Differences between revisions 33 and 40 (spanning 7 versions)
Revision 33 as of 2017-07-11 10:31:04
Size: 19989
Editor: Valentina
Comment:
Revision 40 as of 2017-08-07 14:55:04
Size: 27771
Editor: Valentina
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
||<tablewidth="200px"> {{attachment:ibc_logo.jpg}} || || ||<tablewidth="200px"> {{attachment:ibc_logo.jpg}} || {{attachment:EAAP_logo.png}} ||
Line 4: Line 4:
2017 Interbull Meeting

Date:
August 25 - 28, 2017
= 2017 Interbull Meeting =
August 25 - 28, 2017 Tallinn, Estonia
Line 21: Line 20:
||<width="197px" class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">'''Monday, 28 August''' ||<width="217px" class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:30 to 12:30 ||<width="246px" class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Joint Session with EAAP Genetics or Cattle Commission ||<width="205px" class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">EAAP ||
||<#e099ae class="mceSelected">''' ''' ||<#e099ae class="mceSelected">14:00 to 18:00 ||<#e099ae class="mceSelected">Joint Session with EAAP Genetics or Cattle Commission ||<#e099ae class="mceSelected">EAAP ||
||<width="197px" class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">'''Monday, 28 August''' ||<width="217px" class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:30 to 12:30 ||<width="246px" class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Joint Interbull – EAAP Session. Session 1: Managing genetic diversity in cattle in the era of genomic selection ||<width="205px" class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">EAAP ||
||<#e099ae width="197px" class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top"> ||<#e099ae width="197px" class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">14:00 to 18:30 ||<#e099ae width="197px" class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Joint Interbull – EAAP Session. Session 7: Genetic defects in cattle – identification, finding the mutation and managing it in breeding plans ||<#e099ae width="197px" class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">EAAP ||
Line 31: Line 30:
Download the scientific progarm as [[attachment:Program_Open_Meeting.pdf|pdf|&do=get]]
Line 32: Line 32:
||<class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center;vertical-align:top" |26>'''Saturday, August 26th''' ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |6>'''Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genomic evaluations (1) ''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:''TBA'' ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">08:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">N. Friggens ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Genomic management tools to optimize resilience and efficiency ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">C. Kaya, A.W.M. Roozen ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">France ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">INRA ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">08:45 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">E. Groeneveld ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Large scale SNP data management and integration in breeding programs ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; "> ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">FLI ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:00 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">W.M. Stoop ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Genomics in small populations: the MRY breed ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">G. Veninga, G. de Jong, F. Reinhardt ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">the Netherlands ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">CRV BV ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:15 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Alkhoder ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">The impact of adding cows to the !EuroGenomics bull reference population on genomic prediction ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Z. Liu, F. Reinhardt ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">VIT ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Jorjani ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">!InterGenomics for Holstein populations ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Jorjani, V. Palucci, J. Sendecka ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#cc9900>Interbull Centre ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:45 ||||||||||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">General Discussion ||
||<class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center;vertical-align:top" |26>'''Saturday, August 26th''' ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |6>'''Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genomic evaluations (1) ''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:''TBA'' ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">08:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">N. Friggens ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">Genomic management tools to optimize resilience and efficiency ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">C. Kaya, A.W.M. Roozen ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">France ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">INRA ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">08:45 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">E. Groeneveld ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Large scale SNP data management and integration in breeding programs ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  "> ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">FLI ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:00 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">W.M. Stoop ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Genomics in small populations: the MRY breed ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">G. Veninga, G. de Jong, F. Reinhardt ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">the Netherlands ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">CRV BV ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:15 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Alkhoder ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">The impact of adding cows to the !EuroGenomics bull reference population on genomic prediction ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">Z. Liu, F. Reinhardt ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">VIT ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Jorjani ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">!InterGenomics for Holstein populations ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Jorjani, V. Palucci, J. Sendecka ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#cc9900>Interbull Centre ||
||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:45 ||||||||||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">General Discussion ||
Line 39: Line 39:
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |8>'''Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genomic evaluations (2) ''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:''TBA'' ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:30 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">A. Kudinov ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Upgrading dairy cattle evaluation sustem in Russian Federation ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">J. Juga, P. Uimari, E.A. Mäntysaari, I. Strandén, K.V. Plemyashov, E.I. Saksa, M.G. Smaragdov ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Finland, Russian Federation ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">University of Helsinki, Russian Reserch Institute of Farm Animals Genetic and Breeding ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:45 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">R. Bonifazi ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Preliminary study of VCE for Limousine and Charolais breeds through Mix99 software ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">E. Hjerpe, T. Pabiou, H. Benhajali, H. Jorjani ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Interbull Centre ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">11:00 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">A. Govignon-Gion ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Genetic evaluation of calving ease for French beef cattle breeds with dairy maternal support ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Bouleisteix P., Brunet J.L., Delpeuch A., Miller S., Venot E., Mattalia S. ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">France ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Institut de l'Elevage ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">11:15 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">H. Täubert ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">A new model for the genetic evaluation for longevity in Germany ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">J. Heise, F. Reinhardt, R. Reents ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#8fbc8f>VIT ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">11:30 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">P. Amer ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Options for incorporating feed intake data into national selection indexes ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">S. Meier ||<#8fbc8f>New Zealand ||<#8fbc8f>!AbacusBio ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |8>'''Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genomic evaluations (2) ''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:''TBA'' ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:30 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">A. Kudinov ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">Upgrading dairy cattle evaluation sustem in Russian Federation ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">J. Juga, P. Uimari, E.A. Mäntysaari, I. Strandén, K.V. Plemyashov, E.I. Saksa, M.G. Smaragdov ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Finland, Russian Federation ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">University of Helsinki, Russian Reserch Institute of Farm Animals Genetic and Breeding ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:45 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">R. Bonifazi ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Preliminary study of VCE for Limousine and Charolais breeds through Mix99 software ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">E. Hjerpe, T. Pabiou, H. Benhajali, H. Jorjani ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Interbull Centre ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">11:00 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">A. Govignon-Gion ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Genetic evaluation of calving ease for French beef cattle breeds with dairy maternal support ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">Bouleisteix P., Brunet J.L., Delpeuch A., Miller S., Venot E., Mattalia S. ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">France ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Institut de l'Elevage ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">11:15 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">H. Täubert ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">A new model for the genetic evaluation for longevity in Germany ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">J. Heise, F. Reinhardt, R. Reents ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#8fbc8f>VIT ||
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">11:30 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">P. Amer ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Options for incorporating feed intake data into national selection indexes ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">S. Meier ||<#8fbc8f>New Zealand ||<#8fbc8f>!AbacusBio ||
Line 50: Line 50:
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |7>'''Model choice & Validation of GES in the genomic era (3) ''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:''TBA'' ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:00 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">I. Misztal ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Studies on inflation of GEBV in single-step GBLUP for type ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">S. Tsuruta, Y. Masuda, D. Lourenco, T. J. Lawlor ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USA ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">University of Georgia ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">B. Harris ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Experiencing solving large scale single step marker best linear unbiased models ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; "> ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">New Zealand ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">LIC ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:45 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">C. Edel ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Do biased gene-content estimates inflate genomic predictions with single-step GBLUP? ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Pimentel, E.C.G.; Emmerling, R. and Götz, K.-U. ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Bavarian State Research Center For Agriculture, Institute of Animal Breeding ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:00 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">S. Rensing ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Cow reference population - benefit for genomic evaluation system and farmers ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">H. Alkhoder, C. Kubitz, S. Schierenbeck and D. Segelke ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#66cdaa>VIT ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:15 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">R. Bonifazi ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Comparison of genomic reliability in national genomic evaluation of dairy cattle populations ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">V. Palucci, E. Hjerpe, F. M. Sarti, E. Lasagna, H. Jorjani, H. Benhajali ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#66cdaa>Interbull Centre ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">R. Bonifazi (presented by H. Jorjani) ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Speed up rG estimation ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">H. Benhajali, T. Pabiou, E. Hjerpe, M. Lidauer, H. Jorjani ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#66cdaa>Interbull Centre ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |7>'''Model choice & Validation of GES in the genomic era (3) ''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:''TBA'' ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:00 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">I. Misztal ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">Studies on inflation of GEBV in single-step GBLUP for type ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">S. Tsuruta, Y. Masuda, D. Lourenco, T. J. Lawlor ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USA ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">University of Georgia ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">B. Harris ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Experiencing solving large scale single step marker best linear unbiased models ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  "> ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">New Zealand ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">LIC ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:45 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">C. Edel ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Do biased gene-content estimates inflate genomic predictions with single-step GBLUP? ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">Pimentel, E.C.G.; Emmerling, R. and Götz, K.-U. ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Bavarian State Research Center For Agriculture, Institute of Animal Breeding ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:00 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">S. Rensing ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">Cow reference population - benefit for genomic evaluation system and farmers ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">H. Alkhoder, C. Kubitz, S. Schierenbeck and D. Segelke ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#66cdaa>VIT ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:15 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">R. Bonifazi ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">Comparison of genomic reliability in national genomic evaluation of dairy cattle populations ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">V. Palucci, E. Hjerpe, F. M. Sarti, E. Lasagna, H. Jorjani, H. Benhajali ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#66cdaa>Interbull Centre ||
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">R. Bonifazi (presented by H. Jorjani) ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">Speed up rG estimation ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">H. Benhajali, T. Pabiou, E. Hjerpe, M. Lidauer, H. Jorjani ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#66cdaa>Interbull Centre ||
Line 58: Line 58:
||<style="text-align:center;vertical-align:top" |11>'''Sunday, August 27th''' ||<#ffc0cb style="text-align:center" |4>'''Impact of genomic pre-selection on N-GES and I-GES (MACE) + Model choice & validation of GES in the genomic era (4) <<BR>> <<BR>>''' '''Chair:''' ''TBA'' ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">I. J. P. Vermeer ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Bias in proofs of non-random used sire ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">J.J. Vosman, G. de Jong ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">the Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CRV ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:45 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">M. Koivula ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Validation of genomic and genetic evaluations in 305d production traits of nordic Holstein cattle ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">I. Strandén, G. P. Aamand, Esa A. Mäntysaari ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Finland ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">LUKE ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Z. Liu ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Approximating genomic reliabilities for national genomic evaluation ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">P. M. !VanRaden, M. Lidauer, M. P. Calus, H. Benhajali, H. Jorjani and V. Ducrocq ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">VIT ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top"> ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">General Discussion ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; "> ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected"> ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected"> ||
||<style="text-align:center;vertical-align:top" |13>'''Sunday, August 27th''' ||<#ffc0cb style="text-align:center" |4>'''Impact of genomic pre-selection on N-GES and I-GES (MACE) + Model choice & validation of GES in the genomic era (4) <<BR>> <<BR>>''' '''Chair:''' ''TBA'' ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">I. J. P. Vermeer ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">Bias in proofs of non-random used sire ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">J.J. Vosman, G. de Jong ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">the Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CRV ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:45 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">M. Koivula ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Validation of genomic and genetic evaluations in 305d production traits of nordic Holstein cattle ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">I. Strandén, G. P. Aamand, Esa A. Mäntysaari ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Finland ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">LUKE ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Z. Liu ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Approximating genomic reliabilities for national genomic evaluation ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">P. M. !VanRaden, M. Lidauer, M. P. Calus, H. Benhajali, H. Jorjani and V. Ducrocq ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">VIT ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top"> ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">General Discussion ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  "> ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected"> ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected"> ||
Line 63: Line 63:
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top;text-align:center" |6>'''Intergration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genetic evaluations (5) <<BR>> <<BR>>''' '''Chair:''' ''TBA'' ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">10:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">I. Rukin ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Development of milk data control system for reducing the bias of genomic evaluation for the Russian Holstein breed ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Pantiukh K., Rysina M., Knyazeva T., Grouzdev D. ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Russian Federation ||<#ffc0cb>Moscow State University, I Gene LLC, All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Breeding ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">10:45 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">K. Stachowicz ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Genetic parameters of cow functional survival and conformation traits with recommendations for genetic evaluation ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">C. Quinton, S. Meyer, P. Amer, C. Phyn ||<#ffc0cb>New Zealand ||<#ffc0cb>!AbacusBio ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">11:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">A.M. Tyrisevä ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Evaluation of conception rate in nordic dairy cattle ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Muuttoranta, K., Pösö, J., Nielsen, U. S., Eriksson, J.-Å., Aamand, G.P., Mäntysaari, E. A., and M.H. Lidauer ||<#ffc0cb>Finland ||<#ffc0cb>LUKE ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">11:15 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">M. van Pelt ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Improving the genetic evaluation for longevity in the Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">G. de Jong, R. Veerkamp ||<#ffc0cb>the Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb>CRV ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">11:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">B. Fuerst-Waltl ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Phenotypic and genetic relationships between subclinical ketosis, body condition score, fat-protein ratio and other diseases in Austrian Fleckvieh cows ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">A. Köck, F. Steininger, C. Fuerst, C. Egger-Danner ||<#ffc0cb>Austria ||<#ffc0cb>University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top;text-align:center" |6>'''Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genetic evaluations (5) <<BR>> <<BR>>''' '''Chair:''' ''TBA'' ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">10:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">I. Rukin ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Development of milk data control system for reducing the bias of genomic evaluation for the Russian Holstein breed ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Pantiukh K., Rysina M., Knyazeva T., Grouzdev D. ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Russian Federation ||<#ffc0cb>Moscow State University, I Gene LLC, All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Breeding ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">10:45 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">K. Stachowicz ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Genetic parameters of cow functional survival and conformation traits with recommendations for genetic evaluation ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">C. Quinton, S. Meyer, P. Amer, C. Phyn ||<#ffc0cb>New Zealand ||<#ffc0cb>!AbacusBio ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">11:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">A.M. Tyrisevä ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Evaluation of conception rate in nordic dairy cattle ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Muuttoranta, K., Pösö, J., Nielsen, U. S., Eriksson, J.-Å., Aamand, G.P., Mäntysaari, E. A., and M.H. Lidauer ||<#ffc0cb>Finland ||<#ffc0cb>LUKE ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">11:15 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">M. van Pelt ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Improving the genetic evaluation for longevity in the Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">G. de Jong, R. Veerkamp ||<#ffc0cb>the Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb>CRV ||
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left;                  ">11:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">B. Fuerst-Waltl ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Phenotypic and genetic relationships between subclinical ketosis, body condition score, fat-protein ratio and other diseases in Austrian Fleckvieh cows ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">A. Köck, F. Steininger, C. Fuerst, C. Egger-Danner ||<#ffc0cb>Austria ||<#ffc0cb>University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences ||
Line 69: Line 69:
|| ||<class="mceSelected"> ||<class="mceSelected">12:00 - 12:30 ||<class="mceSelected">Lunch ||
|| ||<class="mceSelected"> ||<class="mceSelected">13:00 - 15:00 ||<class="mceSelected">Interbull Business Meeting 2 ||
||<class="mceSelected"> ||<class="mceSelected">12:00 - 12:30 ||<class="mceSelected">Lunch ||
||<class="mceSelected"> ||<class="mceSelected">13:00 - 15:00 ||<class="mceSelected">Interbull Business Meeting 2 ||
||<class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |24>'''Monday, August 28th ''' ||<#99ccff class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |12>'''Joint Interbull – EAAP Session: <<BR>>''' '''Session 1: Managing genetic diversity in cattle in the era of genomic selection ''''''<<BR>> <<BR>>''' '''Chair:''Reinhard Reents''''' ||<#99ccff class="mceSelected">08:30 - 09:00 ||<#99ccff>P.M. Vanraden ||<#99ccff>Genomic tools to improve progress and preserve variation for future generations ||<#99ccff> ||<#99ccff>USA ||<#99ccff>Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, ARS, USDA ||
||<#99ccff class="mceSelected">09:00 - 09:15 ||<#99ccff>F. Hely ||<#99ccff>Genetic diversity of sires used in the Irish dairy industry ||<#99ccff>F. Kearney, A. Cromie, D. Matthews, P. Amer ||<#99ccff>New Zealand ||<#99ccff>!AbacusBio ||
||<#99ccff class="mceSelected">09:15 - 09:30 ||<#99ccff>J.R. Thomasen ||<#99ccff>Pedigree inbreeding underestimate true inbreeding in genomic dairy cattle breeding schemes ||<#99ccff>H. Liu, A.C. Sørensen ||<#99ccff>Denmark ||<#99ccff>Aarhus University ||
||<#99ccff class="mceSelected">09:30 - 09:45 ||<#99ccff>V. Kukučková ||<#99ccff>Genetic diversity measures of local European cattle breeds for conservation purposes ||<#99ccff>N. Moravčíková, I. Curik, M. Simčič, G. Mészáros, R. Kasarda ||<#99ccff>Slovakia ||<#99ccff>Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra ||
||<#99ccff class="mceSelected">09:45 - 10:00 ||<#99ccff>Y. Wang ||<#99ccff>Long-term impact of optimum contribution selection on breeds with historical introgression ||<#99ccff>J. Bennewitz, R. Wellmann ||<#99ccff>Germany ||<#99ccff>University of Hohenheim ||
||<#99ccff class="mceSelected">10:00 - 10:15 ||<#99ccff>D. Segelke ||<#99ccff>Using recombination to maintain genetic diversity ||<#99ccff>J. Heise, G. Thaller ||<#99ccff>Germany ||<#99ccff>VIT ||
||<#99ccff class="mceSelected">10:15 - 10:45 ||<#99ccff>S. Van Der Beek ||<#99ccff>Using genomics to manage progress and diversity: an industry perspective ||<#99ccff>H. Geertsema ||<#99ccff>The Netherlands ||<#99ccff>CRV ||
||<#99ccff class="mceSelected">10:45 - 11:00 ||<#99ccff>D. Hinrichs ||<#99ccff>Biodiversity within and between European Red dairy breeds – conservation through utilization ||<#99ccff>M. Calus, D.J. De-Koning, J. Bennewitz, T. Meuwissen, G. Thaller, J. Szyda, J. Tetens, V. Juskiene, B. Guldbrandtsen ||<#99ccff>Germany ||<#99ccff>Humboldt-University ||
||<#99ccff class="mceSelected">11:00 - 11:15 ||<#99ccff>S. Van Den Berg ||<#99ccff>The effect of using whole genome sequence instead of a lower density SNP chip on GWAS ||<#99ccff>R.F. Veerkamp, F.A. Van Eeuwijk, A.C. Bouwman, M.S. Lopes, J. Vandenplas ||<#99ccff>The Netherlands ||<#99ccff>Wageningen University and Research ||
||<#99ccff class="mceSelected">11:15 - 11:30 ||<#99ccff>I. Misztal ||<#99ccff>Genetic trends from single-step GBLUP and traditional BLUP for production traits in US Holstein ||<#99ccff>Y. Masuda, P.M. Vanraden, T.J. Lawlor ||<#99ccff>USA ||<#99ccff>University of Georgia ||
||<#99ccff class="mceSelected">11:30 - 11:45 ||<#99ccff>V. Ducrocq ||<#99ccff>Development of genomic selection in dairy cattle in two emerging countries: South Africa and India ||<#99ccff>L. Chavinskaia, M. Swaminathan, A. Pande, M. Van Niekerk, F.W.C. Neser ||<#99ccff>France ||<#99ccff>GABI, INRA, !AgroParisTech ||
||<#99ccff class="mceSelected">11:45 - 12:30 ||||||||||<#99ccff style="text-align:center">'''Poster Sessions''' ||
||<#99cc99 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |12>'''Joint Interbull – EAAP Session.<<BR>>Session 7: Genetic defects in cattle – identification, finding the mutation and managing it in breeding plans ''''''<<BR>> <<BR>>''' '''Chair:''Hossein Jorjani<<BR>>''''' ||<#99cc99 class="mceSelected">14:00 - 14:15 ||<#99cc99>H. Pausch ||<#99cc99>Implications of mosaicism for deleterious de novo mutations in artificial insemination bulls ||<#99cc99>C. Wurmser, S. Ammermueller, D. Segelke, A. Capitan, R. Fries ||<#99cc99>Germany ||<#99cc99>Animal Breeding, TU Muenchen ||
||<#99cc99 class="mceSelected">14:15 - 14:30 ||<#99cc99>F.R. Seefried ||<#99cc99>Genotype prediction for a structural variant in Brown Swiss cattle using Illumina Beadchip data ||<#99cc99>P. Von Rohr, C. Drögemüller ||<#99cc99>Switzerland ||<#99cc99>Qualitas ||
||<#99cc99 class="mceSelected">14:30 - 14:45 ||<#99cc99>P. Ajmone Marsan ||<#99cc99>Chasing deleterious recessives in Italian Holstein dairy cattle ||<#99cc99>M. Milanesi, S. Capomaccio, L. Colli, S. Biffani, J.T. Van Kaam, R. Finocchiaro, R.<<BR>>Negrini, C.J. Rubin, A. Nardone, N.P.P. Maciotta, J.L. Williams ||<#99cc99>Italy ||<#99cc99>Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore ||
||<#99cc99 class="mceSelected">14:45 - 15:00 ||<#99cc99>C. Grohs ||<#99cc99>Reverse genetics to describe a recessive defect in different breeds ||<#99cc99>P. Michot, S. Chahory, M.C. Deloche, S. Barbey, M. Boussaha, C. Danchin-Burge, S. Fritz, D.<<BR>>Boichard, A. Capitan ||<#99cc99>France ||<#99cc99>GABI, INRA, AgroParisTech ||
||<#99cc99 class="mceSelected">15:00 - 15:15 ||<#99cc99>T. Druet ||<#99cc99>Identification and management of recessive genetic defects in Belgian Blue beef cattle ||<#99cc99>A. Sartelet, X. Hubin, N. Tamma, M. Georges, C. Charlier ||<#99cc99>Belgium ||<#99cc99>Unit of Animal Genomics, GIGA-R ||
||<#99cc99 class="mceSelected">15:15 - 15:45 ||<#99cc99>G.E. Pollott ||<#99cc99>A review of bioinformatic methods to locate a new recessive mutation on the genome ||<#99cc99> ||<#99cc99>United Kingdom ||<#99cc99>Royal Veterinary College ||
||<#99cc99 class="mceSelected">15:45 - 16:00 ||<#99cc99>A.C. Sørensen ||<#99cc99>Managing lethal alleles using genomic optimum contribution selection ||<#99cc99>L. Hjortø, J.R. Thomasen, P. Berg, M. Kargo, M. Henryon, H. Liu ||<#99cc99>Denmark ||<#99cc99>Aarhus University ||
||<#99cc99 class="mceSelected">16:00 - 16:15 ||<#99cc99>C. Scheper ||<#99cc99>Using a MQTL matrix to test for pleiotropic effects of Mendelian trait loci on quantitative traits ||<#99cc99>S. König ||<#99cc99>Germany ||<#99cc99>LFL ||
||<#99cc99 class="mceSelected">16:15 - 16:30 ||<#99cc99>M.C. Mcclure ||<#99cc99>Bovine Genetic Disease and Trait Frequencies in Ireland: >85 causative alleles in >1M animals ||<#99cc99>P. Flynn, R. Weld, T. Pabiou, M. Mullen, J.F. Kearney ||<#99cc99>Ireland ||<#99cc99>ICBF ||
||<#99cc99 class="mceSelected">16:30 - 17:00 ||<#99cc99>J.B. Cole ||<#99cc99>Management of Mendelian traits in breeding programs by gene editing ||<#99cc99> ||<#99cc99>USA ||<#99cc99>USDA ||
||<#99cc99 class="mceSelected">17:00 - 17:30 ||<#99cc99>H. Jorjani ||<#99cc99>International registration and management of genetic defects: General discussion ||<#99cc99> ||<#99cc99>Sweden ||<#99cc99>Interbull Centre ||
||<#99cc99 class="mceSelected">17:30 - 18:00 ||||||||||<#99cc99 style="text-align:center">'''Poster Session''' ||

ibc_logo.jpg

EAAP_logo.png

2017 Interbull Meeting

August 25 - 28, 2017 Tallinn, Estonia

General Program - Interbull Activities

Day

Time

Location

Interbull Annual Meeting

Friday 25 August

08:00 to 12:30

Interbull Technical Committee (+ SAC) Meeting 1

13:00 to 19:00

Interbull Steering Committee (+ SAC) Meeting 1

Saturday, 26 August

08:30 to 12:30

Interbull Open Meetings (1+2)

13:30 to 15:30

Interbull Business Meeting 1

16:00 to 18:00

Interbull Open Meetings (3)

19:00 to 22:00

Interbull Dinner

Sunday, 27 August

08:30 to 12:00

Interbull Open Meetings (4+5)

13:00 to 15:00

Interbull Business Meeting 2

15:15 to 17:00

Interbull Technical Committee (+ SAC) Meeting 2

17:00 to 19:00

Interbull Steering Committee Meeting 2

Monday, 28 August

08:30 to 12:30

Joint Interbull – EAAP Session. Session 1: Managing genetic diversity in cattle in the era of genomic selection

EAAP

14:00 to 18:30

Joint Interbull – EAAP Session. Session 7: Genetic defects in cattle – identification, finding the mutation and managing it in breeding plans

EAAP

Technical and Steering Committee Meetings are administrative meetings restricted to the respective members, and include joint sessions with Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) where indicated; Business Meetings are public and are dedicated to discuss operational and political decisions of the Steering Committee with participating organizations; Open Meetings are dedicated to scientific reports.


Scientific Program - Interbull Open Session

Download the scientific progarm as pdf

Session

Time

Author

Scientific report title

Other authors

Country

Organization

Saturday, August 26th

Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genomic evaluations (1)

Chair:TBA

08:30

N. Friggens

Genomic management tools to optimize resilience and efficiency

C. Kaya, A.W.M. Roozen

France

INRA

08:45

E. Groeneveld

Large scale SNP data management and integration in breeding programs

Germany

FLI

09:00

W.M. Stoop

Genomics in small populations: the MRY breed

G. Veninga, G. de Jong, F. Reinhardt

the Netherlands

CRV BV

09:15

H. Alkhoder

The impact of adding cows to the EuroGenomics bull reference population on genomic prediction

Z. Liu, F. Reinhardt

Germany

VIT

09:30

H. Jorjani

InterGenomics for Holstein populations

H. Jorjani, V. Palucci, J. Sendecka

Sweden

Interbull Centre

09:45

General Discussion

10:00

Coffee Break

Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genomic evaluations (2)

Chair:TBA

10:30

A. Kudinov

Upgrading dairy cattle evaluation sustem in Russian Federation

J. Juga, P. Uimari, E.A. Mäntysaari, I. Strandén, K.V. Plemyashov, E.I. Saksa, M.G. Smaragdov

Finland, Russian Federation

University of Helsinki, Russian Reserch Institute of Farm Animals Genetic and Breeding

10:45

R. Bonifazi

Preliminary study of VCE for Limousine and Charolais breeds through Mix99 software

E. Hjerpe, T. Pabiou, H. Benhajali, H. Jorjani

Sweden

Interbull Centre

11:00

A. Govignon-Gion

Genetic evaluation of calving ease for French beef cattle breeds with dairy maternal support

Bouleisteix P., Brunet J.L., Delpeuch A., Miller S., Venot E., Mattalia S.

France

Institut de l'Elevage

11:15

H. Täubert

A new model for the genetic evaluation for longevity in Germany

J. Heise, F. Reinhardt, R. Reents

Germany

VIT

11:30

P. Amer

Options for incorporating feed intake data into national selection indexes

S. Meier

New Zealand

AbacusBio

11:45

L. Chavinskaia

International order of cattle breeding. Interbull as a space of commensuration

France

INRA

12:00

Z. Liu (presented by H. Jorjani)

SNP-MACE

H. Jorjani

Germany

VIT

12:15

General Discussion

12:30 -13:30

Lunch

13:30 - 15:30

Interbull Business meeting 1

15:30 - 16:00

Coffee Break

Model choice & Validation of GES in the genomic era (3)

Chair:TBA

16:00

I. Misztal

Studies on inflation of GEBV in single-step GBLUP for type

S. Tsuruta, Y. Masuda, D. Lourenco, T. J. Lawlor

USA

University of Georgia

16:30

B. Harris

Experiencing solving large scale single step marker best linear unbiased models

New Zealand

LIC

16:45

C. Edel

Do biased gene-content estimates inflate genomic predictions with single-step GBLUP?

Pimentel, E.C.G.; Emmerling, R. and Götz, K.-U.

Germany

Bavarian State Research Center For Agriculture, Institute of Animal Breeding

17:00

S. Rensing

Cow reference population - benefit for genomic evaluation system and farmers

H. Alkhoder, C. Kubitz, S. Schierenbeck and D. Segelke

Germany

VIT

17:15

R. Bonifazi

Comparison of genomic reliability in national genomic evaluation of dairy cattle populations

V. Palucci, E. Hjerpe, F. M. Sarti, E. Lasagna, H. Jorjani, H. Benhajali

Sweden

Interbull Centre

17:30

R. Bonifazi (presented by H. Jorjani)

Speed up rG estimation

H. Benhajali, T. Pabiou, E. Hjerpe, M. Lidauer, H. Jorjani

Sweden

Interbull Centre

17:45

General Discussion

19:00 - 22:00

Interbull Dinner

Sunday, August 27th

Impact of genomic pre-selection on N-GES and I-GES (MACE) + Model choice & validation of GES in the genomic era (4)

Chair: TBA

08:30

I. J. P. Vermeer

Bias in proofs of non-random used sire

J.J. Vosman, G. de Jong

the Netherlands

CRV

08:45

M. Koivula

Validation of genomic and genetic evaluations in 305d production traits of nordic Holstein cattle

I. Strandén, G. P. Aamand, Esa A. Mäntysaari

Finland

LUKE

09:00

Z. Liu

Approximating genomic reliabilities for national genomic evaluation

P. M. VanRaden, M. Lidauer, M. P. Calus, H. Benhajali, H. Jorjani and V. Ducrocq

Germany

VIT

09:30

General Discussion

10:00 - 10:30

Coffee Breack

Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genetic evaluations (5)

Chair: TBA

10:30

I. Rukin

Development of milk data control system for reducing the bias of genomic evaluation for the Russian Holstein breed

Pantiukh K., Rysina M., Knyazeva T., Grouzdev D.

Russian Federation

Moscow State University, I Gene LLC, All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Breeding

10:45

K. Stachowicz

Genetic parameters of cow functional survival and conformation traits with recommendations for genetic evaluation

C. Quinton, S. Meyer, P. Amer, C. Phyn

New Zealand

AbacusBio

11:00

A.M. Tyrisevä

Evaluation of conception rate in nordic dairy cattle

Muuttoranta, K., Pösö, J., Nielsen, U. S., Eriksson, J.-Å., Aamand, G.P., Mäntysaari, E. A., and M.H. Lidauer

Finland

LUKE

11:15

M. van Pelt

Improving the genetic evaluation for longevity in the Netherlands

G. de Jong, R. Veerkamp

the Netherlands

CRV

11:30

B. Fuerst-Waltl

Phenotypic and genetic relationships between subclinical ketosis, body condition score, fat-protein ratio and other diseases in Austrian Fleckvieh cows

A. Köck, F. Steininger, C. Fuerst, C. Egger-Danner

Austria

University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences

11:45

J. Cole

Development of genomic evaluations for direct measures of health in U.S. Holsteins and their correlations with fitness traits

K.L. Parker Gaddis, M.E. Tooker, J.R. Wright, J.H. Megonigal, Jr., J.S. Clay, and P.M. VanRaden

USA

Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, ARS, USDA

12:00 - 12:30

Lunch

13:00 - 15:00

Interbull Business Meeting 2

Monday, August 28th

Joint Interbull – EAAP Session:
Session 1: Managing genetic diversity in cattle in the era of genomic selection

Chair:Reinhard Reents

08:30 - 09:00

P.M. Vanraden

Genomic tools to improve progress and preserve variation for future generations

USA

Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, ARS, USDA

09:00 - 09:15

F. Hely

Genetic diversity of sires used in the Irish dairy industry

F. Kearney, A. Cromie, D. Matthews, P. Amer

New Zealand

AbacusBio

09:15 - 09:30

J.R. Thomasen

Pedigree inbreeding underestimate true inbreeding in genomic dairy cattle breeding schemes

H. Liu, A.C. Sørensen

Denmark

Aarhus University

09:30 - 09:45

V. Kukučková

Genetic diversity measures of local European cattle breeds for conservation purposes

N. Moravčíková, I. Curik, M. Simčič, G. Mészáros, R. Kasarda

Slovakia

Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra

09:45 - 10:00

Y. Wang

Long-term impact of optimum contribution selection on breeds with historical introgression

J. Bennewitz, R. Wellmann

Germany

University of Hohenheim

10:00 - 10:15

D. Segelke

Using recombination to maintain genetic diversity

J. Heise, G. Thaller

Germany

VIT

10:15 - 10:45

S. Van Der Beek

Using genomics to manage progress and diversity: an industry perspective

H. Geertsema

The Netherlands

CRV

10:45 - 11:00

D. Hinrichs

Biodiversity within and between European Red dairy breeds – conservation through utilization

M. Calus, D.J. De-Koning, J. Bennewitz, T. Meuwissen, G. Thaller, J. Szyda, J. Tetens, V. Juskiene, B. Guldbrandtsen

Germany

Humboldt-University

11:00 - 11:15

S. Van Den Berg

The effect of using whole genome sequence instead of a lower density SNP chip on GWAS

R.F. Veerkamp, F.A. Van Eeuwijk, A.C. Bouwman, M.S. Lopes, J. Vandenplas

The Netherlands

Wageningen University and Research

11:15 - 11:30

I. Misztal

Genetic trends from single-step GBLUP and traditional BLUP for production traits in US Holstein

Y. Masuda, P.M. Vanraden, T.J. Lawlor

USA

University of Georgia

11:30 - 11:45

V. Ducrocq

Development of genomic selection in dairy cattle in two emerging countries: South Africa and India

L. Chavinskaia, M. Swaminathan, A. Pande, M. Van Niekerk, F.W.C. Neser

France

GABI, INRA, AgroParisTech

11:45 - 12:30

Poster Sessions

Joint Interbull – EAAP Session.
Session 7: Genetic defects in cattle – identification, finding the mutation and managing it in breeding plans


Chair:Hossein Jorjani

14:00 - 14:15

H. Pausch

Implications of mosaicism for deleterious de novo mutations in artificial insemination bulls

C. Wurmser, S. Ammermueller, D. Segelke, A. Capitan, R. Fries

Germany

Animal Breeding, TU Muenchen

14:15 - 14:30

F.R. Seefried

Genotype prediction for a structural variant in Brown Swiss cattle using Illumina Beadchip data

P. Von Rohr, C. Drögemüller

Switzerland

Qualitas

14:30 - 14:45

P. Ajmone Marsan

Chasing deleterious recessives in Italian Holstein dairy cattle

M. Milanesi, S. Capomaccio, L. Colli, S. Biffani, J.T. Van Kaam, R. Finocchiaro, R.
Negrini, C.J. Rubin, A. Nardone, N.P.P. Maciotta, J.L. Williams

Italy

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

14:45 - 15:00

C. Grohs

Reverse genetics to describe a recessive defect in different breeds

P. Michot, S. Chahory, M.C. Deloche, S. Barbey, M. Boussaha, C. Danchin-Burge, S. Fritz, D.
Boichard, A. Capitan

France

GABI, INRA, AgroParisTech

15:00 - 15:15

T. Druet

Identification and management of recessive genetic defects in Belgian Blue beef cattle

A. Sartelet, X. Hubin, N. Tamma, M. Georges, C. Charlier

Belgium

Unit of Animal Genomics, GIGA-R

15:15 - 15:45

G.E. Pollott

A review of bioinformatic methods to locate a new recessive mutation on the genome

United Kingdom

Royal Veterinary College

15:45 - 16:00

A.C. Sørensen

Managing lethal alleles using genomic optimum contribution selection

L. Hjortø, J.R. Thomasen, P. Berg, M. Kargo, M. Henryon, H. Liu

Denmark

Aarhus University

16:00 - 16:15

C. Scheper

Using a MQTL matrix to test for pleiotropic effects of Mendelian trait loci on quantitative traits

S. König

Germany

LFL

16:15 - 16:30

M.C. Mcclure

Bovine Genetic Disease and Trait Frequencies in Ireland: >85 causative alleles in >1M animals

P. Flynn, R. Weld, T. Pabiou, M. Mullen, J.F. Kearney

Ireland

ICBF

16:30 - 17:00

J.B. Cole

Management of Mendelian traits in breeding programs by gene editing

USA

USDA

17:00 - 17:30

H. Jorjani

International registration and management of genetic defects: General discussion

Sweden

Interbull Centre

17:30 - 18:00

Poster Session

public/Tallinn2017 (last edited 2017-08-21 15:04:04 by Valentina)