20042
Comment:
|
20708
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 1: | Line 1: |
||<tablewidth="200px"> {{attachment:ibc_logo.jpg}} ||{{attachment:EAAP_logo.png}}|| | ||<tablewidth="200px"> {{attachment:ibc_logo.jpg}} || {{attachment:EAAP_logo.png}} || |
Line 4: | Line 4: |
2017 Interbull Meeting Date: August 25 - 28, 2017 |
= 2017 Interbull Meeting = August 25 - 28, 2017 Tallinn, Estonia |
Line 21: | Line 20: |
||<width="197px" class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">'''Monday, 28 August''' ||<width="217px" class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:30 to 12:30 ||<width="246px" class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Joint Session with EAAP Genetics or Cattle Commission ||<width="205px" class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">EAAP || ||<#e099ae class="mceSelected">''' ''' ||<#e099ae class="mceSelected">14:00 to 18:00 ||<#e099ae class="mceSelected">Joint Session with EAAP Genetics or Cattle Commission ||<#e099ae class="mceSelected">EAAP || |
||<width="197px" class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">'''Monday, 28 August''' ||<width="217px" class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:30 to 12:30 ||<width="246px" class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Joint Interbull – EAAP Session. Session 1: Managing genetic diversity in cattle in the era of genomic selection (with Interbull) ||<width="205px" class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">EAAP || ||<#e099ae class="mceSelected">''' ''' ||<#e099ae class="mceSelected">14:00 to 18:00 ||<#e099ae class="mceSelected">Joint Interbull – EAAP Session. Session 7: Genetic defects in cattle – identification, finding the mutation and managing it in breeding plans (with Interbull) ||<#e099ae class="mceSelected">EAAP || |
Line 31: | Line 32: |
Download the scientific progarm as [[attachment:Program_Open_Meeting.pdf|pdf|&do=get]] | |
Line 32: | Line 34: |
||<class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center;vertical-align:top" |26>'''Saturday, August 26th''' ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |6>'''Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genomic evaluations (1) ''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:''TBA'' ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">08:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">N. Friggens ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Genomic management tools to optimize resilience and efficiency ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">C. Kaya, A.W.M. Roozen ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">France ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">INRA || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">08:45 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">E. Groeneveld ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Large scale SNP data management and integration in breeding programs ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; "> ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">FLI || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:00 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">W.M. Stoop ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Genomics in small populations: the MRY breed ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">G. Veninga, G. de Jong, F. Reinhardt ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">the Netherlands ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">CRV BV || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:15 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Alkhoder ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">The impact of adding cows to the !EuroGenomics bull reference population on genomic prediction ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Z. Liu, F. Reinhardt ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">VIT || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Jorjani ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">!InterGenomics for Holstein populations ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Jorjani, V. Palucci, J. Sendecka ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#cc9900>Interbull Centre || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:45 ||||||||||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">General Discussion || |
||<class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center;vertical-align:top" |26>'''Saturday, August 26th''' ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |6>'''Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genomic evaluations (1) ''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:''TBA'' ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">08:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">N. Friggens ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Genomic management tools to optimize resilience and efficiency ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">C. Kaya, A.W.M. Roozen ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">France ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">INRA || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">08:45 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">E. Groeneveld ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Large scale SNP data management and integration in breeding programs ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; "> ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">FLI || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:00 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">W.M. Stoop ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Genomics in small populations: the MRY breed ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">G. Veninga, G. de Jong, F. Reinhardt ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">the Netherlands ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">CRV BV || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:15 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Alkhoder ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">The impact of adding cows to the !EuroGenomics bull reference population on genomic prediction ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Z. Liu, F. Reinhardt ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">VIT || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:30 ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Jorjani ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">!InterGenomics for Holstein populations ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">H. Jorjani, V. Palucci, J. Sendecka ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#cc9900>Interbull Centre || ||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected">09:45 ||||||||||<#cc9900 class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">General Discussion || |
Line 39: | Line 41: |
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |8>'''Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genomic evaluations (2) ''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:''TBA'' ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:30 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">A. Kudinov ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Upgrading dairy cattle evaluation sustem in Russian Federation ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">J. Juga, P. Uimari, E.A. Mäntysaari, I. Strandén, K.V. Plemyashov, E.I. Saksa, M.G. Smaragdov ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Finland, Russian Federation ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">University of Helsinki, Russian Reserch Institute of Farm Animals Genetic and Breeding || ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:45 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">R. Bonifazi ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Preliminary study of VCE for Limousine and Charolais breeds through Mix99 software ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">E. Hjerpe, T. Pabiou, H. Benhajali, H. Jorjani ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Interbull Centre || ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">11:00 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">A. Govignon-Gion ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Genetic evaluation of calving ease for French beef cattle breeds with dairy maternal support ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Bouleisteix P., Brunet J.L., Delpeuch A., Miller S., Venot E., Mattalia S. ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">France ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Institut de l'Elevage || ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">11:15 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">H. Täubert ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">A new model for the genetic evaluation for longevity in Germany ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">J. Heise, F. Reinhardt, R. Reents ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#8fbc8f>VIT || ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">11:30 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">P. Amer ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Options for incorporating feed intake data into national selection indexes ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">S. Meier ||<#8fbc8f>New Zealand ||<#8fbc8f>!AbacusBio || |
||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |8>'''Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genomic evaluations (2) ''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:''TBA'' ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:30 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">A. Kudinov ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Upgrading dairy cattle evaluation sustem in Russian Federation ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">J. Juga, P. Uimari, E.A. Mäntysaari, I. Strandén, K.V. Plemyashov, E.I. Saksa, M.G. Smaragdov ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Finland, Russian Federation ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">University of Helsinki, Russian Reserch Institute of Farm Animals Genetic and Breeding || ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">10:45 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">R. Bonifazi ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Preliminary study of VCE for Limousine and Charolais breeds through Mix99 software ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">E. Hjerpe, T. Pabiou, H. Benhajali, H. Jorjani ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Interbull Centre || ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">11:00 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">A. Govignon-Gion ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Genetic evaluation of calving ease for French beef cattle breeds with dairy maternal support ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Bouleisteix P., Brunet J.L., Delpeuch A., Miller S., Venot E., Mattalia S. ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">France ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Institut de l'Elevage || ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">11:15 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">H. Täubert ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">A new model for the genetic evaluation for longevity in Germany ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">J. Heise, F. Reinhardt, R. Reents ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#8fbc8f>VIT || ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">11:30 ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">P. Amer ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">Options for incorporating feed intake data into national selection indexes ||<#8fbc8f class="mceSelected">S. Meier ||<#8fbc8f>New Zealand ||<#8fbc8f>!AbacusBio || |
Line 50: | Line 52: |
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |7>'''Model choice & Validation of GES in the genomic era (3) ''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:''TBA'' ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:00 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">I. Misztal ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Studies on inflation of GEBV in single-step GBLUP for type ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">S. Tsuruta, Y. Masuda, D. Lourenco, T. J. Lawlor ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USA ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">University of Georgia || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">B. Harris ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Experiencing solving large scale single step marker best linear unbiased models ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; "> ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">New Zealand ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">LIC || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:45 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">C. Edel ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Do biased gene-content estimates inflate genomic predictions with single-step GBLUP? ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Pimentel, E.C.G.; Emmerling, R. and Götz, K.-U. ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Bavarian State Research Center For Agriculture, Institute of Animal Breeding || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:00 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">S. Rensing ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Cow reference population - benefit for genomic evaluation system and farmers ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">H. Alkhoder, C. Kubitz, S. Schierenbeck and D. Segelke ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#66cdaa>VIT || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:15 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">R. Bonifazi ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Comparison of genomic reliability in national genomic evaluation of dairy cattle populations ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">V. Palucci, E. Hjerpe, F. M. Sarti, E. Lasagna, H. Jorjani, H. Benhajali ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#66cdaa>Interbull Centre || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">R. Bonifazi (presented by H. Jorjani) ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Speed up rG estimation ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">H. Benhajali, T. Pabiou, E. Hjerpe, M. Lidauer, H. Jorjani ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#66cdaa>Interbull Centre || |
||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:center" |7>'''Model choice & Validation of GES in the genomic era (3) ''' <<BR>> <<BR>> Chair:''TBA'' ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:00 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">I. Misztal ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Studies on inflation of GEBV in single-step GBLUP for type ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">S. Tsuruta, Y. Masuda, D. Lourenco, T. J. Lawlor ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">USA ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">University of Georgia || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">B. Harris ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Experiencing solving large scale single step marker best linear unbiased models ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; "> ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">New Zealand ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">LIC || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">16:45 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">C. Edel ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Do biased gene-content estimates inflate genomic predictions with single-step GBLUP? ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Pimentel, E.C.G.; Emmerling, R. and Götz, K.-U. ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Bavarian State Research Center For Agriculture, Institute of Animal Breeding || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:00 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">S. Rensing ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Cow reference population - benefit for genomic evaluation system and farmers ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">H. Alkhoder, C. Kubitz, S. Schierenbeck and D. Segelke ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#66cdaa>VIT || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:15 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">R. Bonifazi ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Comparison of genomic reliability in national genomic evaluation of dairy cattle populations ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">V. Palucci, E. Hjerpe, F. M. Sarti, E. Lasagna, H. Jorjani, H. Benhajali ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#66cdaa>Interbull Centre || ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">17:30 ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">R. Bonifazi (presented by H. Jorjani) ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Speed up rG estimation ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">H. Benhajali, T. Pabiou, E. Hjerpe, M. Lidauer, H. Jorjani ||<#66cdaa class="mceSelected">Sweden ||<#66cdaa>Interbull Centre || |
Line 58: | Line 60: |
||<style="text-align:center;vertical-align:top" |11>'''Sunday, August 27th''' ||<#ffc0cb style="text-align:center" |4>'''Impact of genomic pre-selection on N-GES and I-GES (MACE) + Model choice & validation of GES in the genomic era (4) <<BR>> <<BR>>''' '''Chair:''' ''TBA'' ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">I. J. P. Vermeer ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Bias in proofs of non-random used sire ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">J.J. Vosman, G. de Jong ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">the Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CRV || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:45 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">M. Koivula ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Validation of genomic and genetic evaluations in 305d production traits of nordic Holstein cattle ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">I. Strandén, G. P. Aamand, Esa A. Mäntysaari ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Finland ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">LUKE || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Z. Liu ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Approximating genomic reliabilities for national genomic evaluation ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">P. M. !VanRaden, M. Lidauer, M. P. Calus, H. Benhajali, H. Jorjani and V. Ducrocq ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">VIT || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top"> ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">General Discussion ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; "> ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected"> ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected"> || |
||<style="text-align:center;vertical-align:top" |13>'''Sunday, August 27th''' ||<#ffc0cb style="text-align:center" |4>'''Impact of genomic pre-selection on N-GES and I-GES (MACE) + Model choice & validation of GES in the genomic era (4) <<BR>> <<BR>>''' '''Chair:''' ''TBA'' ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">I. J. P. Vermeer ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">Bias in proofs of non-random used sire ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">J.J. Vosman, G. de Jong ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">the Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">CRV || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">08:45 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">M. Koivula ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Validation of genomic and genetic evaluations in 305d production traits of nordic Holstein cattle ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">I. Strandén, G. P. Aamand, Esa A. Mäntysaari ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Finland ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">LUKE || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Z. Liu ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">Approximating genomic reliabilities for national genomic evaluation ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">P. M. !VanRaden, M. Lidauer, M. P. Calus, H. Benhajali, H. Jorjani and V. Ducrocq ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Germany ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">VIT || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">09:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top"> ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">General Discussion ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; "> ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected"> ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected"> || |
Line 63: | Line 65: |
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top;text-align:center" |6>'''Intergration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genetic evaluations (5) <<BR>> <<BR>>''' '''Chair:''' ''TBA'' ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">10:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">I. Rukin ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Development of milk data control system for reducing the bias of genomic evaluation for the Russian Holstein breed ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Pantiukh K., Rysina M., Knyazeva T., Grouzdev D. ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Russian Federation ||<#ffc0cb>Moscow State University, I Gene LLC, All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Breeding || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">10:45 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">K. Stachowicz ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Genetic parameters of cow functional survival and conformation traits with recommendations for genetic evaluation ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">C. Quinton, S. Meyer, P. Amer, C. Phyn ||<#ffc0cb>New Zealand ||<#ffc0cb>!AbacusBio || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">11:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">A.M. Tyrisevä ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Evaluation of conception rate in nordic dairy cattle ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Muuttoranta, K., Pösö, J., Nielsen, U. S., Eriksson, J.-Å., Aamand, G.P., Mäntysaari, E. A., and M.H. Lidauer ||<#ffc0cb>Finland ||<#ffc0cb>LUKE || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">11:15 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">M. van Pelt ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Improving the genetic evaluation for longevity in the Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">G. de Jong, R. Veerkamp ||<#ffc0cb>the Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb>CRV || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">11:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">B. Fuerst-Waltl ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Phenotypic and genetic relationships between subclinical ketosis, body condition score, fat-protein ratio and other diseases in Austrian Fleckvieh cows ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">A. Köck, F. Steininger, C. Fuerst, C. Egger-Danner ||<#ffc0cb>Austria ||<#ffc0cb>University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences || |
||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top;text-align:center" |6>'''Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genetic evaluations (5) <<BR>> <<BR>>''' '''Chair:''' ''TBA'' ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="vertical-align:top">10:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">I. Rukin ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Development of milk data control system for reducing the bias of genomic evaluation for the Russian Holstein breed ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Pantiukh K., Rysina M., Knyazeva T., Grouzdev D. ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Russian Federation ||<#ffc0cb>Moscow State University, I Gene LLC, All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Breeding || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">10:45 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">K. Stachowicz ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Genetic parameters of cow functional survival and conformation traits with recommendations for genetic evaluation ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">C. Quinton, S. Meyer, P. Amer, C. Phyn ||<#ffc0cb>New Zealand ||<#ffc0cb>!AbacusBio || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">11:00 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">A.M. Tyrisevä ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Evaluation of conception rate in nordic dairy cattle ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Muuttoranta, K., Pösö, J., Nielsen, U. S., Eriksson, J.-Å., Aamand, G.P., Mäntysaari, E. A., and M.H. Lidauer ||<#ffc0cb>Finland ||<#ffc0cb>LUKE || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">11:15 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">M. van Pelt ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Improving the genetic evaluation for longevity in the Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">G. de Jong, R. Veerkamp ||<#ffc0cb>the Netherlands ||<#ffc0cb>CRV || ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected" style="text-align:left; ">11:30 ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">B. Fuerst-Waltl ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">Phenotypic and genetic relationships between subclinical ketosis, body condition score, fat-protein ratio and other diseases in Austrian Fleckvieh cows ||<#ffc0cb class="mceSelected">A. Köck, F. Steininger, C. Fuerst, C. Egger-Danner ||<#ffc0cb>Austria ||<#ffc0cb>University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences || |
Line 69: | Line 71: |
|| ||<class="mceSelected"> ||<class="mceSelected">12:00 - 12:30 ||<class="mceSelected">Lunch || || ||<class="mceSelected"> ||<class="mceSelected">13:00 - 15:00 ||<class="mceSelected">Interbull Business Meeting 2 || |
||<class="mceSelected"> ||<class="mceSelected">12:00 - 12:30 ||<class="mceSelected">Lunch || ||<class="mceSelected"> ||<class="mceSelected">13:00 - 15:00 ||<class="mceSelected">Interbull Business Meeting 2 || ||<#99ccff class="mceSelected">Monday, August 28th ||<#99ccff class="mceSelected"> ||<#99ccff class="mceSelected"> ||<#99ccff> || || || || || |
|
|
2017 Interbull Meeting
August 25 - 28, 2017 Tallinn, Estonia
General Program - Interbull Activities
Day |
Time |
|
Location |
|
|
Interbull Annual Meeting |
|
Friday 25 August |
08:00 to 12:30 |
Interbull Technical Committee (+ SAC) Meeting 1 |
|
|
13:00 to 19:00 |
Interbull Steering Committee (+ SAC) Meeting 1 |
|
Saturday, 26 August |
08:30 to 12:30 |
Interbull Open Meetings (1+2) |
|
|
13:30 to 15:30 |
Interbull Business Meeting 1 |
|
|
16:00 to 18:00 |
Interbull Open Meetings (3) |
|
|
19:00 to 22:00 |
Interbull Dinner |
|
Sunday, 27 August |
08:30 to 12:00 |
Interbull Open Meetings (4+5) |
|
|
13:00 to 15:00 |
Interbull Business Meeting 2 |
|
|
15:15 to 17:00 |
Interbull Technical Committee (+ SAC) Meeting 2 |
|
|
17:00 to 19:00 |
Interbull Steering Committee Meeting 2 |
|
Monday, 28 August |
08:30 to 12:30 |
Joint Interbull – EAAP Session. Session 1: Managing genetic diversity in cattle in the era of genomic selection (with Interbull) |
EAAP |
||<#e099ae class="mceSelected"> ||<#e099ae class="mceSelected">14:00 to 18:00 ||<#e099ae class="mceSelected">Joint Interbull – EAAP Session. Session 7: Genetic defects in cattle – identification, finding the mutation and managing it in breeding plans (with Interbull) ||<#e099ae class="mceSelected">EAAP ||
Technical and Steering Committee Meetings are administrative meetings restricted to the respective members, and include joint sessions with Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) where indicated; Business Meetings are public and are dedicated to discuss operational and political decisions of the Steering Committee with participating organizations; Open Meetings are dedicated to scientific reports.
Scientific Program - Interbull Open Session
Download the scientific progarm as pdf
|
Session |
Time |
Author |
Scientific report title |
Other authors |
Country |
Organization |
Saturday, August 26th |
Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genomic evaluations (1) |
08:30 |
N. Friggens |
Genomic management tools to optimize resilience and efficiency |
C. Kaya, A.W.M. Roozen |
France |
INRA |
08:45 |
E. Groeneveld |
Large scale SNP data management and integration in breeding programs |
|
Germany |
FLI |
||
09:00 |
W.M. Stoop |
Genomics in small populations: the MRY breed |
G. Veninga, G. de Jong, F. Reinhardt |
the Netherlands |
CRV BV |
||
09:15 |
H. Alkhoder |
The impact of adding cows to the EuroGenomics bull reference population on genomic prediction |
Z. Liu, F. Reinhardt |
Germany |
VIT |
||
09:30 |
H. Jorjani |
InterGenomics for Holstein populations |
H. Jorjani, V. Palucci, J. Sendecka |
Sweden |
Interbull Centre |
||
09:45 |
General Discussion |
||||||
|
10:00 |
Coffee Break |
|||||
Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genomic evaluations (2) |
10:30 |
A. Kudinov |
Upgrading dairy cattle evaluation sustem in Russian Federation |
J. Juga, P. Uimari, E.A. Mäntysaari, I. Strandén, K.V. Plemyashov, E.I. Saksa, M.G. Smaragdov |
Finland, Russian Federation |
University of Helsinki, Russian Reserch Institute of Farm Animals Genetic and Breeding |
|
10:45 |
R. Bonifazi |
Preliminary study of VCE for Limousine and Charolais breeds through Mix99 software |
E. Hjerpe, T. Pabiou, H. Benhajali, H. Jorjani |
Sweden |
Interbull Centre |
||
11:00 |
A. Govignon-Gion |
Genetic evaluation of calving ease for French beef cattle breeds with dairy maternal support |
Bouleisteix P., Brunet J.L., Delpeuch A., Miller S., Venot E., Mattalia S. |
France |
Institut de l'Elevage |
||
11:15 |
H. Täubert |
A new model for the genetic evaluation for longevity in Germany |
J. Heise, F. Reinhardt, R. Reents |
Germany |
VIT |
||
11:30 |
P. Amer |
Options for incorporating feed intake data into national selection indexes |
S. Meier |
New Zealand |
AbacusBio |
||
11:45 |
L. Chavinskaia |
International order of cattle breeding. Interbull as a space of commensuration |
|
France |
INRA |
||
12:00 |
Z. Liu (presented by H. Jorjani) |
SNP-MACE |
H. Jorjani |
Germany |
VIT |
||
12:15 |
General Discussion |
||||||
|
12:30 -13:30 |
Lunch |
|||||
|
13:30 - 15:30 |
Interbull Business meeting 1 |
|||||
|
15:30 - 16:00 |
Coffee Break |
|||||
Model choice & Validation of GES in the genomic era (3) |
16:00 |
I. Misztal |
Studies on inflation of GEBV in single-step GBLUP for type |
S. Tsuruta, Y. Masuda, D. Lourenco, T. J. Lawlor |
USA |
University of Georgia |
|
16:30 |
B. Harris |
Experiencing solving large scale single step marker best linear unbiased models |
|
New Zealand |
LIC |
||
16:45 |
C. Edel |
Do biased gene-content estimates inflate genomic predictions with single-step GBLUP? |
Pimentel, E.C.G.; Emmerling, R. and Götz, K.-U. |
Germany |
Bavarian State Research Center For Agriculture, Institute of Animal Breeding |
||
17:00 |
S. Rensing |
Cow reference population - benefit for genomic evaluation system and farmers |
H. Alkhoder, C. Kubitz, S. Schierenbeck and D. Segelke |
Germany |
VIT |
||
17:15 |
R. Bonifazi |
Comparison of genomic reliability in national genomic evaluation of dairy cattle populations |
V. Palucci, E. Hjerpe, F. M. Sarti, E. Lasagna, H. Jorjani, H. Benhajali |
Sweden |
Interbull Centre |
||
17:30 |
R. Bonifazi (presented by H. Jorjani) |
Speed up rG estimation |
H. Benhajali, T. Pabiou, E. Hjerpe, M. Lidauer, H. Jorjani |
Sweden |
Interbull Centre |
||
17:45 |
General Discussion |
||||||
|
19:00 - 22:00 |
Interbull Dinner |
|||||
Sunday, August 27th |
Impact of genomic pre-selection on N-GES and I-GES (MACE) + Model choice & validation of GES in the genomic era (4) |
08:30 |
I. J. P. Vermeer |
Bias in proofs of non-random used sire |
J.J. Vosman, G. de Jong |
the Netherlands |
CRV |
08:45 |
M. Koivula |
Validation of genomic and genetic evaluations in 305d production traits of nordic Holstein cattle |
I. Strandén, G. P. Aamand, Esa A. Mäntysaari |
Finland |
LUKE |
||
09:00 |
Z. Liu |
Approximating genomic reliabilities for national genomic evaluation |
P. M. VanRaden, M. Lidauer, M. P. Calus, H. Benhajali, H. Jorjani and V. Ducrocq |
Germany |
VIT |
||
09:30 |
|
General Discussion |
|
|
|
||
|
10:00 - 10:30 |
Coffee Breack |
|||||
Integration of new phenotypes/initiatives into (inter)national genetic evaluations (5) |
10:30 |
I. Rukin |
Development of milk data control system for reducing the bias of genomic evaluation for the Russian Holstein breed |
Pantiukh K., Rysina M., Knyazeva T., Grouzdev D. |
Russian Federation |
Moscow State University, I Gene LLC, All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Breeding |
|
10:45 |
K. Stachowicz |
Genetic parameters of cow functional survival and conformation traits with recommendations for genetic evaluation |
C. Quinton, S. Meyer, P. Amer, C. Phyn |
New Zealand |
AbacusBio |
||
11:00 |
A.M. Tyrisevä |
Evaluation of conception rate in nordic dairy cattle |
Muuttoranta, K., Pösö, J., Nielsen, U. S., Eriksson, J.-Å., Aamand, G.P., Mäntysaari, E. A., and M.H. Lidauer |
Finland |
LUKE |
||
11:15 |
M. van Pelt |
Improving the genetic evaluation for longevity in the Netherlands |
G. de Jong, R. Veerkamp |
the Netherlands |
CRV |
||
11:30 |
B. Fuerst-Waltl |
Phenotypic and genetic relationships between subclinical ketosis, body condition score, fat-protein ratio and other diseases in Austrian Fleckvieh cows |
A. Köck, F. Steininger, C. Fuerst, C. Egger-Danner |
Austria |
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences |
||
11:45 |
J. Cole |
Development of genomic evaluations for direct measures of health in U.S. Holsteins and their correlations with fitness traits |
K.L. Parker Gaddis, M.E. Tooker, J.R. Wright, J.H. Megonigal, Jr., J.S. Clay, and P.M. VanRaden |
USA |
Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, ARS, USDA |
||
|
12:00 - 12:30 |
Lunch |
|||||
|
13:00 - 15:00 |
Interbull Business Meeting 2 |
|||||
Monday, August 28th |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|