Differences between revisions 32 and 37 (spanning 5 versions)
Revision 32 as of 2017-07-11 10:30:29
Size: 19917
Editor: Valentina
Comment:
Revision 37 as of 2017-07-11 10:37:38
Size: 20230
Editor: Valentina
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
||<tablewidth="200px"> {{attachment:ibc_logo.jpg}} || {{attachment:EAAP_logo.png}} ||
Line 3: Line 4:
||<tablewidth="200px"> || ||




2017 Interbull Meeting

Date:
August 25 - 28, 2017
= 2017 Interbull Meeting =
August 25 - 28, 2017 Tallinn, Estonia
Line 35: Line 30:

Download the scientific progarm as [[attachment:Program_Open_Meeting.pdf|pdf|&do=get]]
Line 36: Line 34:
||<class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center;vertical-align:top" |26>'''Saturday, August 26th''' ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |6>'''Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genomic evaluations (1) ''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:''TBA'' ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">08:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">N. Friggens ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Genomic management tools to optimize resilience and efficiency ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">C. Kaya, A.W.M. Roozen ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">France ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">INRA ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">08:45 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">E. Groeneveld ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Large scale SNP data management and integration in breeding programs ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; "> ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">FLI ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:00 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">W.M. Stoop ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Genomics in small populations: the MRY breed ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">G. Veninga, G. de Jong, F. Reinhardt ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">the Netherlands ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">CRV BV ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:15 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Alkhoder ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">The impact of adding cows to the !EuroGenomics bull reference population on genomic prediction ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Z. Liu, F. Reinhardt ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">VIT ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Jorjani ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">!InterGenomics for Holstein populations ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Jorjani, V. Palucci, J. Sendecka ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#cc9900>Interbull Centre ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:45 ||||||||||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">General Discussion ||
||<class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center;vertical-align:top" |26>'''Saturday, August 26th''' ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |6>'''Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genomic evaluations (1) ''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:''TBA'' ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">08:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">N. Friggens ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">Genomic management tools to optimize resilience and efficiency ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">C. Kaya, A.W.M. Roozen ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">France ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">INRA ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">08:45 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">E. Groeneveld ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Large scale SNP data management and integration in breeding programs ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       "> ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">FLI ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:00 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">W.M. Stoop ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Genomics in small populations: the MRY breed ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">G. Veninga, G. de Jong, F. Reinhardt ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">the Netherlands ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">CRV BV ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:15 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Alkhoder ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">The impact of adding cows to the !EuroGenomics bull reference population on genomic prediction ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">Z. Liu, F. Reinhardt ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">VIT ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Jorjani ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">!InterGenomics for Holstein populations ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Jorjani, V. Palucci, J. Sendecka ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#cc9900>Interbull Centre ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:45 ||||||||||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">General Discussion ||
Line 43: Line 41:
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |8>'''Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genomic evaluations (2) ''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:''TBA'' ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:30 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">A. Kudinov ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Upgrading dairy cattle evaluation sustem in Russian Federation ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">J. Juga, P. Uimari, E.A. Mäntysaari, I. Strandén, K.V. Plemyashov, E.I. Saksa, M.G. Smaragdov ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Finland, Russian Federation ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">University of Helsinki, Russian Reserch Institute of Farm Animals Genetic and Breeding ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:45 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">R. Bonifazi ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Preliminary study of VCE for Limousine and Charolais breeds through Mix99 software ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">E. Hjerpe, T. Pabiou, H. Benhajali, H. Jorjani ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Interbull Centre ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">11:00 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">A. Govignon-Gion ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Genetic evaluation of calving ease for French beef cattle breeds with dairy maternal support ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Bouleisteix P., Brunet J.L., Delpeuch A., Miller S., Venot E., Mattalia S. ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">France ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Institut de l'Elevage ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">11:15 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">H. Täubert ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">A new model for the genetic evaluation for longevity in Germany ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">J. Heise, F. Reinhardt, R. Reents ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#8fbc8f>VIT ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">11:30 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">P. Amer ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Options for incorporating feed intake data into national selection indexes ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">S. Meier ||<#8fbc8f>New Zealand ||<#8fbc8f>!AbacusBio ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |8>'''Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genomic evaluations (2) ''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:''TBA'' ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:30 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">A. Kudinov ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">Upgrading dairy cattle evaluation sustem in Russian Federation ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">J. Juga, P. Uimari, E.A. Mäntysaari, I. Strandén, K.V. Plemyashov, E.I. Saksa, M.G. Smaragdov ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Finland, Russian Federation ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">University of Helsinki, Russian Reserch Institute of Farm Animals Genetic and Breeding ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:45 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">R. Bonifazi ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Preliminary study of VCE for Limousine and Charolais breeds through Mix99 software ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">E. Hjerpe, T. Pabiou, H. Benhajali, H. Jorjani ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Interbull Centre ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">11:00 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">A. Govignon-Gion ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Genetic evaluation of calving ease for French beef cattle breeds with dairy maternal support ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">Bouleisteix P., Brunet J.L., Delpeuch A., Miller S., Venot E., Mattalia S. ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">France ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Institut de l'Elevage ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">11:15 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">H. Täubert ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">A new model for the genetic evaluation for longevity in Germany ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">J. Heise, F. Reinhardt, R. Reents ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#8fbc8f>VIT ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">11:30 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">P. Amer ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Options for incorporating feed intake data into national selection indexes ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">S. Meier ||<#8fbc8f>New Zealand ||<#8fbc8f>!AbacusBio ||
Line 54: Line 52:
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |7>'''Model choice & Validation of GES in the genomic era (3) ''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:''TBA'' ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:00 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">I. Misztal ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Studies on inflation of GEBV in single-step GBLUP for type ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">S. Tsuruta, Y. Masuda, D. Lourenco, T. J. Lawlor ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USA ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">University of Georgia ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">B. Harris ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Experiencing solving large scale single step marker best linear unbiased models ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; "> ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">New Zealand ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">LIC ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:45 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">C. Edel ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Do biased gene-content estimates inflate genomic predictions with single-step GBLUP? ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Pimentel, E.C.G.; Emmerling, R. and Götz, K.-U. ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Bavarian State Research Center For Agriculture, Institute of Animal Breeding ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:00 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">S. Rensing ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Cow reference population - benefit for genomic evaluation system and farmers ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">H. Alkhoder, C. Kubitz, S. Schierenbeck and D. Segelke ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#66cdaa>VIT ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:15 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">R. Bonifazi ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Comparison of genomic reliability in national genomic evaluation of dairy cattle populations ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">V. Palucci, E. Hjerpe, F. M. Sarti, E. Lasagna, H. Jorjani, H. Benhajali ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#66cdaa>Interbull Centre ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">R. Bonifazi (presented by H. Jorjani) ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Speed up rG estimation ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">H. Benhajali, T. Pabiou, E. Hjerpe, M. Lidauer, H. Jorjani ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#66cdaa>Interbull Centre ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |7>'''Model choice & Validation of GES in the genomic era (3) ''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:''TBA'' ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:00 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">I. Misztal ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">Studies on inflation of GEBV in single-step GBLUP for type ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">S. Tsuruta, Y. Masuda, D. Lourenco, T. J. Lawlor ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USA ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">University of Georgia ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">B. Harris ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Experiencing solving large scale single step marker best linear unbiased models ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       "> ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">New Zealand ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">LIC ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:45 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">C. Edel ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Do biased gene-content estimates inflate genomic predictions with single-step GBLUP? ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">Pimentel, E.C.G.; Emmerling, R. and Götz, K.-U. ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Bavarian State Research Center For Agriculture, Institute of Animal Breeding ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:00 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">S. Rensing ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">Cow reference population - benefit for genomic evaluation system and farmers ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">H. Alkhoder, C. Kubitz, S. Schierenbeck and D. Segelke ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#66cdaa>VIT ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:15 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">R. Bonifazi ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">Comparison of genomic reliability in national genomic evaluation of dairy cattle populations ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">V. Palucci, E. Hjerpe, F. M. Sarti, E. Lasagna, H. Jorjani, H. Benhajali ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#66cdaa>Interbull Centre ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">R. Bonifazi (presented by H. Jorjani) ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">Speed up rG estimation ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">H. Benhajali, T. Pabiou, E. Hjerpe, M. Lidauer, H. Jorjani ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#66cdaa>Interbull Centre ||
Line 62: Line 60:
||<style="text-align:center;vertical-align:top" |11>'''Sunday, August 27th''' ||<#ffc0cb style="text-align:center" |4>'''Impact of genomic pre-selection on N-GES and I-GES (MACE) + Model choice & validation of GES in the genomic era (4) <<BR>> <<BR>>''' '''Chair:''' ''TBA'' ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">I. J. P. Vermeer ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Bias in proofs of non-random used sire ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">J.J. Vosman, G. de Jong ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">the Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CRV ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:45 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">M. Koivula ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Validation of genomic and genetic evaluations in 305d production traits of nordic Holstein cattle ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">I. Strandén, G. P. Aamand, Esa A. Mäntysaari ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Finland ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">LUKE ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Z. Liu ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Approximating genomic reliabilities for national genomic evaluation ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">P. M. !VanRaden, M. Lidauer, M. P. Calus, H. Benhajali, H. Jorjani and V. Ducrocq ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">VIT ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top"> ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">General Discussion ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; "> ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected"> ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected"> ||
||<style="text-align:center;vertical-align:top" |11>'''Sunday, August 27th''' ||<#ffc0cb style="text-align:center" |4>'''Impact of genomic pre-selection on N-GES and I-GES (MACE) + Model choice & validation of GES in the genomic era (4) <<BR>> <<BR>>''' '''Chair:''' ''TBA'' ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">I. J. P. Vermeer ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">Bias in proofs of non-random used sire ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">J.J. Vosman, G. de Jong ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">the Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CRV ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:45 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">M. Koivula ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Validation of genomic and genetic evaluations in 305d production traits of nordic Holstein cattle ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">I. Strandén, G. P. Aamand, Esa A. Mäntysaari ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Finland ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">LUKE ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Z. Liu ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Approximating genomic reliabilities for national genomic evaluation ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">P. M. !VanRaden, M. Lidauer, M. P. Calus, H. Benhajali, H. Jorjani and V. Ducrocq ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">VIT ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top"> ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">General Discussion ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       "> ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected"> ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected"> ||
Line 67: Line 65:
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top;text-align:center" |6>'''Intergration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genetic evaluations (5) <<BR>> <<BR>>''' '''Chair:''' ''TBA'' ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">10:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">I. Rukin ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Development of milk data control system for reducing the bias of genomic evaluation for the Russian Holstein breed ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Pantiukh K., Rysina M., Knyazeva T., Grouzdev D. ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Russian Federation ||<#ffc0cb>Moscow State University, I Gene LLC, All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Breeding ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">10:45 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">K. Stachowicz ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Genetic parameters of cow functional survival and conformation traits with recommendations for genetic evaluation ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">C. Quinton, S. Meyer, P. Amer, C. Phyn ||<#ffc0cb>New Zealand ||<#ffc0cb>!AbacusBio ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">11:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">A.M. Tyrisevä ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Evaluation of conception rate in nordic dairy cattle ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Muuttoranta, K., Pösö, J., Nielsen, U. S., Eriksson, J.-Å., Aamand, G.P., Mäntysaari, E. A., and M.H. Lidauer ||<#ffc0cb>Finland ||<#ffc0cb>LUKE ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">11:15 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">M. van Pelt ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Improving the genetic evaluation for longevity in the Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">G. de Jong, R. Veerkamp ||<#ffc0cb>the Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb>CRV ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">11:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">B. Fuerst-Waltl ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Phenotypic and genetic relationships between subclinical ketosis, body condition score, fat-protein ratio and other diseases in Austrian Fleckvieh cows ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">A. Köck, F. Steininger, C. Fuerst, C. Egger-Danner ||<#ffc0cb>Austria ||<#ffc0cb>University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top;text-align:center" |6>'''Intergration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genetic evaluations (5) <<BR>> <<BR>>''' '''Chair:''' ''TBA'' ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">10:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">I. Rukin ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Development of milk data control system for reducing the bias of genomic evaluation for the Russian Holstein breed ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Pantiukh K., Rysina M., Knyazeva T., Grouzdev D. ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Russian Federation ||<#ffc0cb>Moscow State University, I Gene LLC, All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Breeding ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">10:45 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">K. Stachowicz ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Genetic parameters of cow functional survival and conformation traits with recommendations for genetic evaluation ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">C. Quinton, S. Meyer, P. Amer, C. Phyn ||<#ffc0cb>New Zealand ||<#ffc0cb>!AbacusBio ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">11:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">A.M. Tyrisevä ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Evaluation of conception rate in nordic dairy cattle ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Muuttoranta, K., Pösö, J., Nielsen, U. S., Eriksson, J.-Å., Aamand, G.P., Mäntysaari, E. A., and M.H. Lidauer ||<#ffc0cb>Finland ||<#ffc0cb>LUKE ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">11:15 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">M. van Pelt ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Improving the genetic evaluation for longevity in the Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">G. de Jong, R. Veerkamp ||<#ffc0cb>the Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb>CRV ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;       ">11:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">B. Fuerst-Waltl ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Phenotypic and genetic relationships between subclinical ketosis, body condition score, fat-protein ratio and other diseases in Austrian Fleckvieh cows ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">A. Köck, F. Steininger, C. Fuerst, C. Egger-Danner ||<#ffc0cb>Austria ||<#ffc0cb>University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences ||
Line 75: Line 73:

ibc_logo.jpg

EAAP_logo.png

2017 Interbull Meeting

August 25 - 28, 2017 Tallinn, Estonia

General Program - Interbull Activities

Day

Time

Location

Interbull Annual Meeting

Friday 25 August

08:00 to 12:30

Interbull Technical Committee (+ SAC) Meeting 1

13:00 to 19:00

Interbull Steering Committee (+ SAC) Meeting 1

Saturday, 26 August

08:30 to 12:30

Interbull Open Meetings (1+2)

13:30 to 15:30

Interbull Business Meeting 1

16:00 to 18:00

Interbull Open Meetings (3)

19:00 to 22:00

Interbull Dinner

Sunday, 27 August

08:30 to 12:00

Interbull Open Meetings (4+5)

13:00 to 15:00

Interbull Business Meeting 2

15:15 to 17:00

Interbull Technical Committee (+ SAC) Meeting 2

17:00 to 19:00

Interbull Steering Committee Meeting 2

Monday, 28 August

08:30 to 12:30

Joint Session with EAAP Genetics or Cattle Commission

EAAP

14:00 to 18:00

Joint Session with EAAP Genetics or Cattle Commission

EAAP

Technical and Steering Committee Meetings are administrative meetings restricted to the respective members, and include joint sessions with Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) where indicated; Business Meetings are public and are dedicated to discuss operational and political decisions of the Steering Committee with participating organizations; Open Meetings are dedicated to scientific reports.


Scientific Program - Interbull Open Session

Download the scientific progarm as pdf

Session

Time

Author

Scientific report title

Other authors

Country

Organization

Saturday, August 26th

Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genomic evaluations (1)

Chair:TBA

08:30

N. Friggens

Genomic management tools to optimize resilience and efficiency

C. Kaya, A.W.M. Roozen

France

INRA

08:45

E. Groeneveld

Large scale SNP data management and integration in breeding programs

Germany

FLI

09:00

W.M. Stoop

Genomics in small populations: the MRY breed

G. Veninga, G. de Jong, F. Reinhardt

the Netherlands

CRV BV

09:15

H. Alkhoder

The impact of adding cows to the EuroGenomics bull reference population on genomic prediction

Z. Liu, F. Reinhardt

Germany

VIT

09:30

H. Jorjani

InterGenomics for Holstein populations

H. Jorjani, V. Palucci, J. Sendecka

Sweden

Interbull Centre

09:45

General Discussion

10:00

Coffee Break

Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genomic evaluations (2)

Chair:TBA

10:30

A. Kudinov

Upgrading dairy cattle evaluation sustem in Russian Federation

J. Juga, P. Uimari, E.A. Mäntysaari, I. Strandén, K.V. Plemyashov, E.I. Saksa, M.G. Smaragdov

Finland, Russian Federation

University of Helsinki, Russian Reserch Institute of Farm Animals Genetic and Breeding

10:45

R. Bonifazi

Preliminary study of VCE for Limousine and Charolais breeds through Mix99 software

E. Hjerpe, T. Pabiou, H. Benhajali, H. Jorjani

Sweden

Interbull Centre

11:00

A. Govignon-Gion

Genetic evaluation of calving ease for French beef cattle breeds with dairy maternal support

Bouleisteix P., Brunet J.L., Delpeuch A., Miller S., Venot E., Mattalia S.

France

Institut de l'Elevage

11:15

H. Täubert

A new model for the genetic evaluation for longevity in Germany

J. Heise, F. Reinhardt, R. Reents

Germany

VIT

11:30

P. Amer

Options for incorporating feed intake data into national selection indexes

S. Meier

New Zealand

AbacusBio

11:45

L. Chavinskaia

International order of cattle breeding. Interbull as a space of commensuration

France

INRA

12:00

Z. Liu (presented by H. Jorjani)

SNP-MACE

H. Jorjani

Germany

VIT

12:15

General Discussion

12:30 -13:30

Lunch

13:30 - 15:30

Interbull Business meeting 1

15:30 - 16:00

Coffee Break

Model choice & Validation of GES in the genomic era (3)

Chair:TBA

16:00

I. Misztal

Studies on inflation of GEBV in single-step GBLUP for type

S. Tsuruta, Y. Masuda, D. Lourenco, T. J. Lawlor

USA

University of Georgia

16:30

B. Harris

Experiencing solving large scale single step marker best linear unbiased models

New Zealand

LIC

16:45

C. Edel

Do biased gene-content estimates inflate genomic predictions with single-step GBLUP?

Pimentel, E.C.G.; Emmerling, R. and Götz, K.-U.

Germany

Bavarian State Research Center For Agriculture, Institute of Animal Breeding

17:00

S. Rensing

Cow reference population - benefit for genomic evaluation system and farmers

H. Alkhoder, C. Kubitz, S. Schierenbeck and D. Segelke

Germany

VIT

17:15

R. Bonifazi

Comparison of genomic reliability in national genomic evaluation of dairy cattle populations

V. Palucci, E. Hjerpe, F. M. Sarti, E. Lasagna, H. Jorjani, H. Benhajali

Sweden

Interbull Centre

17:30

R. Bonifazi (presented by H. Jorjani)

Speed up rG estimation

H. Benhajali, T. Pabiou, E. Hjerpe, M. Lidauer, H. Jorjani

Sweden

Interbull Centre

17:45

General Discussion

19:00 - 22:00

Interbull Dinner

Sunday, August 27th

Impact of genomic pre-selection on N-GES and I-GES (MACE) + Model choice & validation of GES in the genomic era (4)

Chair: TBA

08:30

I. J. P. Vermeer

Bias in proofs of non-random used sire

J.J. Vosman, G. de Jong

the Netherlands

CRV

08:45

M. Koivula

Validation of genomic and genetic evaluations in 305d production traits of nordic Holstein cattle

I. Strandén, G. P. Aamand, Esa A. Mäntysaari

Finland

LUKE

09:00

Z. Liu

Approximating genomic reliabilities for national genomic evaluation

P. M. VanRaden, M. Lidauer, M. P. Calus, H. Benhajali, H. Jorjani and V. Ducrocq

Germany

VIT

09:30

General Discussion

10:00 - 10:30

Coffee Breack

Intergration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genetic evaluations (5)

Chair: TBA

10:30

I. Rukin

Development of milk data control system for reducing the bias of genomic evaluation for the Russian Holstein breed

Pantiukh K., Rysina M., Knyazeva T., Grouzdev D.

Russian Federation

Moscow State University, I Gene LLC, All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Breeding

10:45

K. Stachowicz

Genetic parameters of cow functional survival and conformation traits with recommendations for genetic evaluation

C. Quinton, S. Meyer, P. Amer, C. Phyn

New Zealand

AbacusBio

11:00

A.M. Tyrisevä

Evaluation of conception rate in nordic dairy cattle

Muuttoranta, K., Pösö, J., Nielsen, U. S., Eriksson, J.-Å., Aamand, G.P., Mäntysaari, E. A., and M.H. Lidauer

Finland

LUKE

11:15

M. van Pelt

Improving the genetic evaluation for longevity in the Netherlands

G. de Jong, R. Veerkamp

the Netherlands

CRV

11:30

B. Fuerst-Waltl

Phenotypic and genetic relationships between subclinical ketosis, body condition score, fat-protein ratio and other diseases in Austrian Fleckvieh cows

A. Köck, F. Steininger, C. Fuerst, C. Egger-Danner

Austria

University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences

11:45

J. Cole

Development of genomic evaluations for direct measures of health in U.S. Holsteins and their correlations with fitness traits

K.L. Parker Gaddis, M.E. Tooker, J.R. Wright, J.H. Megonigal, Jr., J.S. Clay, and P.M. VanRaden

USA

Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, ARS, USDA

12:00 - 12:30

Lunch

13:00 - 15:00

Interbull Business Meeting 2

public/Tallinn2017 (last edited 2017-08-21 15:04:04 by Valentina)