Differences between revisions 20 and 83 (spanning 63 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 20 as of 2015-09-02 15:31:27 →
Size: 5640
Editor: Valentina
Comment:
← Revision 83 as of 2025-01-28 16:06:43 → ⇥
Size: 6276
Editor: KatarineHaugaard
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
= Official Results from the GEBV test (April 2014): =
== Official GEBV test rules: ==
 * GEBV validation should be performed the first time a country joins Interbull genomic evaluations (or simply validations) and every two years afterwards. Then validation is needed whenever there is a major change either in the genomic evaluation or in the conventional evaluation. Additionally, if there is a major change in the reference population a new validation should be required.
 * The expected regression coefficient for the validation model 1 should be within the confidence interval of plus minus two times the standard error (t test). For very large reference populations, however, the SE becomes too small and makes the above criteria too restrictive. Therefore, it is proposed a “biological confidence interval” of ±0.1.
 * Following decision by the ICAR board, all countries that want to validate national GEBVs need to participate in the GEBV validation test starting on April 12, 2012, for all production traits (milk, fat and protein yields).
 * Validation should only be noted as failed if regression coefficients are significantly lower than the expected value (=over evaluation of young bulls).		 = Official Results from the GEBV-test: =
== Official GEBV-test rules: ==
 * Then GEBV-test is needed whenever there is a major change either in the genomic evaluation or in the conventional evaluation. Additionally, if there is a major change in the reference population a new GEBV-test should be required.GEBV-test is valid for only two years.
 * Following decision by the ICAR board, all countries that want to validate national GEBVs need to participate in the GEBV-test starting on April 12, 2012, for all production traits (milk, fat and protein yields).
 * The expected regression coefficient for the GEBV-test model 1 should be within the confidence interval of plus minus two times the standard error (t test).
 * For very large reference populations, however, the SE becomes too small and makes the above criteria too restrictive. Therefore, it is proposed a “biological confidence interval” of ±0.1.
 * The R-square of model 1 should be higher than the R-Square of model 2.
 * GEBV-test should only be noted as failed if regression coefficients are significantly lower than the expected value (=over evaluation of young bulls), or higher than 1.20.
Line 8: Line 10:
The following populations have succeeded to provide the information requested and passed the GEBV test (rows underlined indicate that the last test is older than 2 years).
||<tablestyle="text-align:center;"rowstyle="text-align:center;"width="74px" height="19px" style="text-align:center; ">'''Population''' ||<width="42px" style="text-align:center; ">'''Breed''' ||<width="152px" style="text-align:center; ">'''Date of latest validation''' ||<width="35px" style="text-align:center; ">'''mil''' ||<width="35px" style="text-align:center; ">'''fat''' ||<width="35px" style="text-align:center; ">'''pro''' ||<width="590px" style="text-align:center; ">'''Organization providing data''' ||
||AUS ||HOL ||201402 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Australian Dairy Herd Improvement Scheme (ADHIS) ||		 The following populations have succeeded to provide the information requested and passed the GEBV-test ('''Please note that some GEBV-test results are older than 2 years''').
||<tablestyle="text-align:center;"rowstyle="text-align:center;"width="74px" height="19px" style="text-align:center;                                                                 ">'''Population''' ||<width="42px" style="text-align:center;                                                                 ">'''Breed''' ||<width="152px" style="text-align:center;                                                                 ">'''Date of latest validation''' ||<width="35px" style="text-align:center;                                                                 ">'''mil''' ||<width="35px" style="text-align:center;                                                                 ">'''fat''' ||<width="35px" style="text-align:center;                                                                 ">'''pro''' ||<width="590px" style="text-align:center;                                                                 ">'''Organization providing data''' ||
||AUS ||HOL ||202501 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Solutions for Herd Development (DataGene) ||
Line 12: Line 14:
||<height="19px">BEL ||HOL ||201409 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Faculté Universitaire des Sciences Agronomiques - Groupe de Génétique et Amélioration Animales || ||<height="19px">BEL ||HOL ||202103 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Faculté Universitaire des Sciences Agronomiques - Groupe de Génétique et Amélioration Animales ||
Line 17: Line 19:
||<height="19px">CHE ||BSW ||201207 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Qualitas AG || ||<height="19px">CHE ||BSW ||202501 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Qualitas AG ||
Line 19: Line 21:
||<height="19px">CHE ||HOL ||201302 ||Y || || ||Qualitas AG || ||<height="19px">CHE ||HOL ||201608 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Qualitas AG ||
Line 21: Line 23:
||<height="19px">DEA ||BSW ||201401 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture (LfL) ||
||<height="19px">DEA ||BSWi ||201307 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Intergenomics ||
||<height="19px">DEU'''''__ __''''' ||HOL ||201411'''''__ __''''' ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Vereinigte Informationssysteme Tierhaltung w.V (vit) ||
||<height="19px">DEA ||SIM ||201401 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture (LfL) ||
||<height="19px">DFS ||HOL ||201409 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Nordic Genetic evaluation (NAV) ||
||<height="19px">DFS ||JER ||201205 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Nordic Genetic evaluation (NAV) ||
||<height="19px">DFS ||RDC ||201205 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Nordic Genetic evaluation (NAV) ||
||<height="19px">ESP ||HOL ||201501 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Confederation of Spanish Holstein Associations (CONAFE) ||		 ||<height="19px">CZE ||HOL ||201909 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Czech Moravian Breeders' Corporation (PLEMDAT) ||
||<height="19px">DEA ||BSW ||202301 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture (LfL) ||
||<height="19px">DEA ||BSWi ||202301 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Intergenomics ||
||<height="19px">DEU'''''__ __''''' ||HOL ||202501 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Vereinigte Informationssysteme Tierhaltung w.V (vit) ||
||<height="19px">DEA ||SIM ||202301 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture (LfL) ||
||<height="19px">DFS ||HOL ||202501 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Nordic Genetic evaluation (NAV) ||
||<height="19px">DFS ||JER ||201612 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Nordic Genetic evaluation (NAV) ||
||<height="19px">DFS ||RDC ||201612 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Nordic Genetic evaluation (NAV) ||
||<height="19px">ESP ||HOL ||202307 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Confederation of Spanish Holstein Associations (CONAFE) ||
Line 30: Line 33:
||<height="19px">FRA ||HOL ||201504 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||France Génétique Elevage ||
||<height="19px">FRA ||MON ||201501 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||France Génétique Elevage ||
||<height="19px">FRA ||SIM ||201403 || || ||Y ||France Génétique Elevage ||
||<height="19px">__'''''GBR '''''__ ||__'''''HOL '''''__ ||__'''''201111 '''''__ ||__'''''Y '''''__ ||__'''''Y '''''__ ||__'''''Y '''''__ ||__''''' Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC) '''''__ ||
||<height="19px">__'''''IRL '''''__ ||__'''''HOL '''''__ ||__'''''201108 '''''__ ||__'''''Y '''''__ ||__'''''Y '''''__ ||__'''''Y '''''__ ||__'''''Irish Cattle Breeding Federation '''''__ ||
||<height="19px">ITA ||BSWi ||201307 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Intergenomics ||		 ||<height="19px">FRA ||HOL ||202209 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||French Genetic Evaluation Centre (GENEVAL) ||
||<height="19px">FRA ||MON ||201501 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||French Genetic Evaluation Centre (GENEVAL) ||
||<height="19px">FRA ||NMD ||201501 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||French Genetic Evaluation Centre (GENEVAL) ||
||<height="19px">GBR__''''' '''''__ ||HOL__''''' '''''__ ||202303 ||''Y '' ||''Y '' ||''Y '' ||'' Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC) '' ||
||<height="19px">HUN ||HOL ||202309 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Central Agricultural Office (MgSzH) ||
||<height="19px">IRL ||HOL ||201108 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Irish Cattle Breeding Federation ||
||<height="19px">ITA ||BSW ||201910 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Associazione Nazionale Allevatori Razza Bruna (ANARB) ||
Line 37: Line 41:
||<height="19px">ITA ||SIM ||201205 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Associazione Nazionale Allevatori Pezzata Rossa Italiana (ANAPRI) ||
||<height="19px">JPN ||HOL ||201205 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||National Livestock Breeding Centre ||
||<height="19px">NLD ||HOL ||201407 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Genetic Evaluation Sires (GES) ||		 ||<height="19px">ITA ||SIM ||202101 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Associazione Nazionale Allevatori Pezzata Rossa Italiana (ANAPRI) ||
||<height="19px">JPN ||HOL ||201509 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||National Livestock Breeding Centre ||
||<height="19px">NLD ||HOL ||202309 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Genetic Evaluation Sires (GES) ||
Line 42: Line 46:
||<height="19px">POL ||HOL ||201307 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Polish Federation of   Cattle Breeders and Dairy Farmers ||
||<height="19px">SVN ||BSWi ||201307 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Intergenomics ||
||<height="19px">USA ||BSW ||201409 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory (AIPL-USDA) ||		 ||<height="19px">POL ||HOL ||202501 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Polish Federation of Cattle Breeders and Dairy Farmers ||
||<height="19px">SVN ||BSW ||202303 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||University of Ljubljana, Zootechnical department (BFRO) ||
||<height="19px">USA ||BSW ||201612 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory (AIPL-USDA) ||
Line 48: Line 52:
||<height="19px">NOR ||RDC ||202106 ||Y ||Y ||Y ||GENO Breeding and A.I. Association ||

Official Results from the GEBV-test:

Official GEBV-test rules:

  • Then GEBV-test is needed whenever there is a major change either in the genomic evaluation or in the conventional evaluation. Additionally, if there is a major change in the reference population a new GEBV-test should be required.GEBV-test is valid for only two years.
  • Following decision by the ICAR board, all countries that want to validate national GEBVs need to participate in the GEBV-test starting on April 12, 2012, for all production traits (milk, fat and protein yields).
  • The expected regression coefficient for the GEBV-test model 1 should be within the confidence interval of plus minus two times the standard error (t test).
  • For very large reference populations, however, the SE becomes too small and makes the above criteria too restrictive. Therefore, it is proposed a “biological confidence interval” of ±0.1.
  • The R-square of model 1 should be higher than the R-Square of model 2.
  • GEBV-test should only be noted as failed if regression coefficients are significantly lower than the expected value (=over evaluation of young bulls), or higher than 1.20.

The following populations have succeeded to provide the information requested and passed the GEBV-test (Please note that some GEBV-test results are older than 2 years).

Population

Breed

Date of latest validation

mil

fat

pro

Organization providing data

AUS

HOL

202501

Y

Y

Y

Solutions for Herd Development (DataGene)

AUS

JER

201302

Y

Y

Australian Dairy Herd Improvement Scheme (ADHIS)

BEL

HOL

202103

Y

Y

Y

Faculté Universitaire des Sciences Agronomiques - Groupe de Génétique et Amélioration Animales

CAN

BSW

201302

Y

Y

Y

Canadian Dairy Network (CDN)

CAN

HOL

201501

Y

Y

Y

Canadian Dairy Network (CDN)

CAN

JER

201302

Y

Y

Y

Canadian Dairy Network (CDN)

CAN

RDC

201302

Y

Y

Y

Canadian Dairy Network (CDN)

CHE

BSW

202501

Y

Y

Y

Qualitas AG

CHE

BSWi

201307

Y

Y

Y

Intergenomics

CHE

HOL

201608

Y

Y

Y

Qualitas AG

CHE

RHO

201302

Y

Y

Y

Qualitas AG

CZE

HOL

201909

Y

Y

Y

Czech Moravian Breeders' Corporation (PLEMDAT)

DEA

BSW

202301

Y

Y

Y

Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture (LfL)

DEA

BSWi

202301

Y

Y

Y

Intergenomics

DEU

HOL

202501

Y

Y

Y

Vereinigte Informationssysteme Tierhaltung w.V (vit)

DEA

SIM

202301

Y

Y

Y

Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture (LfL)

DFS

HOL

202501

Y

Y

Y

Nordic Genetic evaluation (NAV)

DFS

JER

201612

Y

Y

Y

Nordic Genetic evaluation (NAV)

DFS

RDC

201612

Y

Y

Y

Nordic Genetic evaluation (NAV)

ESP

HOL

202307

Y

Y

Y

Confederation of Spanish Holstein Associations (CONAFE)

FRA

BSWi

201307

Y

Y

Y

Intergenomics

FRA

HOL

202209

Y

Y

Y

French Genetic Evaluation Centre (GENEVAL)

FRA

MON

201501

Y

Y

Y

French Genetic Evaluation Centre (GENEVAL)

FRA

NMD

201501

Y

Y

Y

French Genetic Evaluation Centre (GENEVAL)

GBR

HOL

202303

Y

Y

Y

Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC)

HUN

HOL

202309

Y

Y

Y

Central Agricultural Office (MgSzH)

IRL

HOL

201108

Y

Y

Y

Irish Cattle Breeding Federation

ITA

BSW

201910

Y

Y

Y

Associazione Nazionale Allevatori Razza Bruna (ANARB)

ITA

HOL

201406

Y

Y

Y

Associazione Nazionale Allevatori Frisona Italiana (ANAFI)

ITA

SIM

202101

Y

Y

Y

Associazione Nazionale Allevatori Pezzata Rossa Italiana (ANAPRI)

JPN

HOL

201509

Y

Y

Y

National Livestock Breeding Centre

NLD

HOL

202309

Y

Y

Y

Genetic Evaluation Sires (GES)

NZL

HOL

201007

Y

Livestock Improvement Corporation

NZL

JER

201007

Y

Livestock Improvement Corporation

POL

HOL

202501

Y

Y

Y

Polish Federation of Cattle Breeders and Dairy Farmers

SVN

BSW

202303

Y

Y

Y

University of Ljubljana, Zootechnical department (BFRO)

USA

BSW

201612

Y

Y

Y

Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory (AIPL-USDA)

USA

BSWi

201307

Y

Y

Y

Intergenomics

USA

HOL

201409

Y

Y

Y

Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory (AIPL-USDA)

USA

JER

201409

Y

Y

Y

Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory (AIPL-USDA)

NOR

RDC

202106

Y

Y

Y

GENO Breeding and A.I. Association

public/official_GEBVtest (last edited 2025-02-26 13:12:49 by KatarineHaugaard)