:10 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">B.J. Van Doormaal ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Pro$: A New Profit-Based Genetic Selection Index in Canada ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">L. Beavers, G.J. Kistemaker, & P.G. Sullivan ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">CDN || ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:30 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Daniel Abernethy ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">The development of new national breeding indices in Australia utilising direct farmer input ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Dr Jennie Pryce, Ms Michelle Axford, Dr Gert Nieuwhof ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Australia ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">ADHIS || ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |5>'''New traits / models in national genetic evaluations''' <<BR>>Chair:Andrew Cromie ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">10:30 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">F. Malchiodi ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Genetic analyses of hoof lesions in Canadian Holsteins using an alternative contemporary group ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">A. Koeck, N. Chapinal, M. Sargolzaei, A. Fleming, D. F. Kelton, F. S. Schenkel and F. Miglior ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">University of Guelph || ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">10:50 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">J.B.C.H.M. van Kaam ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Breeding value estimation for milk coagulation properties in the Italian Holstein Friesian bull population ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">M. Battagin, R. Finocchiaro, D. Pretto, M. Penasa, M. De Marchi, M. Cassandro ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Italy ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">ANAFI || ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">11:30 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Astrid Koeck ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Development of genetic evaluations for metabolic disease traits for Canadian dairy cattle ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">J. Jamrozik, G. J. Kistemaker, F. S. Schenkel, R. K. Moore, D. M. Lefebvre, D. F. Kelton, and F. Miglior ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">CGIL, University of Guelph || ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">11:30'' '' ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Sandra Kipp ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">A new Holstein Haploytpe affecting calf survival ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">D. Segelke, S. Schierenbeck, F. Reinhardt, R Reents, C. Wurmser, H. Pausch, R. Fries, G. Thaller, J. Tetens, J. Pott, M. Piechotta, W. Grünberg ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">VIT || ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">11:50 ||||||||||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top;text-align:center">General discussuin on "National / International breeding objectives and structure, and new traits" ||  | 
 
 
2015 Interbull Meeting
Date: July 09-12, 2015 Venue: Rosen Shingle Creek Resort, Orlando, Florida
General Program - Interbull Activities
Day  | 
  Time  | 
  
  | 
  | 
  
  | 
  Interbull Annual Meeting  | 
Thursday, July 09  | 
  8:00 am to 12:00 pm  | 
  Interbull Technical Committee  | 
  | 
  1:00 pm to 4:30 pm  | 
  Steering Committee  | 
  | 
  4:30 pm to 6:30 pm  | 
  Interbull Business Meeting  | 
Friday, July 10  | 
  8:30 am to 10:00 am  | 
  Interbull Open Meeting — Session 1  | 
  | 
  10:30 am to 12:00 pm  | 
  Interbull Open Meeting — Session 2  | 
  | 
  1:30 pm to 3:30 pm  | 
  Interbull Open Meeting — Session 3  | 
  | 
  4:00 pm to 6:00 pm  | 
  Interbull Open Meeting — Session 4  | 
  | 
  8:00 pm to 11:00 pm  | 
  Interbull Dinner  | 
Saturday, July 11  | 
  8:30 am to 10:00 am  | 
  Interbull Open Meeting — Session 5  | 
  | 
  10:30 am to 12:00 pm  | 
  Interbull Open Meeting — Session 6  | 
  | 
  1:00 pm to 3:00 pm  | 
  Interbull Business Meeting  | 
  | 
  3:00 pm to 4:30 pm  | 
  Interbull Technical Committee  | 
  | 
  4:30 pm to 7:00 pm  | 
  Steering Committee  | 
  | 
  
  | 
  Joint Interbull/JAM session  | 
Sunday, July 12  | 
  8:30 am to 12:00 pm  | 
  Milk spectral data—Cost-effective information to improve expensive and limited traits in dairy cattle breeding  | 
  | 
  2:00 pm to 5:00 pm  | 
  Use of genomics to improve limited and novel phenotypes in animal breeding  | 
Technical and Steering Committees are administrative meetings restricted to the respective members; business meetings are public and are dedicated to discuss operational and political decisions of the Steering Committee with participating organizations; open meetings are dedicated to scientific reports.  | 
||
Scientific Program - Interbull Open Sessions
  | 
  Session  | 
  Time  | 
  Author  | 
  Scientific report title  | 
  Other authors  | 
  Country  | 
  Organization  | 
Friday, July 10, 2015  | 
  Developments in genomic evaluation methods (1)    | 
  08:30  | 
  J.R. O’Connell  | 
  Strategies to choose from millions of imputed sequence variants  | 
  P.M. VanRaden  | 
  USA  | 
  University of Maryland School of Medicine  | 
08:50  | 
  Raphael Mrode  | 
  Impact of the structure of the genomic matrix on accuracy of evaluations for imputed genotypes  | 
  M. Coffey  | 
  Great Britain  | 
  EGENES, SRUC  | 
||
09:10  | 
  Ignacy Misztal  | 
  Efficient inversion of genomic relationship matrix by APY algorithm  | 
  B.O. Fragomeni, D.A.L. Lourenco, S. Tsuruta, Y. Masuda, I. Aguilar, A. Legarra, and T. J. Lawlor  | 
  USA  | 
  University of Georgia  | 
||
09:30  | 
  Zengting Liu  | 
  Joint Estimation of Additive and Dominance Effects of Markers Using a Genomic Model with a Residual Polygenic Effect  | 
  H. Alkhoder, F. Reinhardt and R. Reents  | 
  Germany  | 
  VIT  | 
||
Developments in genomic evaluation methods (2)   | 
  10:30  | 
  Y. Masuda  | 
  Single-step evaluation in the US Holstein population with 570k genotyped animals  | 
  I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, D. A. L. Lourenco, B. Fragomeni, A. Legarra, I. Aguilar, T. J. Lawlor  | 
  USA  | 
  University of Georgia  | 
|
10:50  | 
  P. Croiseau  | 
  A new Marker-Assisted BLUP genomic evaluation for French dairy breeds  | 
  A. Baur, D. Jonas, C. Hoze, J. Promp, D. Boichard, S. Fritz, V. Ducrocq  | 
  France  | 
  INRA  | 
||
11:10  | 
  Daniela Lourenco  | 
  Direct and indirect genomic evaluations in beef cattle  | 
  I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, B. Fragomeni, I. Aguilar, Y. Masuda, D. Moser  | 
  USA  | 
  University of Georgia  | 
||
11:30  | 
  General discussion on "Development of genomic evaluation methods"  | 
||||||
Developments in national genetic / genomic evaluation methods (1) Chair:Enrico Santus  | 
  13:30  | 
  Paul VanRaden  | 
  Genomic evaluations and breed composition for crossbred U.S. dairy cattle  | 
  T. Cooper  | 
  USA  | 
  USDA-AGIL  | 
|
13:50  | 
  Francesco Tiezzi  | 
  Accounting for genotype by environment interaction in genomic predictions for US Holstein dairy cattle.  | 
  KL Parker-Gaddis, JS Clay, C Maltecca  | 
  USA  | 
  North Carolina State University  | 
||
14:10  | 
  Vincent Ducrocq  | 
  Two approaches to account for G x E interactions for production traits in South African Holstein cattle  | 
  Cadet A. , Patry C. , van Wyk J.B., Pienaar L. Neser F.W.C.  | 
  France  | 
  INRA  | 
||
14:30  | 
  J. Vandenplas  | 
  Innovative combination of all sources of information for production traits in Slovenian Brown Swiss  | 
  M. Špehar, K. Potočnik, N. Gengler, G. Gorjanc  | 
  Slovenia  | 
  University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty  | 
||
14:50  | 
  K. V. Konstantinov  | 
  Implementation of Multiple traits Multi Lactation Random Regression Test Day Model for Production Traits in Australia  | 
  G. J. Nieuwhof and T. P. Hancock  | 
  Australia  | 
  ADHIS  | 
||
15:10  | 
  K. Muuttoranta  | 
  Genetic parameters for female fertility in Nordic dairy cattle  | 
  M. Lidauer, A-M. Tyrisevä, E.A. Mäntysaari, J. Pösö, J-Å. Eriksson, U.S. Nielsen, G.P. Aamand  | 
  Finland  | 
  Natural Resources Institute Finland  | 
||
Developments in national genetic / genomic evaluation methods (2) Chair:Marjorie Faust  | 
  16:00  | 
  P.G. Sullivan  | 
  De-regressed MACE versus domestic EBV in Canadian national genomic evaluations  | 
  J. Jamrozik, G.J. Kistemaker  | 
  Canada  | 
  CDN  | 
|
16:20  | 
  G.R. Wiggans  | 
  Revisiting the a posteriori granddaughter design  | 
  J.I. Weller  | 
  USA  | 
  
  | 
||
16:40  | 
  C. Jaton  | 
  Genetic and genomic analysis of superovulatory response in Canadian Holsteins  | 
  A.Koeck, M. Sargolzaei, C. A. Price, F. S. Schenkel, F. Miglior  | 
  Canada  | 
  CGIL, University of Guelph  | 
||
17:00  | 
  W.M. Stoop  | 
  Validation and implementation of new genomic traits in The Netherlands: lactose, urea, calf survival, ketosis, heifer fertility, and AMS traits.  | 
  C. Schrooten, I. Vermeer, G. de Jong  | 
  The Netherlands  | 
  CRV  | 
||
17:20  | 
  General Discussion "Developments in Nationa Genetic/Genomic Evaluation Methods"  | 
||||||
||
Saturday, July 11, 2015  | 
  Developments in national / international breeding objectives and structure Chair:Sophie Mattalia  | 
  08:30  | 
  M.E. Tooker  | 
  Comparison of Domestic and Foreign Genotypes by Country and Continent  | 
  P.M. VanRaden, T. Cooper, and J. Dürr  | 
  USA  | 
  Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA  | 
08:50  | 
  H. D. Norman  | 
  Recent Changes in Service Sire Conception Rate in United States  | 
  J.R. Wright, J. Dürr  | 
  USA  | 
  Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding  | 
||
09:10  | 
  B.J. Van Doormaal  | 
  Pro$: A New Profit-Based Genetic Selection Index in Canada  | 
  L. Beavers, G.J. Kistemaker, & P.G. Sullivan  | 
  Canada  | 
  CDN  | 
||
09:30  | 
  Daniel Abernethy  | 
  The development of new national breeding indices in Australia utilising direct farmer input  | 
  Dr Jennie Pryce, Ms Michelle Axford, Dr Gert Nieuwhof  | 
  Australia  | 
  ADHIS  | 
||
New traits / models in national genetic evaluations   | 
  10:30  | 
  F. Malchiodi  | 
  Genetic analyses of hoof lesions in Canadian Holsteins using an alternative contemporary group  | 
  A. Koeck, N. Chapinal, M. Sargolzaei, A. Fleming, D. F. Kelton, F. S. Schenkel and F. Miglior  | 
  Canada  | 
  University of Guelph  | 
|
10:50  | 
  J.B.C.H.M. van Kaam  | 
  Breeding value estimation for milk coagulation properties in the Italian Holstein Friesian bull population  | 
  M. Battagin, R. Finocchiaro, D. Pretto, M. Penasa, M. De Marchi, M. Cassandro  | 
  Italy  | 
  ANAFI  | 
||
11:30  | 
  Astrid Koeck  | 
  Development of genetic evaluations for metabolic disease traits for Canadian dairy cattle  | 
  J. Jamrozik, G. J. Kistemaker, F. S. Schenkel, R. K. Moore, D. M. Lefebvre, D. F. Kelton, and F. Miglior  | 
  Canada  | 
  CGIL, University of Guelph  | 
||
11:30  | 
  Sandra Kipp  | 
  A new Holstein Haploytpe affecting calf survival  | 
  D. Segelke, S. Schierenbeck, F. Reinhardt, R Reents, C. Wurmser, H. Pausch, R. Fries, G. Thaller, J. Tetens, J. Pott, M. Piechotta, W. Grünberg  | 
  Germany  | 
  VIT  | 
||
11:50  | 
  General discussuin on "National / International breeding objectives and structure, and new traits"  | 
||||||
