Size: 20967
Comment:
|
Size: 21476
Comment:
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 31: | Line 31: |
Line 33: | Line 32: |
||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px; ;text-align:center" |20>'''Friday, July 10, 2015''' ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |4>'''Developments in genomic evaluation methods (1) ''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:'''''Marija Klopcic ''''' ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">08:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">J.R. O’Connell ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Strategies to choose from millions of imputed sequence variants ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">P.M. !VanRaden ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">USA ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">University of Maryland School of Medicine || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">08:50 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Raphael Mrode ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Impact of the structure of the genomic matrix on accuracy of evaluations for imputed genotypes ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">M. Coffey ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Great Britain ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">EGENES, SRUC || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:10 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Ignacy Misztal ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Efficient inversion of genomic relationship matrix by APY algorithm ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">B.O. Fragomeni, D.A.L. Lourenco, S. Tsuruta, Y. Masuda, I. Aguilar, A. Legarra, and T. J. Lawlor ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">USA ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">University of Georgia || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Zengting Liu ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Joint Estimation of Additive and Dominance Effects of Markers Using a Genomic Model with a Residual Polygenic Effect ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Alkhoder, F. Reinhardt and R. Reents ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">VIT || ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |4>'''Developments in genomic evaluation methods (2)''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:'''''Gert Pedersen Aamand''''' ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:30 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Y. Masuda ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Single-step evaluation in the US Holstein population with 570k genotyped animals ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, D. A. L. Lourenco, B. Fragomeni, A. Legarra, I. Aguilar, T. J. Lawlor ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">USA ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">University of Georgia || ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:50 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">P. Croiseau ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">A new Marker-Assisted BLUP genomic evaluation for French dairy breeds ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">A. Baur, D. Jonas, C. Hoze, J. Promp, D. Boichard, S. Fritz, V. Ducrocq ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">France ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">INRA || ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">11:10 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Daniela Lourenco ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Direct and indirect genomic evaluations in beef cattle ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, B. Fragomeni, I. Aguilar, Y. Masuda, D. Moser ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">USA ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">University of Georgia || |
||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px; ;text-align:center" |20>'''Friday, July 10, 2015''' ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |4>'''Developments in genomic evaluation methods (1) ''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:'''''Marija Klopcic ''''' ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">08:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">J.R. O’Connell ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Strategies to choose from millions of imputed sequence variants ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">P.M. !VanRaden ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">USA ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">University of Maryland School of Medicine || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">08:50 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Raphael Mrode ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Impact of the structure of the genomic matrix on accuracy of evaluations for imputed genotypes ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">M. Coffey ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Great Britain ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">EGENES, SRUC || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:10 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Ignacy Misztal ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Efficient inversion of genomic relationship matrix by APY algorithm ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">B.O. Fragomeni, D.A.L. Lourenco, S. Tsuruta, Y. Masuda, I. Aguilar, A. Legarra, and T. J. Lawlor ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">USA ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">University of Georgia || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Zengting Liu ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Joint Estimation of Additive and Dominance Effects of Markers Using a Genomic Model with a Residual Polygenic Effect ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Alkhoder, F. Reinhardt and R. Reents ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">VIT || ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |4>'''Developments in genomic evaluation methods (2)''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:'''''Gert Pedersen Aamand''''' ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:30 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Y. Masuda ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Single-step evaluation in the US Holstein population with 570k genotyped animals ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, D. A. L. Lourenco, B. Fragomeni, A. Legarra, I. Aguilar, T. J. Lawlor ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">USA ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">University of Georgia || ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:50 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">P. Croiseau ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">A new Marker-Assisted BLUP genomic evaluation for French dairy breeds ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">A. Baur, D. Jonas, C. Hoze, J. Promp, D. Boichard, S. Fritz, V. Ducrocq ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">France ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">INRA || ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">11:10 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Daniela Lourenco ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Direct and indirect genomic evaluations in beef cattle ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, B. Fragomeni, I. Aguilar, Y. Masuda, D. Moser ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">USA ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">University of Georgia || |
Line 41: | Line 40: |
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |6>'''Developments in national genetic / genomic evaluation methods (1)''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:'''''Enrico Santus ''''' ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">13:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Paul !VanRaden ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Genomic evaluations and breed composition for crossbred U.S. dairy cattle ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">T. Cooper ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USA ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USDA-AGIL || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">13:50 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Francesco Tiezzi ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Accounting for genotype by environment interaction in genomic predictions for US Holstein dairy cattle. ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">KL Parker-Gaddis, JS Clay, C Maltecca ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USA ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">North Carolina State University || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">14:10 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Vincent Ducrocq ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Two approaches to account for G x E interactions for production traits in South African Holstein cattle ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Cadet A. , Patry C. , van Wyk J.B., Pienaar L. Neser F.W.C. ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">France ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">INRA || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">14:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">J. Vandenplas ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Innovative combination of all sources of information for production traits in Slovenian Brown Swiss ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">M. Špehar, K. Potočnik, N. Gengler, G. Gorjanc ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Slovenia ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">14:50 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">K. V. Konstantinov ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Implementation of Multiple traits Multi Lactation Random Regression Test Day Model for Production Traits in Australia ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">G. J. Nieuwhof and T. P. Hancock ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Australia ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">ADHIS || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">15:10 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">K. Muuttoranta ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Genetic parameters for female fertility in Nordic dairy cattle ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">M. Lidauer, A-M. Tyrisevä, E.A. Mäntysaari, J. Pösö, J-Å. Eriksson, U.S. Nielsen, G.P. Aamand ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Finland ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Natural Resources Institute Finland || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |6>'''Developments in national genetic / genomic evaluation methods (2)''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:'''''Marjorie Faust ''''' ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">P.G. Sullivan ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">De-regressed MACE versus domestic EBV in Canadian national genomic evaluations ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">J. Jamrozik, G.J. Kistemaker ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CDN || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:20 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">G.R. Wiggans ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Revisiting the a posteriori granddaughter design ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">J.I. Weller ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">USA ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected"> || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:40 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">C. Jaton ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Genetic and genomic analysis of superovulatory response in Canadian Holsteins ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">A.Koeck, M. Sargolzaei, C. A. Price, F. S. Schenkel, F. Miglior ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CGIL, University of Guelph || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">W.M. Stoop ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Validation and implementation of new genomic traits in The Netherlands: lactose, urea, calf survival, ketosis, heifer fertility, and AMS traits. ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">C. Schrooten, I. Vermeer, G. de Jong ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">The Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CRV || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top;text-align:center" |2>17:20 ||||||||||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top;text-align:center" |2>General Discussion "Developments in Nationa Genetic/Genomic Evaluation Methods" || |
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |6>'''Developments in national genetic / genomic evaluation methods (1)''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:'''''Enrico Santus ''''' ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">13:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Paul !VanRaden ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Genomic evaluations and breed composition for crossbred U.S. dairy cattle ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">T. Cooper ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USA ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USDA-AGIL || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">13:50 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Francesco Tiezzi ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Accounting for genotype by environment interaction in genomic predictions for US Holstein dairy cattle. ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">KL Parker-Gaddis, JS Clay, C Maltecca ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USA ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">North Carolina State University || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">14:10 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Vincent Ducrocq ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Two approaches to account for G x E interactions for production traits in South African Holstein cattle ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Cadet A. , Patry C. , van Wyk J.B., Pienaar L. Neser F.W.C. ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">France ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">INRA || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">14:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">J. Vandenplas ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Innovative combination of all sources of information for production traits in Slovenian Brown Swiss ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">M. Špehar, K. Potočnik, N. Gengler, G. Gorjanc ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Slovenia ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">14:50 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">K. V. Konstantinov ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Implementation of Multiple traits Multi Lactation Random Regression Test Day Model for Production Traits in Australia ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">G. J. Nieuwhof and T. P. Hancock ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Australia ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">ADHIS || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">15:10 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">K. Muuttoranta ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Genetic parameters for female fertility in Nordic dairy cattle ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">M. Lidauer, A-M. Tyrisevä, E.A. Mäntysaari, J. Pösö, J-Å. Eriksson, U.S. Nielsen, G.P. Aamand ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Finland ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Natural Resources Institute Finland || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |6>'''Developments in national genetic / genomic evaluation methods (2)''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:'''''Marjorie Faust ''''' ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">P.G. Sullivan ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">De-regressed MACE versus domestic EBV in Canadian national genomic evaluations ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">J. Jamrozik, G.J. Kistemaker ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CDN || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:20 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">G.R. Wiggans ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Revisiting the a posteriori granddaughter design ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">J.I. Weller ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">USA ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected"> || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:40 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">C. Jaton ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Genetic and genomic analysis of superovulatory response in Canadian Holsteins ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">A.Koeck, M. Sargolzaei, C. A. Price, F. S. Schenkel, F. Miglior ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CGIL, University of Guelph || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">W.M. Stoop ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Validation and implementation of new genomic traits in The Netherlands: lactose, urea, calf survival, ketosis, heifer fertility, and AMS traits. ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">C. Schrooten, I. Vermeer, G. de Jong ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">The Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CRV || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:20 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Gerben !DeJong ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Genetic evaluation for ketosis in the Netherlands based on FTIR measurements ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Jorien Vosman, Herwin Eding, Hiemke Knijn ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">The Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CRV || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top;text-align:center" |2>17:40 ||||||||||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top;text-align:center" |2>General Discussion "Developments in Nationa Genetic/Genomic Evaluation Methods" || |
Line 54: | Line 54: |
||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px; ;text-align:center" |9>'''Saturday, July 11, 2015''' ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |4>'''Developments in national / international breeding objectives and structure''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:'''''Sophie Mattalia ''''' ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:30 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">M.E. Tooker ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Comparison of Domestic and Foreign Genotypes by Country and Continent ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">P.M. !VanRaden, T. Cooper, and J. Dürr ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">USA ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA || ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:50 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">H. D. Norman ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Recent Changes in Service Sire Conception Rate in United States ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">J.R. Wright, J. Dürr ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">USA ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding || ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:10 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">B.J. Van Doormaal ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Pro$: A New Profit-Based Genetic Selection Index in Canada ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">L. Beavers, G.J. Kistemaker, & P.G. Sullivan ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">CDN || ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:30 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Daniel Abernethy ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">The development of new national breeding indices in Australia utilising direct farmer input ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Dr Jennie Pryce, Ms Michelle Axford, Dr Gert Nieuwhof ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Australia ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">ADHIS || ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |5>'''New traits / models in national genetic evaluations''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:'''''Andrew Cromie''''' ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">10:30 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">F. Malchiodi ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Genetic analyses of hoof lesions in Canadian Holsteins using an alternative contemporary group ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">A. Koeck, N. Chapinal, M. Sargolzaei, A. Fleming, D. F. Kelton, F. S. Schenkel and F. Miglior ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">University of Guelph || ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">10:50 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">J.B.C.H.M. van Kaam ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Breeding value estimation for milk coagulation properties in the Italian Holstein Friesian bull population ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">M. Battagin, R. Finocchiaro, D. Pretto, M. Penasa, M. De Marchi, M. Cassandro ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Italy ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">ANAFI || ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">11:30 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Astrid Koeck ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Development of genetic evaluations for metabolic disease traits for Canadian dairy cattle ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">J. Jamrozik, G. J. Kistemaker, F. S. Schenkel, R. K. Moore, D. M. Lefebvre, D. F. Kelton, and F. Miglior ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">CGIL, University of Guelph || ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">11:30'' '' ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Sandra Kipp ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">A new Holstein Haploytpe affecting calf survival ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">D. Segelke, S. Schierenbeck, F. Reinhardt, R Reents, C. Wurmser, H. Pausch, R. Fries, G. Thaller, J. Tetens, J. Pott, M. Piechotta, W. Grünberg ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">VIT || |
||<class="mceSelected" style="border-color:#000000;border-style:solid;border-width:1px; ;text-align:center" |9>'''Saturday, July 11, 2015''' ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |4>'''Developments in national / international breeding objectives and structure''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:'''''Sophie Mattalia ''''' ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:30 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">M.E. Tooker ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Comparison of Domestic and Foreign Genotypes by Country and Continent ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">P.M. !VanRaden, T. Cooper, and J. Dürr ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">USA ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA || ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:50 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">H. D. Norman ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Recent Changes in Service Sire Conception Rate in United States ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">J.R. Wright, J. Dürr ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">USA ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding || ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:10 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">B.J. Van Doormaal ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Pro$: A New Profit-Based Genetic Selection Index in Canada ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">L. Beavers, G.J. Kistemaker, & P.G. Sullivan ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">CDN || ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:30 ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Daniel Abernethy ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">The development of new national breeding indices in Australia utilising direct farmer input ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Dr Jennie Pryce, Ms Michelle Axford, Dr Gert Nieuwhof ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">Australia ||<#cc99cc class="mceSelected">ADHIS || ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |5>'''New traits / models in national genetic evaluations''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:'''''Andrew Cromie''''' ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">10:30 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">F. Malchiodi ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Genetic analyses of hoof lesions in Canadian Holsteins using an alternative contemporary group ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">A. Koeck, N. Chapinal, M. Sargolzaei, A. Fleming, D. F. Kelton, F. S. Schenkel and F. Miglior ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">University of Guelph || ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">10:50 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">J.B.C.H.M. van Kaam ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Breeding value estimation for milk coagulation properties in the Italian Holstein Friesian bull population ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">M. Battagin, R. Finocchiaro, D. Pretto, M. Penasa, M. De Marchi, M. Cassandro ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Italy ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">ANAFI || ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">11:30 ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Astrid Koeck ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Development of genetic evaluations for metabolic disease traits for Canadian dairy cattle ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">J. Jamrozik, G. J. Kistemaker, F. S. Schenkel, R. K. Moore, D. M. Lefebvre, D. F. Kelton, and F. Miglior ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Canada ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">CGIL, University of Guelph || ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">11:30'' '' ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Sandra Kipp ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">A new Holstein Haploytpe affecting calf survival ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">D. Segelke, S. Schierenbeck, F. Reinhardt, R Reents, C. Wurmser, H. Pausch, R. Fries, G. Thaller, J. Tetens, J. Pott, M. Piechotta, W. Grünberg ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#f0e68c class="mceSelected">VIT || |
Line 63: | Line 63: |
2015 Interbull Meeting
Date: July 09-12, 2015 Venue: Rosen Shingle Creek Resort, Orlando, Florida
General Program - Interbull Activities
Day |
Time |
|
|
|
Interbull Annual Meeting |
Thursday, July 09 |
8:00 am to 12:00 pm |
Interbull Technical Committee |
|
1:00 pm to 4:30 pm |
Steering Committee |
|
4:30 pm to 6:30 pm |
Interbull Business Meeting |
Friday, July 10 |
8:30 am to 10:00 am |
Interbull Open Meeting — Session 1 |
|
10:30 am to 12:00 pm |
Interbull Open Meeting — Session 2 |
|
1:30 pm to 3:30 pm |
Interbull Open Meeting — Session 3 |
|
4:00 pm to 6:00 pm |
Interbull Open Meeting — Session 4 |
|
8:00 pm to 11:00 pm |
Interbull Dinner |
Saturday, July 11 |
8:30 am to 10:00 am |
Interbull Open Meeting — Session 5 |
|
10:30 am to 12:00 pm |
Interbull Open Meeting — Session 6 |
|
1:00 pm to 3:00 pm |
Interbull Business Meeting |
|
3:00 pm to 4:30 pm |
Interbull Technical Committee |
|
4:30 pm to 7:00 pm |
Steering Committee |
|
|
Joint Interbull/JAM session |
Sunday, July 12 |
8:30 am to 12:00 pm |
Milk spectral data—Cost-effective information to improve expensive and limited traits in dairy cattle breeding |
|
2:00 pm to 5:00 pm |
Use of genomics to improve limited and novel phenotypes in animal breeding |
Technical and Steering Committees are administrative meetings restricted to the respective members; business meetings are public and are dedicated to discuss operational and political decisions of the Steering Committee with participating organizations; open meetings are dedicated to scientific reports. |
Scientific Program - Interbull Open Sessions
Download the scientific program as pdf
|
Session |
Time |
Author |
Scientific report title |
Other authors |
Country |
Organization |
Friday, July 10, 2015 |
Developments in genomic evaluation methods (1) |
08:30 |
J.R. O’Connell |
Strategies to choose from millions of imputed sequence variants |
P.M. VanRaden |
USA |
University of Maryland School of Medicine |
08:50 |
Raphael Mrode |
Impact of the structure of the genomic matrix on accuracy of evaluations for imputed genotypes |
M. Coffey |
Great Britain |
EGENES, SRUC |
||
09:10 |
Ignacy Misztal |
Efficient inversion of genomic relationship matrix by APY algorithm |
B.O. Fragomeni, D.A.L. Lourenco, S. Tsuruta, Y. Masuda, I. Aguilar, A. Legarra, and T. J. Lawlor |
USA |
University of Georgia |
||
09:30 |
Zengting Liu |
Joint Estimation of Additive and Dominance Effects of Markers Using a Genomic Model with a Residual Polygenic Effect |
H. Alkhoder, F. Reinhardt and R. Reents |
Germany |
VIT |
||
Developments in genomic evaluation methods (2) |
10:30 |
Y. Masuda |
Single-step evaluation in the US Holstein population with 570k genotyped animals |
I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, D. A. L. Lourenco, B. Fragomeni, A. Legarra, I. Aguilar, T. J. Lawlor |
USA |
University of Georgia |
|
10:50 |
P. Croiseau |
A new Marker-Assisted BLUP genomic evaluation for French dairy breeds |
A. Baur, D. Jonas, C. Hoze, J. Promp, D. Boichard, S. Fritz, V. Ducrocq |
France |
INRA |
||
11:10 |
Daniela Lourenco |
Direct and indirect genomic evaluations in beef cattle |
I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, B. Fragomeni, I. Aguilar, Y. Masuda, D. Moser |
USA |
University of Georgia |
||
11:30 |
General discussion on "Development of genomic evaluation methods" |
||||||
Developments in national genetic / genomic evaluation methods (1) |
13:30 |
Paul VanRaden |
Genomic evaluations and breed composition for crossbred U.S. dairy cattle |
T. Cooper |
USA |
USDA-AGIL |
|
13:50 |
Francesco Tiezzi |
Accounting for genotype by environment interaction in genomic predictions for US Holstein dairy cattle. |
KL Parker-Gaddis, JS Clay, C Maltecca |
USA |
North Carolina State University |
||
14:10 |
Vincent Ducrocq |
Two approaches to account for G x E interactions for production traits in South African Holstein cattle |
Cadet A. , Patry C. , van Wyk J.B., Pienaar L. Neser F.W.C. |
France |
INRA |
||
14:30 |
J. Vandenplas |
Innovative combination of all sources of information for production traits in Slovenian Brown Swiss |
M. Špehar, K. Potočnik, N. Gengler, G. Gorjanc |
Slovenia |
University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty |
||
14:50 |
K. V. Konstantinov |
Implementation of Multiple traits Multi Lactation Random Regression Test Day Model for Production Traits in Australia |
G. J. Nieuwhof and T. P. Hancock |
Australia |
ADHIS |
||
15:10 |
K. Muuttoranta |
Genetic parameters for female fertility in Nordic dairy cattle |
M. Lidauer, A-M. Tyrisevä, E.A. Mäntysaari, J. Pösö, J-Å. Eriksson, U.S. Nielsen, G.P. Aamand |
Finland |
Natural Resources Institute Finland |
||
Developments in national genetic / genomic evaluation methods (2) |
16:00 |
P.G. Sullivan |
De-regressed MACE versus domestic EBV in Canadian national genomic evaluations |
J. Jamrozik, G.J. Kistemaker |
Canada |
CDN |
|
16:20 |
G.R. Wiggans |
Revisiting the a posteriori granddaughter design |
J.I. Weller |
USA |
|
||
16:40 |
C. Jaton |
Genetic and genomic analysis of superovulatory response in Canadian Holsteins |
A.Koeck, M. Sargolzaei, C. A. Price, F. S. Schenkel, F. Miglior |
Canada |
CGIL, University of Guelph |
||
17:00 |
W.M. Stoop |
Validation and implementation of new genomic traits in The Netherlands: lactose, urea, calf survival, ketosis, heifer fertility, and AMS traits. |
C. Schrooten, I. Vermeer, G. de Jong |
The Netherlands |
CRV |
||
17:20 |
Gerben DeJong |
Genetic evaluation for ketosis in the Netherlands based on FTIR measurements |
Jorien Vosman, Herwin Eding, Hiemke Knijn |
The Netherlands |
CRV |
||
17:40 |
General Discussion "Developments in Nationa Genetic/Genomic Evaluation Methods" |
Saturday, July 11, 2015 |
Developments in national / international breeding objectives and structure |
08:30 |
M.E. Tooker |
Comparison of Domestic and Foreign Genotypes by Country and Continent |
P.M. VanRaden, T. Cooper, and J. Dürr |
USA |
Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA |
08:50 |
H. D. Norman |
Recent Changes in Service Sire Conception Rate in United States |
J.R. Wright, J. Dürr |
USA |
Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding |
||
09:10 |
B.J. Van Doormaal |
Pro$: A New Profit-Based Genetic Selection Index in Canada |
L. Beavers, G.J. Kistemaker, & P.G. Sullivan |
Canada |
CDN |
||
09:30 |
Daniel Abernethy |
The development of new national breeding indices in Australia utilising direct farmer input |
Dr Jennie Pryce, Ms Michelle Axford, Dr Gert Nieuwhof |
Australia |
ADHIS |
||
New traits / models in national genetic evaluations |
10:30 |
F. Malchiodi |
Genetic analyses of hoof lesions in Canadian Holsteins using an alternative contemporary group |
A. Koeck, N. Chapinal, M. Sargolzaei, A. Fleming, D. F. Kelton, F. S. Schenkel and F. Miglior |
Canada |
University of Guelph |
|
10:50 |
J.B.C.H.M. van Kaam |
Breeding value estimation for milk coagulation properties in the Italian Holstein Friesian bull population |
M. Battagin, R. Finocchiaro, D. Pretto, M. Penasa, M. De Marchi, M. Cassandro |
Italy |
ANAFI |
||
11:30 |
Astrid Koeck |
Development of genetic evaluations for metabolic disease traits for Canadian dairy cattle |
J. Jamrozik, G. J. Kistemaker, F. S. Schenkel, R. K. Moore, D. M. Lefebvre, D. F. Kelton, and F. Miglior |
Canada |
CGIL, University of Guelph |
||
11:30 |
Sandra Kipp |
A new Holstein Haploytpe affecting calf survival |
D. Segelke, S. Schierenbeck, F. Reinhardt, R Reents, C. Wurmser, H. Pausch, R. Fries, G. Thaller, J. Tetens, J. Pott, M. Piechotta, W. Grünberg |
Germany |
VIT |
||
11:50 |
General discussuin on "National / International breeding objectives and structure, and new traits" |